It's May 28, 2024, 08:05:04 AM
It's admirable that you've decided to not vote for the Democratic or Republican nominee. But the fact remains, it's a two party system, and one of those parties will win. Voting for any other party is essentially throwing away your vote. Look what happened in 2000, people voted for Nader, and some would argue, he stole votes from Gore. Even though Gore technically won anyways. The point is, Obama isn't that great, but McCain is worse. It's Obama or McCain. If you don't vote Obama, you automatically prefer McCain. And vis versa. Vote for the lesser of two evils. Voting for a 3rd party may make you feel like you did the right thing, but if the right person (Obama) doesn't win, you'll regret your vote for the rest of your life. McCain is a joke, and if he wins, America is screwed. People do this all the time in Canada. BC has the Marijuana party, which only issue is to legalize marijuana. And every election it gets a noticeable chunk of the vote, which may or may not affect who actually wins. We basically have a 5 party system, one party usually gets around 40%, and the rest usually split around 15% each. We have too many parties, and it often gets confusing who to vote for. Especially if your voting against something, rather then for something.It's McCain vs Obama. Voting for anyone else wouldn't be productive, because no matter what happens, a 3rd party will never win, nor will the system ever allow a 3 or more part system. Vote for the better man, for the sake of your country. Obama may not be what everyone thinks he will be, but it's far better then letting McCain steal the election.
I just don't see the logic behind the assumption that another vote for someone with a shit load of votes already would make a big difference
I was thinking of ways to make money and nearly every way I could think of involved selling my soul and working for some government program, government project, government funded employer... I even considered the fucking military which is just raping Iraq and Afganistan and many other countries... If we don't do something about this, pretty soon every job, major corporation, and business available to work for will be attatched to the government and subsidized and overseen by the government. My job now for example, I work in health care, and it's so screwed up because it's not even about providing proper care to the sick... but rather it's about covering you own ass and following government laws, guidelines, mandates, that hospitals have to follow to keep recieving money from the government. ...so then I look to work somewhere else, and everything I can think of is just more of the same, more government employment, more boondoggles, and so on...Not to mention I was recently catching up with some old friends from high school and they are all working in education (government education) or for insurance companies, drug companies, and complaining about all the bureaucracy and such that government brings.I don't care who's name is beside the ticket... MY VOTE WILL BE FOR THE LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATE OR CONSTITUTION PARTY CANDIDATE WHOEVER IT IS AND I DON'T CARE WHO WINS OR LOSES!...I don't know that my vote is worth that much but at least my support is one drop in the bucket. Peace.
^ It's a two part system because one of those two parties always wins, every time, every election in the last 100 or so years. I don't like the system, but I'm speaking to the situation. The system is really only designed to give two options. It's not really the peoples fault. It's the system.
How much has Obama spent? Over a 100 million? That's an insane amount of money. The system is built so only the two major parties can even raise enough money to compete.
In Canada (for example) theirs a party spending cap. Each party in a federal electron can only spend around 2 million dollars. So we can have many parties, and many people who can raise and spend to that cap. A more then two party system needs a spending cap. The dems spend hundreds millions, the repubs spend hundreds millions. What chance does a 3rd party have which can raise only a few million? It's all about money. Give me 10 million, give you 100,000$, I don't care who you are, I'll get more votes. Money buys elections, and the 3rd parties can't compete.
QuoteI just don't see the logic behind the assumption that another vote for someone with a shit load of votes already would make a big differenceThe logic is dependent on where you live. If you live in Hawaii, who you vote for doesn't matter, either way. If you live in Texas and you vote Dem, it doesn't matter because it's a "red" state, and probably will always will. But if you live in Ohio, or Florida, you're vote matters. Look at 2000, Nader rolled in the votes in Florida, and lost Gore the election. One state cost them the election. If enough people vote for the 3rd party, in a close state, it's all over. One person's vote isn't important. But if a lot of people feel that same way, the wrong person will win. The point I'm making is, Obama or McCain will win. Make your vote count. Voting for a 3rd party won't solve anything, and won't fix the system. Their will never be a three part system in our life times. You need to bit your tongue, and vote for one of the front runners.
And I wouldn't say Obama is evil, he's part of the system. The system is evil, not Obama.
McCain on the other hand, I would say is an evil person. Or Bush. Their war mongers, and have a very ignorant view of society outside of America. The country would be a lot better of with Obama, and millions of people voting for a 3rd party is just going to cost him the election.
I completely agree with your post, but the fact is, it's Obama or McCain, Repubs v Dems, and it always will be, no matter what we do. So pick the person you think is best qualified.