Poll

Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?

Yes
No
Undecided
I Hate Dre
I Hate Nate Dogg
  

Author Topic: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?  (Read 9309 times)

Portugoal

  • Guest
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #30 on: December 29, 2010, 04:52:09 AM »
Anyone misunderstanding what my point was....
Go back & read my first post. If you're going to have ANYONE copy someone else's trademark sound (especially a collaborator), at least give him a shoutout in the song. Get it ? Hell...even D.O.C. was able to ghostwrite HIMSELF a shoutout in Nuthin' But A G Thang.
I'm not saying he should build a bronze sculpture of him or rename Detox..Nate Dogg. Just show the man a little respect.  ;)
exactly!
let's not forget that Nate Dogg is also depressed.
i hope he doesn't hear the song

You gossip like a bitch, lol
 

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10961
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 2919
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #31 on: December 29, 2010, 04:53:37 AM »
Damizza revealed that

Portugoal

  • Guest
 

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10961
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 2919
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #33 on: December 29, 2010, 04:58:54 AM »

Portugoal

  • Guest
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #34 on: December 29, 2010, 06:35:18 AM »
 

Sir Petey

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7634
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Karma: 714
  • ♛ bitch I'm flawless ♛
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #35 on: December 29, 2010, 08:15:36 AM »
Yes, def disrespectful.  But Dre is a homosexual devil worshipper so I'd expect nothing less.
The illuminati do not exist, lmfao.

Doesn't change the fact that Dre is a homesexual :firedevil: worshipper.
  :loco:

it's amazing how lemming-people cling so ignorantly to hear-say & asinine horse-shit rumors when there's never any hard-proof or facts that would be necessary to enable the right or appropriate reasonable frame-of-mind or conviction to really say something like that & mean it genuinely w/o truly knowing for yourself, surely, first-hand to actually determine or discern weather or not shit like that could possibly be true. people like you just like to bring attention to themselves because life for you isn't interesting or creative enough on your own w/o lies & confusion. in essence The Illuminati has a better chance of existing in the way that most people want to believe it does, than Dre being an actual practicing homo-sexual Satanist is. first of all he has a wife & a LOT of kids w/ her not to mention all his MANY other children born out of wed-lock, so right there your claims of homo-sexuality immediately fall apart... ::)

and the only "god" or symbol that Dre would pray or worship to would be THE Almighty $ (DOLLAR)  sign.
after all he AIN'T TRYIN' TO STICK AROUND FOR ILLUMINATI  :monkey_dance2::raisetheroof: :monkey:


Shut your groupie ass up, your a fucking windbag and worse then any of the eurostans I've everseen...all your bullshit long winded posts could be wrapped up in two sentances. Get a life fuckhead.

I am however glad you heeded the majority of this forums advice and changed that queer ass avatar you had of dre in his body suit.

Darkwing Duck (The Reincarnation)

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #36 on: December 29, 2010, 08:20:53 AM »
i dont think it was direspectful. at least, it wasnt intended to b..

but a shoutout on the song wouldve been more politically correct, yes.

but Dre did shout out Nate, on the Big Boi radio show..


 

Dre-Day

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10961
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Karma: 2919
  • No justice, no peace
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #37 on: December 29, 2010, 10:55:53 AM »
Damizza revealed that

... a few months ago
yeah so? doesn't mean it's not accurate anymore.

and neither does it mean it is still accurate
well you said gossip, which is bullshit.

nate dogg is slowly recovering, sure we have no confirmation that he's still depressed, but you don't need it to figure out that he has a long way to go.

nate may be a different person than The D.O.C. but look how long it took for him to pull himself together, after the car accident.

Hittman2001

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #38 on: December 29, 2010, 11:11:57 AM »
where's the "who gives a shit" option?
 

MOON KNIGHT

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #39 on: December 29, 2010, 11:34:11 AM »
where's the "who gives a shit" option?

Here it is...

Who Gives A Shit about YOUR opinion  :laugh:
 

Smackdog

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1295
  • Karma: -101
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #40 on: December 29, 2010, 11:55:59 AM »
If you don't give a shit.........then that means you would not vote or post here........



so apparently yall care a little bit...



"If you see me on a solo move believe that I'm strapped"  - dr. dre

"as he wondered what popped before he got popped, I told you this is dre and you know it dont stop"
"don't choke,  if you do,  you  have no clue, of what me and my homeboy Snoop dogg came to do"
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #41 on: December 29, 2010, 01:09:51 PM »
Very disrespectful.

1. It's misleading cuz we all thought it was Nate at first
2. He could've atleast wore a "get well soon Nate Dogg" shirt in the video or somethin.

But its Dre, not surprised at all.
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

Jimmy H.

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #42 on: December 29, 2010, 09:52:32 PM »
You can have five-thousand people say it was disrespectful. If Nate Dogg doesn't agree then who gives a shit? I swear some of you could find a way to put a negative spin on volunteering at a soup kitchen.
 

Hittman2001

Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #43 on: December 29, 2010, 10:10:22 PM »
i mean at the end of the day its just a song...thats all....a song....being disrespectul towards nate would be totally omitting his "presence" altogether.  its obvious Dre knew what he was doing having sly sound like that....it was to pay homage to him.


so really....no need to catch feelings over what i posted
 

Muhfukka

  • Guest
Re: Was It Disrespectful To Include A Nate Dogg Soundalike On Kush ?
« Reply #44 on: December 29, 2010, 10:45:54 PM »
i dont know about disrespectful but its kinda lame...it sounds like him but not exactly and it makes you wonder why they didnt get someone different