Author Topic: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs  (Read 930 times)

GimmeYourShoes

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
  • Karma: 68
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #15 on: June 20, 2009, 08:24:56 AM »
That's what you get for fucking with RIAA-Mafia.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/v/S_oMD6-6q5Y&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" target="_blank" class="new_win">http://www.youtube.com/v/S_oMD6-6q5Y&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6</a>
 

J.D. Wykid, Esq.

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
  • Karma: 405
  • Id rather be rich n unhappy than poor n miserable
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2009, 04:07:30 AM »
thats nice...sue a mother of four for money she most likely doesnt have and will never have.

good job. 



'Oh I can't see him, I can't see God', YA'LL CAN'T SEE FUCKIN' AIR NEITHER!
Quote from: QuietTruth
Prove to me the wind. Show me the wind man. I want proof of that shit. Cuz I don't see it.
 

virtuoso

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3048
  • Karma: 333
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #17 on: June 21, 2009, 09:48:44 AM »
thats nice...sue a mother of four for money she most likely doesnt have and will never have.

good job. 

Right, it's extortion on a level which makes your head spin. Perhaps now is an appropriate moment for artists to counter sue these music corporations for extorting them. I find it bewildering that the music labels would pursue this course of action when the largest aspect of the battle being waged is a pr battle and on that level, they couldn't have possibly scored a bigger own goal. I do stand by what I said regarding every criminal action like this leading to a reaction from most people which only reaffirms their hate and in turn ratchets up the level of defiance. In fact when the music conglomerate decided to focus their attentions on Pirate Bay, what happened within the space of a day was the number of people who downloaded pirate bay increased markedly. I think this is just indicative of why the music labels can not win their battle with extortion, threatening behaviour and hardcore draconian policies. The only way they can win this is to give everyone a fairer deal, that means stop screwing the artists, recognise that downloading has created a much larger profit margin to be achieved because of the elimination of so many costs that go hand in hand with conventional distribution systems and therefore have this reflected in the prices. I still see albums costing 10.00 (sterling) to download, that figure is crazy.

As it is this is just another self inflicted wound by the music industry and if they don't recognise the landscape in which they are operating in, they certainly won't hit a main artery but they will continue to suffer.
 

OchoCinco

  • Guest
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #18 on: June 21, 2009, 10:36:56 AM »
y the fuck wouldnt they go after the big sites like albumhunt n shit rather then waste time doin this?
 

S P I C E

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1890
  • Karma: 33
  • LOOK WHO'S BACK
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #19 on: June 22, 2009, 12:17:12 AM »
Hopefully this case makes it's way to the Supreme Court so this waste of time BS case can be thrown out.  What a joke this is!


DIP DIP SET SET
 

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10961
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 2931
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #20 on: June 22, 2009, 02:46:26 AM »
y the fuck wouldnt they go after the big sites like albumhunt n shit rather then waste time doin this?
they could, but you know that a new site will come anyway.

AnybodyKilla

Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #21 on: June 22, 2009, 02:59:22 AM »
y the fuck wouldnt they go after the big sites like albumhunt n shit rather then waste time doin this?
 

Chad Vader

  • Guest
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #22 on: June 22, 2009, 03:41:14 AM »
labels can't stop downloading ;)



but downloading can stop labels from investing in music...
 

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10961
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 2931
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #23 on: June 22, 2009, 03:54:05 AM »
labels can't stop downloading ;)



but downloading can stop labels from investing in music...

well they were sleeping: technology wasn't.

hence i blame them more than the downloaders

Moe

  • Guest
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #24 on: June 22, 2009, 03:57:42 AM »
labels can't stop downloading ;)



but downloading can stop labels from investing in music...

well they were sleeping: technology wasn't.

hence i blame them more than the downloaders

theres no way they would have been ready for downloading.
 

Nutty

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2312
  • Karma: 100
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2009, 03:59:16 AM »
Hopefully this case makes it's way to the Supreme Court so this waste of time BS case can be thrown out.  What a joke this is!

You should represent her.
 

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10961
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 2931
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2009, 04:01:10 AM »
labels can't stop downloading ;)



but downloading can stop labels from investing in music...

well they were sleeping: technology wasn't.

hence i blame them more than the downloaders

theres no way they would have been ready for downloading.
they could have adapted to it more, in stead of turning their backs to it.


mak-rev

  • Lil Geezy
  • *
  • Posts: 72
  • Karma: 23
  • Mak-rev
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #27 on: June 22, 2009, 04:05:33 AM »
if she had settled out of court she would be fine, why would she go to trail the record company will automatically win more money better lawyers.

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10961
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 2931
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #28 on: June 22, 2009, 11:35:28 AM »
labels can't stop downloading
but downloading can stop labels from investing in music
well,they where sleeping,hence I blame them

still sleeping,in meanwhile shit is colapsing


well fuck them, cause hiphop doesn't need majors to survive

TraceOneInfinite Flat Earther 96'

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 13891
  • Thanked: 455 times
  • Karma: -1635
  • Permanent Resident Flat Erth 1996 Pre-Sept. 13th
Re: Woman Charged $1.92 Million For Downloading 24 songs
« Reply #29 on: June 22, 2009, 06:59:17 PM »
lol thats a bit excessive


why is our court system hearing this shit?

it is illegal though.  It is stealing.  That music was created by somebody else and it's being stolen.  It's killing the music industry... no telling how much great music is not going to ever be created because of it.  I'm serious, I know we like gettin free shit, but you got to be real, how is it any different from walking in a record store and stealing?
Givin' respect to 2pac September 7th-13th The Day Hip-Hop Died

(btw, Earth 🌎 is not a spinning water ball)