It's June 04, 2024, 08:48:54 PM
howard > yao > amare > Kyrylo Fesenko > bynum
Bynum isnt even as good as Gasol, so I dont see how the fuck he is better than Amare. Gasol is worse on D than Amare. Gasol is soft down low, but hes still a better player than Bynum right now. So yeahAmare>>>>>>Bynum or Gasolanyday
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LMAO
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too?
Quote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACe
Maybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no
BTW, anybody seen Bynum outplaying Yao last night? Bynum=13 points, 7 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals, 3 blocks, 1 turnoverYao=12 points, 8 rebounds, 0 assists, 1 steal, 1 block, 5 turnoversBynum is the real.
Quote from: GangstaBoogy on November 09, 2008, 11:05:22 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LMAOwhat's so funny? you'd trade Bynum for Dwight? Did you even watch Dwight in the Olympics? LMAO@you.
. If the Lakers had Howard we would've already had a ring.
Quote from: GangstaBoogy on November 10, 2008, 02:25:39 PM. If the Lakers had Howard we would've already had a ring.Howard or Amare, the Lakers would have a ring, no doubt.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 10, 2008, 02:00:49 PMQuote from: GangstaBoogy on November 09, 2008, 11:05:22 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 11:24:44 PMQuote from: Chamillitary Click on November 08, 2008, 11:17:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on November 08, 2008, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: wcsoldier on November 07, 2008, 11:18:38 PMMaybe with simple words it will work : Amare is WAY better than Bynum on the offensive end so if u need scoring of course you will go with Amare... but some B-Balls fans as Antonio and me prefer complete players than one-dimensional ones ... AND as of now the Lakers need more a Bynum type of player than Amare .... as Chamilitary Click said if u need a 1st option on a wack team , Amare is a no brainer over Bynum Spice : Briedrins is putting some impressive numbers I agree with this but again this is just after 5 games and the Warriors need him to score and rbs crazy coz he's the only solid interior presence for the team ... Another example : the Spurs needs TP to score a lot of points to stay in the game in Gino absence , Duncan needs to score near 30 a game aswell ... TP leads the NBA in scoring and Tim is not far behind , does that mean they are better scorers than Kobe, Lebron , Wade ? hell no The point is, Amare is NOT way better on the offensive end...those stats he's putting up are good, but it doesn't prove much when all the offense is running through him. What is Amare better than Bynum at? Exploding. Everything else goes to Bynum...Bynum has better footwork, better back-to-the-basket game, better post moves. Amare scores the bulk of his points off of rebounds and lob passes. so the common misconception of Amare being a WAY better scorer is totally false when you take into account that Bynum is only shooting 6 shots a game and would be averging 20 points a game in a primary offensive role...but he's our defensive anchor and we have a gang of scorers, so Bynum is not gunna be running as much offense as Amare, which DOES NOT mean he's not as capable a scorer, get it? Keep in mind that Bynum was leading the leage in FG% before he got injured last season...muthafucka is efficient as hell. The center of the future...PeACeso Bynum is better than Dwight Howard too? I think Dwight is as overrated as Amare, if not more...no way I'd trade Bynum for him.LMAOwhat's so funny? you'd trade Bynum for Dwight? Did you even watch Dwight in the Olympics? LMAO@you.Whats so funny is...Bynum's best year: 07-0813ppg, 10rpg, 1apg, 2bpg - in 35 gamesHoward's WORST year: 04-05 (rookie year)12ppg, 10pg, 0apg, 1bpg - in 82 games^ meaning, Bynum on his best day hasn't fucked with Dwight Howard's rookie year. And don't give me that bullshit about age cuz Howard is only 2 years older than Bynum. He's just a better player. What did Howard put up last year? 20ppg, 14rpg, 1apg, 2bpg and played all 82 games for the 4th year in a row. If the Lakers had Howard we would've already had a ring.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on November 10, 2008, 02:04:56 PMBTW, anybody seen Bynum outplaying Yao last night? Bynum=13 points, 7 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals, 3 blocks, 1 turnoverYao=12 points, 8 rebounds, 0 assists, 1 steal, 1 block, 5 turnoversBynum is the real. Wow Bynum is the real cuz he had 13 points and 7 rebounds LMAO...Yao had a pretty shitty game dude.