The NBA's Power Rankings

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

yall niccas gettin all geeked up like yall did something big based off ONE week on a website? hahaha...there's more to the nba than one week on a top 10 list. first you niccas talk about hittin your prime in march and april and then yall get excited about being the "best" team one week in january. hahaha. i swear if the lakers win a jump ball u groupies all get hyped like yall actually doin something. good luc without overhyped bynum 

It's just a thread...calm down, my nicca.

[Antonio_]

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.

fair enough but those teams didn't have KG, Ray Allen and Paul Peirce on the same lineup

LMAO. What about Bryant, Shaq, Malone, Payton AND Phil Jackson?

[OG Hack Wilson]

30-5 > 25-11 nomatter how you twist it

Homie.. let me write you a couple of things once again. First: it says "Weekly Rankings". Our record was been better than yours, in the last week. Second: you are celebrating your before-the-All-Stars-Game-record too much, imho. I mean ok, your team looks solid, and your team will probably end up having a great regular season record. But should i remember you once again how early ended last season for the Mavs? I still remember 7even celebrating their 67-15 record. Ask him how their season ended with him almost crying. Or should i remember you the 64-18 record of the Pistons the year before? They looked unbeatable at one point of the season. They didn't win the damn ring. Let me remind you who had the best record in the 2k's, maybe you'll stop celebrating your. LOL.

2006/07 - Dallas Mavericks 67-15 record, no ring.
2005/06 - Detroit Pistons  64-18 record, no ring.
2004/05 - Phoenix Suns 62-20 record, no ring.
2003/04 - Indiana Pacers 61-21 record, no ring.
2002/03 - Dallas Mavericks 60-22 record, no ring.
2001/02 - Sacramento Kings 61-21 record, no ring.
2000/01 - San Antonio Spurs 58-24 record, no ring.

Homie trust me: i'm more surprised by OUR record than YOUR. That's what the whole board is trying to tell you from a pair of weeks. Your team is SUPPOSED to have a great record. They built a team to win a ring witin 3 years. On the other hand, the Lakers were supposed to struggle to reach the Play Off and to loose Kobe Bryant. Bynum was supposed to be a bum ("Bynum? Fucking ship his ass out!"), and Mitch was supposed to be a moron (while now everybody is on his dick). At the moment the Lakers looks solid and i like our chances in the Play Off. You like yours, ok. But still.

Portland's record > Lakers record > Celtics record.

Fuck the numbers. Your team has to have a winning record in the Play Off, to impress me.

fair enough but those teams didn't have KG, Ray Allen and Paul Peirce on the same lineup

LMAO. What about Bryant, Shaq, Malone, Payton AND Phil Jackson?

malone and payton were at the end of the line

kobe and shaq don't have chemistry

[7even]

Congratulations to #1 in PR and NBA Standings. Enjoy it while it lasts, though. After that Bynum injury and the road games coming in Feburary, the Lakers will never see the #1 spot of their division again.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

kobe and shaq don't have chemistry

LOL!

[OG Hack Wilson]

kobe and shaq don't have chemistry

LOL!

i meant for the year 2004

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

There's no such thing as "chemistry" for Kobe... he does whatever it takes to win.


Shaq and Kobe mighta' had their problems off the court, but on the court, they complimented each other as good as any duo in history.

[OG Hack Wilson]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

[OG Hack Wilson]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami 

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami 

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

[OG Hack Wilson]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami 

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami 

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.

Yea...lets blame Kobe for Shaq's lack of conditioning. LMAO. Anything else you have to add?

[OG Hack Wilson]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami 

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.

Yea...lets blame Kobe for Shaq's lack of conditioning. LMAO. Anything else you have to add?

who did Phil rip in his book again?

[Now_Im_Not_Banned]

but they fell apart at the end and a trade was forced

a team with REAL chemistry came and whooped them like bitches

and the year before that San Antonio blew them out in LA i think in a game 6??

Yes...Cuz Shaq was declining and wasn't motivated to try anymore. Had nothing to do with chemistry.

he was motivated enough to win in Miami 

^^Yea...and that's another reason Laker fans hate him.

blame Kobe for that, not Shaq.

Yea...lets blame Kobe for Shaq's lack of conditioning. LMAO. Anything else you have to add?

who did Phil rip in his book again?

Who is Phil coaching again? Who did Phil diss for not staying in shape and shitting on his team? The knock on Kobe was that he had a big ego, not that he didn't try.