It's April 27, 2024, 04:13:25 AM
NHL does rotate but the risk of injury is far greater in it then soccer. Soccer isn't a physical sport, thiers less wear and tear on players. Your not getting bodychecked, hacked with a stick and punched.and during a shift you don't see players barely moving, thier constantly moving at high speed. Where as soccer every player isn't always moving at a highspeed constantly.The risk of injury in the NFL and NHL far surpasses every other sport, because thier physical sports.Every other sport keeps playing until one team wins, as it should be. They risk injury in far greater amounts then soccer. Injury risk is a lame excuse to not keep playing when the two more brutal sports do it.It's lame, and blasphemous to the sport. No other league does it and for good reason
Javier, I do realize that. But, if you've played hockey you'd know it's very physically demanding. Games are only scheduled for three periods, but I've seen games go into seven periods and then the team playing the very next night. That's true determination and brings out the man in a person. If you follow hockey at all you'd see as soon as a team gets eliminated all of the players injuries are revealed. When the flyers were eliminated they had seven players have to have surgeries, and those seven players were all playing. When the Canucks lost game seven they had a plethora of injuries as well, one player playing through groin tears and hip problems.in game five they lost a forward to a fractured vertebrae. You can look at any team and it's the same.The injuries are not the same. Every few games you see players leaving the ice on stretchers with concussions. An accidental collision is not the same as a player being bodychecked by a 230 lb man repeatedly throughout the game.If every other sport can handle it so can they. It just further enforces the reputation of soccer players being soft.It's a terrible way to end a game.
Imagine the club's reaction if they were to see their prize signing play a 180 minute game. It doesn't make sense physically.
cham just watch ur baseball and eat a dick at the same time
lol, why is this guy defending injuries in Soccer? You have the same chance of getting injured in Soccer in the first 30 seconds or in the 130th minute. Injuries are no reason to say you can't play longer when injuries are Soccer are the result of some cheap hit or freak accident.Quote from: Javier on July 20, 2011, 02:31:04 PMImagine the club's reaction if they were to see their prize signing play a 180 minute game. It doesn't make sense physically. Just for the World Cup & games leading up to it.
i'm not the biggest fan of penalty kicks but you're exaggerating a bit when you call that "pure luck each". It's more than that. It takes courage, skills and mental stability to take penalty kicks. That's why there are nations that are notoriously bad at penalty kicks (Italy, England) and nations that are fucking unbeatable (Germany never lost any penalty kick session ever), if that was pure luck the stats would be even for each team. That's a psychological thing more than anything. Basically i view things like this : if you win the penalty kicks, you have proved to be the most capable under pressure, you have shown character and values. It's based on intuition, self-confidence and skills... of course without skills you can still score a penalty kick, but you're more likely to fold under pressure, especially at a crucial moment like that. now a well-taken penalty can never be stopped, and that's what the germans are excellent at.