Author Topic: Bynum>JO.  (Read 794 times)

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #30 on: January 08, 2008, 11:53:49 AM »
Anyone notice how it's a lose-lose situation with Laker haters? When Kobe is collecting massive stats never before seen in this leage, he's "not getting the other players involved". When he's getting everyone involved and improving his teammates, the bench is "outshining him"...get the fuck out of here with that shit.
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #31 on: January 08, 2008, 11:55:31 AM »
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.

Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.


We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. :D

Yeah, probably, as when the Lakers sucked dicked he missed the playoffs averaging 27 points a game on .433 shooting along with 6 rebounds and 4 turnovers.

Yeah that goes to show the Western Conference is a muthafucka. Then again, Lebron managed to miss the playoffs 2 straight years while playing in the East  :-X
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #32 on: January 08, 2008, 12:02:17 PM »
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe

it's damn close.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 10, 2001, 04:19:36 PM
This guy aint no crip, and I'm 100% sure on that because he doesn't type like a crip, I know crips, and that fool is not a crip.


"I went from being homeless strung out on Dust to an 8 bedroom estate signed 2 1 of my fav rappers... Pump it up jokes can't hurt me."-- Mr. Joey Buddens
 

SGV

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #33 on: January 08, 2008, 12:05:45 PM »
Yeah sure, bringing Shaq to L.A. was a good look. But it didn't do shit for them until the 2000's. How can you down the Suns for being a good Regular season team but a poor Playoff team, yet sit here and big up the 90s Lakers? LOL. Horrible.

When the Cavs played the Lakers back in December, Lebron owned Kobe.

STARTERS         MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS  
Kobe Bryant       40 8-22    0-3      5-8      1       4      5     5     1    0    2   2   21
LeBron James     38 12-29   0-3     9-11     4       6     10    5     1    1    3   3   33


And quite frankly, he's owning Kobe this season too.

Kobe
           G GS  MIN   FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A   FT% OF DF TOT STL BLK TO    PF  AST PTS
Season 32 32 36.5 286-647 .442 55-162 .340 228-265 .860 1.0 5.1 6.1 1.97 .53 3.31 2.44 4.9 26.7

Lebron
           G  GS MIN  FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A  3P% FTM-A   FT% OF  DF TOT STL BLK TO     PF  AST PTS
Season 29 28 39.9 300-629 .477 38-128 .297 210-296 .709 1.5 5.8 7.2 1.90 1.07 3.14 2.10 7.7 29.2
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #34 on: January 08, 2008, 12:34:16 PM »
Yeah sure, bringing Shaq to L.A. was a good look. But it didn't do shit for them until the 2000's. How can you down the Suns for being a good Regular season team but a poor Playoff team, yet sit here and big up the 90s Lakers? LOL. Horrible.

When the Cavs played the Lakers back in December, Lebron owned Kobe.

STARTERS         MIN FGM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OREB DREB REB AST STL BLK TO PF PTS 
Kobe Bryant       40 8-22    0-3      5-8      1       4      5     5     1    0    2   2   21
LeBron James     38 12-29   0-3     9-11     4       6     10    5     1    1    3   3   33


And quite frankly, he's owning Kobe this season too.

Kobe
           G GS  MIN   FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A   FT% OF DF TOT STL BLK TO    PF  AST PTS
Season 32 32 36.5 286-647 .442 55-162 .340 228-265 .860 1.0 5.1 6.1 1.97 .53 3.31 2.44 4.9 26.7

Lebron
           G  GS MIN  FGM-A    FG% 3PM-A  3P% FTM-A   FT% OF  DF TOT STL BLK TO     PF  AST PTS
Season 29 28 39.9 300-629 .477 38-128 .297 210-296 .709 1.5 5.8 7.2 1.90 1.07 3.14 2.10 7.7 29.2



Lakers were very storied in the 90s...that's all I'm saying. you're tryna act as if they were in the same league as the Celtics, which is pathetic. LOL.


Stat-wise, LeBron is up there...but anyone with half a brain will tell you he's not anywhere near the likes of Jordan, Magic, Kobe, Bird, etc...Maybe one day, though.
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #35 on: January 08, 2008, 12:34:48 PM »
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.



An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.

LeBron > Kobe

it's damn close.



7even doesn't really believe that, and neither do you.
 

Fuck Your Existence

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3490
  • Karma: 109
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #36 on: January 08, 2008, 01:05:14 PM »
Anyone notice how it's a lose-lose situation with Laker haters? When Kobe is collecting massive stats never before seen in this leage, he's "not getting the other players involved". When he's getting everyone involved and improving his teammates, the bench is "outshining him"...get the fuck out of here with that shit.
i was just gonna post that, before he was a ballhog and now that he's a "team player" he cant score all of a sudden. He could take over a game and shoot the lights out if he wanted but thats not how this current team is structured. Kobe has to get his team mates involved and involved early for his team to win.
 

SGV

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #37 on: January 08, 2008, 01:16:17 PM »
And you realize that it's lose-lose with Laker Dickriders. A team finishes with a better record in the regular season, they're not as good as the Lakers because of some reason. They beat the Lakers and what's said? The Lakers had that, they let the game go. They were 1 rebound away. The refs were against us.

It's rare to see a Laker Dickrider actually admit that the Lakers ever lost because they were inferior.
 

Teddy Roosevelt

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7538
  • Karma: 179
  • The Trust-Buster
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #38 on: January 08, 2008, 01:17:55 PM »
^^That's why they're called dickriders. ::)
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #39 on: January 08, 2008, 01:19:51 PM »
And you realize that it's lose-lose with Laker Dickriders. A team finishes with a better record in the regular season, they're not as good as the Lakers because of some reason. They beat the Lakers and what's said? The Lakers had that, they let the game go. They were 1 rebound away. The refs were against us.

It's rare to see a Laker Dickrider actually admit that the Lakers ever lost because they were inferior.


Laker dickriders suck...not as much as Laker haters, though. :-*
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #40 on: January 08, 2008, 02:13:38 PM »
Alright lets get back on topic cuz we have like 4 different debates going on right now.

Let's sum it up...

Kobe > Lebron

Lakers franchise > Celtics franchise

How about that Andrew Bynum?
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

SGV

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #41 on: January 08, 2008, 02:15:07 PM »
Alright lets get back on topic cuz we have like 4 different debates going on right now.

Let's sum it up...

Kobe < Lebron

Lakers franchise < Celtics franchise

How about that Andrew Bynum?

Stat-wise, Bynum is up there...but anyone with half a brain will tell you he's not anywhere near the likes of Amare, JO, Howard etc...Maybe one day, though.
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #42 on: January 08, 2008, 02:17:46 PM »
Alright lets get back on topic cuz we have like 4 different debates going on right now.

Let's sum it up...

Kobe < Lebron

Lakers franchise < Celtics franchise

How about that Andrew Bynum?

Stat-wise, Bynum is up there...but anyone with half a brain will tell you he's not anywhere near the likes of Amare, JO, Howard etc...Maybe one day, though.


Then why can't any of them hold Bynum? Bynum has nothing to do with stats. He takes 8 shots a game. Come up with some real arguments, basketball head.
 

Hatesrats™

  • Tha Drunk Gem-in-I
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5607
  • Karma: 215
  • "Gz Up, Hoes Down"
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #43 on: January 08, 2008, 02:34:00 PM »
As per the Lakers lineup we have right now I'd say
Bynum >>> J.O. like a Muthfucka, Imagine J.O. on this team  :P
I was always oppossed to a trade for J.O., IMO it was either KG or Bust.

I'm 100% glad the Lakers decided to ride with Bynum.
The Kid is doing his thing right now, By next season we shall see further.
I know/belive he can continue, Once Bynum makes this Double Double thing his everyday game (like he has Sofar this year)
Dude reminds me of a Young Duncan, minus the jump shot but he's defo got a stroke check his free throw's.
Once he adds a Jumper or a least a short range hook on a consitant bassis, GAME OVER.

He's a beast, with Monster in the making.
IMO, he should be considered for All-Star status this year
 

SGV

  • Guest
Re: Bynum>JO.
« Reply #44 on: January 08, 2008, 02:49:09 PM »


Then why can't any of them hold Bynum? Bynum has nothing to do with stats. He takes 8 shots a game. Come up with some real arguments, basketball head.

If I was NIK, how would I respond "Amare played less minutes." "Bynum went to the line more times than JO and he played more minutes."

LOL. End of the day, Bynum may have had a good game against these dudes, but he still hasn't proven he's better. This is his first season where he's actually doing good. Let's see if he can keep up this pace before you start talking about who he's better than. Last season you spoke nothing but bad about him. But now that he's doing good, you're all over his sack.