LOL, the Bills suck!

["THE" MoSav]

^yeah, but since they stayed Cover 2 that was poor defense in my opinon.

you know when the other team is down 11 with 5 mintues to go, they HAVE to be passing.

give up the short stuff & prevent the deep ball, which didn't happen.

they didnt give up the deep ball all night.the Bills outplayed the Pats and had Brady out of rhythm all day they did a great job only givin up short passes on that 2nd to last drive, they played great just made one key mistake...Speaking of which McKelvin got his lawn destroyed by vandalism

It was just a couple of kids from the neighbourhood. They were obviously emotional hurt and right after the game they spray painted the score and some words on his lawn. Another neighbour the next morning cut the lawn to get rid of it. McKelvin will not press charges. He knows he fucked up and he knows those kids fucked up. They may get a slap on the wrist for it. Let's hope he can take it to Tampa next week.

As for the Final drive, before the fumble, they did play well and they did outplay the Pats all game. I don't think it would have been possible to stop the Pats from getting into the endzone that drive. What they could have done better was make them take a longer time to get there. They should not have blitzed at all. Let the front 4 handle the line and then the LB corps can stop the YAC. The cover three was also essential on their half of the field. It would have prevented that Watson TD. The Pats still would have probably got in because Randy was running routes like a champ and Brady was firing on target but it would have been closer to 1 minute left than two minutes left and that would have been the difference. No way does McKelvin come out of the endzone with a minute to go. They still could have gotten an onside kick but whatever. The mistake was the defensive style on that last big drive. It was a coaching failure And I think they know that.
All that being said, the next time they play it'll be Christmas time in Buffalo and Kelsay, Lynch and Poz should all be back. My money is on the Bills that week. It may be fr a playoff spot, it may just be an underdog 4-10 Bills out for blood. But the Bills are going to win that game. I'm calling it now (unless they lose a bunch more guys in the coming weeks).

I dont think so, i dont think Buffalo could have played any better and still lost. Pats will make the adjustments and win by 10 plus

So you think Poz and Kelsay staying in the whole game and Lynch running wouldn't have meant anything in last week's game? Lynch alone would have extended a few of those drives. And Kelsay in the game would have meant no need to blitz at the end with Poz protecting the short middle and with out a doubt prolonging the first TD pass. I'll accept the argument that the Pats could adjust and win game 2 but to say that the Bills were at their best Monday night is ridiculous. You don't lose your MLB, a top DE, and play with out your #1 RB and play as good as you possibly can.

GOOD POINT, BUT THEY STILL PLAYED ABOVE THEMSELVES..LYNCH ALSO WOULDNT HAVE MADE SOME OF THE PLAYS ON THOSE SCREEN PASSES THATJACKSON DID SO U CAN ARGUE THAT EITHER WAY....POZ AND KELS WAS A HUGE LOSS

Look, I might like Peyton a lot, but I'm a Bills guy. I don't think you see any Bills games a year outide of the odd Monday night game. I see every single Bills game, and have seen them since '88. Fred Jackson was going to play and be the screen pass back anyway. What they lost from Lynch was their power run. All those 3rd and longs would have been a better shot at being third and short. Both and Lynch and Jackson can run and catch he ball. It's a two back system but Jackson does not have the strength to move the line like Lynch does. And the huge difference is if Lynch is the game then McKelvin knows they have a real shot at running for 4 yards a carry and making the first down.

They might lose the next game, but no way in hell do the Bills lose on Monday if Lynch was playing. He's as important to the Bills offense as Welker is to the Pats right now. And I think I can say safely that if Welker went down in that game his replacement would not have made the same plays.

i have the ticket, but no i dont see every play like you. Its youre team you should know them better. I did know they had a 2 back system, i was just proving a point that Jackson made alot of great plays in the passing game, and obviolsy Lynch is the power guy, i think hes fantastic, but u cant honestly tell me the Pats looked good and they still won..

[Shallow]

^yeah, but since they stayed Cover 2 that was poor defense in my opinon.

you know when the other team is down 11 with 5 mintues to go, they HAVE to be passing.

give up the short stuff & prevent the deep ball, which didn't happen.

they didnt give up the deep ball all night.the Bills outplayed the Pats and had Brady out of rhythm all day they did a great job only givin up short passes on that 2nd to last drive, they played great just made one key mistake...Speaking of which McKelvin got his lawn destroyed by vandalism

It was just a couple of kids from the neighbourhood. They were obviously emotional hurt and right after the game they spray painted the score and some words on his lawn. Another neighbour the next morning cut the lawn to get rid of it. McKelvin will not press charges. He knows he fucked up and he knows those kids fucked up. They may get a slap on the wrist for it. Let's hope he can take it to Tampa next week.

As for the Final drive, before the fumble, they did play well and they did outplay the Pats all game. I don't think it would have been possible to stop the Pats from getting into the endzone that drive. What they could have done better was make them take a longer time to get there. They should not have blitzed at all. Let the front 4 handle the line and then the LB corps can stop the YAC. The cover three was also essential on their half of the field. It would have prevented that Watson TD. The Pats still would have probably got in because Randy was running routes like a champ and Brady was firing on target but it would have been closer to 1 minute left than two minutes left and that would have been the difference. No way does McKelvin come out of the endzone with a minute to go. They still could have gotten an onside kick but whatever. The mistake was the defensive style on that last big drive. It was a coaching failure And I think they know that.
All that being said, the next time they play it'll be Christmas time in Buffalo and Kelsay, Lynch and Poz should all be back. My money is on the Bills that week. It may be fr a playoff spot, it may just be an underdog 4-10 Bills out for blood. But the Bills are going to win that game. I'm calling it now (unless they lose a bunch more guys in the coming weeks).

I dont think so, i dont think Buffalo could have played any better and still lost. Pats will make the adjustments and win by 10 plus

So you think Poz and Kelsay staying in the whole game and Lynch running wouldn't have meant anything in last week's game? Lynch alone would have extended a few of those drives. And Kelsay in the game would have meant no need to blitz at the end with Poz protecting the short middle and with out a doubt prolonging the first TD pass. I'll accept the argument that the Pats could adjust and win game 2 but to say that the Bills were at their best Monday night is ridiculous. You don't lose your MLB, a top DE, and play with out your #1 RB and play as good as you possibly can.

GOOD POINT, BUT THEY STILL PLAYED ABOVE THEMSELVES..LYNCH ALSO WOULDNT HAVE MADE SOME OF THE PLAYS ON THOSE SCREEN PASSES THATJACKSON DID SO U CAN ARGUE THAT EITHER WAY....POZ AND KELS WAS A HUGE LOSS

Look, I might like Peyton a lot, but I'm a Bills guy. I don't think you see any Bills games a year outide of the odd Monday night game. I see every single Bills game, and have seen them since '88. Fred Jackson was going to play and be the screen pass back anyway. What they lost from Lynch was their power run. All those 3rd and longs would have been a better shot at being third and short. Both and Lynch and Jackson can run and catch he ball. It's a two back system but Jackson does not have the strength to move the line like Lynch does. And the huge difference is if Lynch is the game then McKelvin knows they have a real shot at running for 4 yards a carry and making the first down.

They might lose the next game, but no way in hell do the Bills lose on Monday if Lynch was playing. He's as important to the Bills offense as Welker is to the Pats right now. And I think I can say safely that if Welker went down in that game his replacement would not have made the same plays.

i have the ticket, but no i dont see every play like you. Its youre team you should know them better. I did know they had a 2 back system, i was just proving a point that Jackson made alot of great plays in the passing game, and obviolsy Lynch is the power guy, i think hes fantastic, but u cant honestly tell me the Pats looked good and they still won..

The Pats didn't look good for the entire game minus the second last drive. My point isn't that the '07 Pats would have lost to these Bills with Lynch, Poz and Kels. My point is that the 09 Pats, so far, would have lost to these Bills. If they come out tomorrow and walk over the Jets then maybe it was just a bad day for NE, but if they look like shit tomorrow, win or lose, then maybe this is simply the new Pats.

["THE" MoSav]

Nice win for the Bills\, started there d in fantasy did a nice job for me. Thanks for that td Whittner..!!!