Author Topic: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...  (Read 431 times)

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2008, 06:37:48 PM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"

Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.

I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2008, 06:41:41 PM by Turf Hitta »
 

Doggystylin

  • Guest
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2008, 06:44:32 PM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"

Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.

I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.

My point exactly. Turf Hitta is proving my point in this thread while trying to shit on my other point in the Laker thread, lol
 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2008, 07:02:44 PM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"

Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.

I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.

My point exactly. Turf Hitta is proving my point in this thread while trying to shit on my other point in the Laker thread, lol

LOL damn. Well, its not like I have some sort of agenda against doggystylin from the sports board on dubcc. Discussion is discussion. I'm not gonna agree with everything everybody says. lol
 

Doggystylin

  • Guest
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2008, 07:05:27 PM »
Of course, I just found it ironic.
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #19 on: January 10, 2008, 07:45:15 PM »
they both spell it "bush"

they must be related

maybe George Bush was REggie's slave
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 10, 2001, 04:19:36 PM
This guy aint no crip, and I'm 100% sure on that because he doesn't type like a crip, I know crips, and that fool is not a crip.


"I went from being homeless strung out on Dust to an 8 bedroom estate signed 2 1 of my fav rappers... Pump it up jokes can't hurt me."-- Mr. Joey Buddens
 

I Am The Anton

  • Muthafuckin' Double OG
  • ****
  • Posts: 734
  • Karma: -26
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #20 on: January 10, 2008, 07:49:04 PM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"

Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.

I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.

I never said it was unreasonable. I just don't see how its relevant.


I need some meaning I can memorize
The kind I have always seems to slip my mind
 

Da818Pn0YgAnGztaA

  • Lil Geezy
  • *
  • Posts: 53
  • Karma: -3
  • Ya d0 noT WaNt iT!!@@!
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #21 on: January 10, 2008, 11:28:34 PM »
And I bet Denzel Washington's family were slaves to George Washington's family too, huh? Same with Andrew Jackson and Michael Jackson. Your idle speculation is all starting to make sense. :laugh:
THE LT PICTURE IN YOUR PICTURES IS BOSS!
 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2008, 03:00:01 AM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"

Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.

I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.

I never said it was unreasonable. I just don't see how its relevant.

You don't see how its relevant? Did you read the title of the thread?

"Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for..."

After reading the title, do you still not see how its relevant to the topic of the thread?
 

I Am The Anton

  • Muthafuckin' Double OG
  • ****
  • Posts: 734
  • Karma: -26
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2008, 11:21:08 AM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"

Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.

I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.

I never said it was unreasonable. I just don't see how its relevant.

You don't see how its relevant? Did you read the title of the thread?

"Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for..."

After reading the title, do you still not see how its relevant to the topic of the thread?

I dont see how this whole topic is relevant to anything this section deals with. Would it make some kind of difference if Reggie's family used to be owned by Bush's family? Would that magically make him stop underperforming on the field?


I need some meaning I can memorize
The kind I have always seems to slip my mind
 

Turf Hitta

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3374
  • Karma: 13
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #24 on: January 11, 2008, 05:10:42 PM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"

Its dumb because it makes no difference. Who cares? Was George Bush's family the only family with the Bush surname? If Reggie Bush's family was owned by GW's, who gives a fuck? I know I don't.

I love how your reply had nothing to do with my post. Its not unreasonable to think that descendants of a black man named Bush could have been slaves of a white family named Bush.

I never said it was unreasonable. I just don't see how its relevant.

You don't see how its relevant? Did you read the title of the thread?

"Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for..."

After reading the title, do you still not see how its relevant to the topic of the thread?

I dont see how this whole topic is relevant to anything this section deals with. Would it make some kind of difference if Reggie's family used to be owned by Bush's family? Would that magically make him stop underperforming on the field?

For God's sake! Does it really need to be spelled out to you? Ok, check game, pimp, this is the sports section. Reggie bush plays sports. the thread has to do with Reggie Bush, a man who plays sports. The title of the thread in the sports section about a man named Reggie Bush, who plays sports, was
"Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for..." Now how was my post irrelevant TO THE TOPIC?

 

Nat Turner-reincarnated

  • Guest
Re: Ya think back in the day Reggie Bush's family were the slaves for...
« Reply #25 on: January 11, 2008, 07:51:42 PM »
This is the dumbest thing i've ever heard you say. Ever.


Wait, are you drunk?

maybe you care to explain where these black people got the surnames of historically prominent WHITE SLAVE-OWNING families? Did they move here from Africa with names like Bush and Washington? Did they get emancipated in the 1800's and say, "Gee, I think I'll name myself AFTER MY FUCKING SLAVE MASTER, THAT WILL SHOW HIM!!"
yeah your right. not let these other people get to you. thats the only logical answer. is it a big deal not really but doesn't hurt to have a quick discussion on it you feel me nigga.