Which stat line is better?! (NBA)

[.:DaYg0sTyLz:.]

This is just a test to see what you guys value in a players overall game. Dont overthink it as these are just generic stats I came up with. Just your first impression. And lets assume Player 1 and Player 2 both scored a LOT of points...but Player 2 scored a little more, about, 1.15 points for every 1 point that Player 1 scored (in other words, if Player 1 scored 20 points...Player 2 scored 23. If Player 1 scored 30 points...Player 2 scored 34 points, etc). Also, in this test...to keep things in perspective, Player 1 is a bigman....Player 2 is a perimeter guy.


                   Min.    FG%  REB  ASSTS  BLKS  STLS  
Player 1        44    .634    14      5        2        0    
Player 2       42     .608     6       2        1        3    

[LooN3y]

This is just a test to see what you guys value in a players overall game. Dont overthink it as these are just generic stats I came up with. Just your first impression. And lets assume Player 1 and Player 2 both scored a LOT of points...but Player 2 scored a little more, about, 1.15 points for every 1 point that Player 1 scored (in other words, if Player 1 scored 20 points...Player 2 scored 23. If Player 1 scored 30 points...Player 2 scored 34 points, etc). Also, in this test...to keep things in perspective, Player 1 is a bigman....Player 2 is a perimeter guy.


                   Min.    FG%  REB  ASSTS  BLKS  STLS  
Player 1        44    .634    14      5        2        0    
Player 2       42     .608     6       2        1        3    

rather take the big man gettin 5 assits and double doubles

[IRAN iz Gangsta!]

its obviously 2 different types of players so its unfair to compare......but stat wise you have to go with player 1

[.:DaYg0sTyLz:.]

This is just a test to see what you guys value in a players overall game. Dont overthink it as these are just generic stats I came up with. Just your first impression. And lets assume Player 1 and Player 2 both scored a LOT of points...but Player 2 scored a little more, about, 1.15 points for every 1 point that Player 1 scored (in other words, if Player 1 scored 20 points...Player 2 scored 23. If Player 1 scored 30 points...Player 2 scored 34 points, etc). Also, in this test...to keep things in perspective, Player 1 is a bigman....Player 2 is a perimeter guy.


                   Min.    FG%  REB  ASSTS  BLKS  STLS  
Player 1        44    .634    14      5        2        0    
Player 2       42     .608     6       2        1        3    

rather take the big man gettin 5 assits and double doubles

Not to sway your thinkin...but also remember, Player 2 will have scored more points.

[Chamillitary Click]

I'm feeling the big man.

[Sccit]

as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.

[.:DaYg0sTyLz:.]

as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.

So youre stickin with that?

Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...

[Sccit]

as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.

So youre stickin with that?

Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...

of course stats, in some cases, could help SUPPORT an argument...but they should never be the main argument as to why someone is better or someone played better. ive always held this belief.

[Chamillitary Click]

as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.

So youre stickin with that?

Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...

of course stats, in some cases, could help SUPPORT an argument...but they should never be the main argument as to why someone is better or someone played better. ive always held this belief.

Did this belief come into affect AFTER a certain someone who averages 30, 7 & 7 was drafted?

[Sccit]

as a stat line, of course the first one looks better...but any true basketball head knows that a stat-line does not determine exactly how much a player has contributed on the court. a lot of factors don't even make the stat-line when it's all said and done. so yea, stat-line 1 looks better, but stats are in no way an indication of who played better.

So youre stickin with that?

Im just sayin, whether stats determine how great somebody played or not...you have to stick with that. Dont come back later on and use stats in some sort of argument for you know who...

of course stats, in some cases, could help SUPPORT an argument...but they should never be the main argument as to why someone is better or someone played better. ive always held this belief.

Did this belief come into affect AFTER a certain someone who averages 30, 7 & 7 was drafted?

did you realize that i don't even take you serious enough to respond to your basketball related posts? LOL. come on, cham, do yourself the favor..

[Chamillitary Click]

^Obviously. You have no response for me. It's a classic NIK move, to just act like somebody else has no clue what their talking about.

Just look through your old posts, all your arguments are "LOL, YOU'RE DELUSIONAL", "LOL, YOU'RE A MORON", "LOL, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BASKETBALL" & that's your counter argument to anyone's argument & then just speak your biased ass opinion.

Cap letter the "LOL" or "LMFAO" to show as if you're geniunley finding it funny & to give off some appeal as if what you're saying is "obviously" right.

You're act got old years ago & is beyond simple to figure out; just look at your continuous arguments with Daygo right now lmfao.

[Sccit]

^Obviously. You have no response for me. It's a classic NIK move, to just act like somebody else has no clue what their talking about.

Just look through your old posts, all your arguments are "LOL, YOU'RE DELUSIONAL", "LOL, YOU'RE A MORON", "LOL, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BASKETBALL" & that's your counter argument to anyone's argument & then just speak your biased ass opinion.

Cap letter the "LOL" or "LMFAO" to show as if you're geniunley finding it funny & to give off some appeal as if what you're saying is "obviously" right.

You're act got old years ago & is beyond simple to figure out; just look at your continuous arguments with Daygo right now lmfao.

I still respond/debate with people on here, even ones who share opposite views (daygo, 7even). you're just simply a fucking moron, and if anyone here disagrees, please say something................

[.:DaYg0sTyLz:.]

^Obviously. You have no response for me. It's a classic NIK move, to just act like somebody else has no clue what their talking about.

Just look through your old posts, all your arguments are "LOL, YOU'RE DELUSIONAL", "LOL, YOU'RE A MORON", "LOL, YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BASKETBALL" & that's your counter argument to anyone's argument & then just speak your biased ass opinion.

Cap letter the "LOL" or "LMFAO" to show as if you're geniunley finding it funny & to give off some appeal as if what you're saying is "obviously" right.

You're act got old years ago & is beyond simple to figure out; just look at your continuous arguments with Daygo right now lmfao.

I still respond/debate with people on here, even ones who share opposite views (daygo, 7even). you're just simply a fucking moron, and if anyone here disagrees, please say something................

I dont see Cham as a moron, just a difference of opinions. No big deal.

Now being a Budden fan on the other hand....

[Sccit]

^you honestly think dude knows his basketball? LOL

[.:DaYg0sTyLz:.]

^you honestly think dude knows his basketball? LOL

Are we grading on a curve? Cham has made it clear that basketball isnt his number one sport. Im sure he knows more about basketball than you know about any other sport but basketball.