It's April 28, 2024, 03:40:16 PM
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too?
Quote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACe
Maybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LOL, Dwight averages 20 & 13!
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:28:03 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LOL, Dwight averages 20 & 13!and how many attempts does Dwight average in comparison to Bynum?
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 09, 2008, 12:11:44 AMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:28:03 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LOL, Dwight averages 20 & 13!and how many attempts does Dwight average in comparison to Bynum? well if Bynum was that good, they would try to get him takin 20 shots a game. you also have 3 other great/good players that take shots.but if Bynum was in Orlando he wouldnt fill Dwights shoes. Dwights so active, if Bynum tried that he would find himself on DL for the season.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 09, 2008, 12:11:44 AMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:28:03 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LOL, Dwight averages 20 & 13!and how many attempts does Dwight average in comparison to Bynum? well if Bynum was that good, they would try to get him takin 20 shots a game.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 09, 2008, 12:34:11 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 09, 2008, 12:11:44 AMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:28:03 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LOL, Dwight averages 20 & 13!and how many attempts does Dwight average in comparison to Bynum? well if Bynum was that good, they would try to get him takin 20 shots a game. The point of my previous OG topic was that he's playing so well as a teammate even if he ain't getting 20 shots a game.20.2 Bryant 14.2 Fisher10.5 Radmanovic10.5 Gasol9.0 Farmar8.0 Ariza8.0 Vujacic7.5 Odom6.7 Bynum4.0 Mihm1.7 Walton1.6 Powell^ This list right here (shots per game) is, along with a great new team defence Lakers is playing, the main reason why Lakers have a 4-0 record and looks unbeatable. We have our superstar Kobe Bryant talking 20 shots per game, and the rest of the team sharing the ball extremely well. And people are giving it all even if they ain't getting 15-20 shots per game like other superstars do.Radmanovic used to average 15-16 shots per game in Seattle and at the Clippers. Now he's shooting less, but this year, like i said, he improved on the defensive end and he's not playing like a role player only. He moves the ball, he defends, he plays triangle, he's studying to became a "real" starter. Stats don't mean shit for him. He's a better player than he was when he averaged 15-16 shots per game and scored always in double unit. Get it?Gasol is not taking 15-16 shots like he used to do in Memphis, but for sure he's a better player now. Even if he's averaging almost 10 points per game less than he did in Memphis.etc.. etc...That means Lakers have an excellent team chemistry, and that Phil Jackson's staff is working really great motivating those players to defend and play "so" well even if they ain't shooting like they used to do. I'm happy with Bynum shooting 6.75 times per game, honestly. If he continues to defend this way (almost 3 blocks per game) and to grab 17 rebounds like he did in his last game....... who needs him to score 20?LAKERS RANKS 1ST IN THE NBA IN POINTS PER GAME AVERAGING 105 PPG.AND THEY ARE THE BEST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN THE LEAGUE CONCEDING JUST 85 PPGChemistry is perfect this way.
Yeah, in NBA 2K9 their overall values are better than Bynum's ones.
Quote from: Antonio on November 09, 2008, 09:05:31 AMYeah, in NBA 2K9 their overall values are better than Bynum's ones. thats what i base all my opinons on.
2k9 iz
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 09, 2008, 10:34:47 AMQuote from: Antonio on November 09, 2008, 09:05:31 AMYeah, in NBA 2K9 their overall values are better than Bynum's ones. thats what i base all my opinons on. lmao...me 2 son... 2k9 iz