The NBA's Power Rankings

[GangstaBoogy]

 

http://www.nba.com/powerrankings/index.html

[OG Hack Wilson]

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

[Antonio_]

Lakers are for real.

[GangstaBoogy]

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.

[OG Hack Wilson]

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

[GangstaBoogy]

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Not in this case because they're weekly rankings.

Lakers: 4-0
Celtics: 1-2

[Antonio_]

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

 

[OG Hack Wilson]

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking?season=2008&week=11


ESPN > nba.cum

Lol @ ESPN. The Celtics just lost to the Bobcats and the Pistons got blew out by the fuckin Knicks. Meanwhile the Lakers are undefeated in 2008.

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Not in this case because they're weekly rankings.

Lakers: 4-0
Celtics: 1-2

tell that to ESPN.com

[Don Jacob]

i'm content with that. i won't be completely happy til we start winning some playoff games

[Turf Hitta]

http://www.nba.com/powerrankings/index.html

More proof of the NBA's blatant bias against the Lakers.

[R-Tistic]

Fuuuuck.......and this comes out the day we hear Bynum is out for 8 weeks...!!!!!!!!

[OG Hack Wilson]

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.

fair enough but those teams didn't have KG, Ray Allen and Paul Peirce on the same lineup

[blue crew]

yall niccas gettin all geeked up like yall did something big based off ONE week on a website? hahaha...there's more to the nba than one week on a top 10 list. first you niccas talk about hittin your prime in march and april and then yall get excited about being the "best" team one week in january. hahaha. i swear if the lakers win a jump ball u groupies all get hyped like yall actually doin something. good luc without overhyped bynum 

[OG Hack Wilson]

good luc without overhyped bynum 

lol