It's May 28, 2024, 08:07:12 AM
that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card
Quote from: Lunatic 63 on June 17, 2008, 02:43:55 PM that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follow
Quote from: JMan on June 17, 2008, 02:54:27 PMQuote from: Lunatic 63 on June 17, 2008, 02:43:55 PM that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follownot necessarily..a red doesn't always follow if a penalty shot is awarded; romania's penalty didnt result in an italian red and nor did portugal's carvalho get a red at the world cup when he fouled henry who was awarded a penalty; carvalho got a yellow and thats what the french player should of got.
Quote from: Lunatic 63 on June 17, 2008, 03:11:35 PMQuote from: JMan on June 17, 2008, 02:54:27 PMQuote from: Lunatic 63 on June 17, 2008, 02:43:55 PM that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follownot necessarily..a red doesn't always follow if a penalty shot is awarded; romania's penalty didnt result in an italian red and nor did portugal's carvalho get a red at the world cup when he fouled henry who was awarded a penalty; carvalho got a yellow and thats what the french player should of got.if the last defender brings down an opposing player in the box then its a straight red card son.. and with the romania / italy game penatly the ref was right not to give panucci a red because he wasnt the last defender.
But the important thing is with France he was the last defender, so it's an automatic red card. The French players didn't complain much, so that tells you everything.
I'm tryna make as many bets with my homies as possible LOL$10.00 each I get Portugal and Spain and they get Italy and Germanyall my friends are Italian and hate Portugal (vice-versa for me ofcourse) they some pussies if they dont take it
Quote from: JMan on June 17, 2008, 03:19:17 PMQuote from: Lunatic 63 on June 17, 2008, 03:11:35 PMQuote from: JMan on June 17, 2008, 02:54:27 PMQuote from: Lunatic 63 on June 17, 2008, 02:43:55 PM that red card was NOT deserving (it definitely was a penalty shot) but that foul didn't warrant a straight red card the red wasnt soo much for the foul, but for denying a goal scoring opportunity.. if the ref gives the penalty then the red card has too follownot necessarily..a red doesn't always follow if a penalty shot is awarded; romania's penalty didnt result in an italian red and nor did portugal's carvalho get a red at the world cup when he fouled henry who was awarded a penalty; carvalho got a yellow and thats what the french player should of got.if the last defender brings down an opposing player in the box then its a straight red card son.. and with the romania / italy game penatly the ref was right not to give panucci a red because he wasnt the last defender.that is not necessarily a rule as you two are making it seem to be; I see as Panucci didn't get a straight red because the foul didnt warrant such a harsh punishment (the severity of the tackle) and neither did the foul today.
^ so mauz, you think holland will lift the Euro then?