It's June 01, 2024, 12:55:10 AM
Quote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:00:25 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 02:58:59 PMThis is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.
Quote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 02:58:59 PMThis is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?
Quote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 06:11:47 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:00:25 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 02:58:59 PMThis is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.
Quote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:37:48 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 06:11:47 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:00:25 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 02:58:59 PMThis is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.My point exactly. Turf Hitta is proving my point in this thread while trying to shit on my other point in the Laker thread, lol
And I bet Denzel Washington's family were slaves to George Washington's family too, huh? Same with Andrew Jackson and Michael Jackson. Your idle speculation is all starting to make sense.
Quote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:37:48 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 06:11:47 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:00:25 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 02:58:59 PMThis is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.I never said it was unreasonable. I just don't see how its relevant.
Quote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 07:49:04 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:37:48 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 06:11:47 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:00:25 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 02:58:59 PMThis is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.I never said it was unreasonable. I just don't see how its relevant.You don't see how its relevant? Did you read the title of the thread?"Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for..."After reading the title, do you still not see how its relevant to the topic of the thread?
Quote from: Turf Hitta on January 11, 2008, 03:00:01 AMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 07:49:04 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:37:48 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 06:11:47 PMQuote from: Turf Hitta on January 10, 2008, 06:00:25 PMQuote from: I Am The Anton on January 10, 2008, 02:58:59 PMThis is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever. Wait, are you drunk?maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.I never said it was unreasonable. I just don't see how its relevant.You don't see how its relevant? Did you read the title of the thread?"Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for..."After reading the title, do you still not see how its relevant to the topic of the thread?I dont see how this whole topic is relevant to anything this section deals with. Would it make some kind of difference if Reggie's family used to be owned by Bush's family? Would that magically make him stop underperforming on the field?