Your Top 10 SGs Of The 2000s

[Hack Wilson - real]

i love how all the gay whiteboys stick up for eachother in this section...plant, cham, and hack aka the crackerfags of the sports section.

a jew calling other people white?



now that is funny


"I'm the white kobe" - NIK age 15 on this very forum

[Sccit]

Lol @ bringing race into this. C'mon man.

u serious?...how many times have u heard these nutriders come through with that "jew" bs outta nowhere. just type in "jew" in the dubcc search n see what comes up...race been brought into this a longass time ago, cud.

[Sccit]

i love how all the gay whiteboys stick up for eachother in this section...plant, cham, and hack aka the crackerfags of the sports section.

a jew calling other people white?



now that is funny


"I'm the white kobe" - NIK age 15 on this very forum

jews can be any race/ethnicity, idiot. judaism is a religion smh....n why u gotta make up dumbass quotes when u got nothin 2 say, crack? man up

[Hack Wilson - real]

i love how all the gay whiteboys stick up for eachother in this section...plant, cham, and hack aka the crackerfags of the sports section.

a jew calling other people white?



now that is funny


"I'm the white kobe" - NIK age 15 on this very forum

jews can be any race/ethnicity, idiot. judaism is a religion smh....n why u gotta make up dumbass quotes when u got nothin 2 say, crack? man up

im not making that quote up buddy boy

in fact i'd even go find the quote but you would just deny it even after lmao


now get your jewass to a synagog, its saturday son

[Sccit]

i love how all the gay whiteboys stick up for eachother in this section...plant, cham, and hack aka the crackerfags of the sports section.

a jew calling other people white?



now that is funny


"I'm the white kobe" - NIK age 15 on this very forum

jews can be any race/ethnicity, idiot. judaism is a religion smh....n why u gotta make up dumbass quotes when u got nothin 2 say, crack? man up

im not making that quote up buddy boy

in fact i'd even go find the quote but you would just deny it even after lmao


now get your jewass to a synagog, its saturday son

lol...yes, crack. when i was 14 i said "people have told me i look like a whiter kobe". never said anything about being "the white kobe".


ima go pray for u...to hop off. my dick AND cham's. i cant tell who's ur currently ridin harder.

[Chamillitary Click]

I'm not even getting involved in this tangent. That's what NIK does when he's wrong.

Anyway, NIK. You had no point. You wanted to say "Hahahaha, Oscar > Lebron, the numbers prove it". Not only does that mean I could say LeBron > Kobe, the numbers prove it lol, but then you tried to tell me I was a psycho for thinking the 60's was worse competition. Hack comes in says "LOL, THE 60S HAD GOOD COMPETITION" & you were like "obviously not as good competition", but at the same time you're telling me that the competition was great lmao.

Well if you can admit that the 60's was worse competition, obviously that's why you don't have big men (Wilt) scoring 60-100 points every few games & don't have Oscar putting up better than James numbers. & if you're really sticking behind that the 60's was the best of the best, then Russell obviously had the greatest career of all-time. Pick one, dumbass. Fairly simple.

[Hack Wilson - real]

on point

[Sccit]

I'm not even getting involved in this tangent. That's what NIK does when he's wrong.

Anyway, NIK. You had no point. You wanted to say "Hahahaha, Oscar > Lebron, the numbers prove it". Not only does that mean I could say LeBron > Kobe, the numbers prove it lol, but then you tried to tell me I was a psycho for thinking the 60's was worse competition. Hack comes in says "LOL, THE 60S HAD GOOD COMPETITION" & you were like "obviously not as good competition", but at the same time you're telling me that the competition was great lmao.

Well if you can admit that the 60's was worse competition, obviously that's why you don't have big men (Wilt) scoring 60-100 points every few games & don't have Oscar putting up better than James numbers. & if you're really sticking behind that the 60's was the best of the best, then Russell obviously had the greatest career of all-time. Pick one, dumbass. Fairly simple.

not my fault that u missed the point, due to lack of common sense, young biebs....point was that if ur going by numbers, which is what YOU'RE known for doing (not me), then u'd have to say Robertson>LeBron. ur so insecure that u don't read whats right in front of ur face, u simply take shit out of context and put words in peoples mouths like some paranoid closet-homo. never once did i say anything about Robertson being better than LeBron due to having better numbers, thats just what u ASSUMED. all that was implied was that if YOU want to go off of numbers, u'd have to acknowledge Robertson as greater than LeBron, as well as many other greats who have played in the league...so slow ur roll, homochild, and quit getting ahead of urself like the anxious ass lil faggot that u are. see, i never once compared the 60's competition to todays competition and i never said anything relatively close to ur made up quote of mine, "(60s) obviously wasnt as good competition (as today)". that is all in ur homoass paranoid mind. so when u learn to argue whats in front of u, instead of fabricating a bunch of lies (like u do in EVERY SINGLE back-n-forth we've ever had), then u might approach my level...as of now, u aint even close.



and lol@crack saying "on point"...like, who didnt see that one cumming?? smh@the board buttbuddies

[Hack Wilson - real]

damn CHAM u r a dumb nigga according to nik

[Chamillitary Click]

That was a bunch of bullshit "you're an idiot, you're gay" mixed in with zero substance. You said absolutely nothing relative & completely got away from the discussion.

BOTTOM LINE, YOU FUCKING IDIOT, we're both acknowledging that the 60's was a much weaker time to play than now. People dominated the game then like they simply cannot today. So Oscar's stats, like Wilt's aren't real. It's like in Baseball, when random guys from 1892 hold records. Sure, we acknowledge it, but we all know Pujols is simply better. He puts up ridiculous stats, better than anyone in a league where the game is far more developed. THEREFORE, Oscar's numbers are better, but the fact he played in a weak state of the NBA & average impossible numbers takes away from it. A lot away from it.

I don't see the difficulty in what you fail to grasp.

1. YOU SAID, "Oscar's numbers are better, therefore he's better than LeBron."
2. I SAID, "That would be true if Oscar didn't play in the 60's when the competition was weak."
3. YOU named fifteen players to say, "Cham, you're an idiot. Some of the greatest players of all-time played then & there was TONS of competition." (You really going to deny that?)

gayboy, my point was that robertson didn't play against "weak" competition...........robertson's era was competitive, obviously, based on the players i listed alone.

LOL, son. What does that mean? You're defending the 60's to solidify your claim that Oscar played in a competitive league & it's totally fair to make a comparison between the two eras.
4. HACK laughed at you.
5. YOU defended against your original statement & said the 60's "obviously" wasn't as competitive. ADMITTING that CLEARLY the
6. YOU are here right now trying to fight both points. One to me that the 60's WAS competitive enough to make a clear cut comparison between a guy who could be LeBron James's grandfather. Then you're making the point to Hack, "obviously the 60's wasn't as competitive" & you're trying to hide behind your COMPLETE contradiction by saying, "All I'm saying is that stats don't show anything"...yeah, not between today & 40 years ago. But today against today it's where it's at. Kobe just has inferior stats, so you have nothing to say but "it's about rings". WELL, if it's about rings & you're telling me we can compare LeBron & Oscars stats, obviously we can compare Kobe & Russell's rings.

Just wave the white flag when you're ready.

[Sccit]

we're both acknowledging that the 60's was a much weaker time to play than now. People dominated the game then like they simply cannot today. So Oscar's stats, like Wilt's aren't real.

show me where i acknowledged this, biebs? LOL...still makin up random nonsense, as usual.

1. YOU SAID, "Oscar's numbers are better, therefore he's better than LeBron."

again, show me where i said this...all i said was that Oscar's NUMBERS were better, because u were going based off of numbers.

"obviously the 60's wasn't as competitive"

once again...show me where i said this. more lies.

Kobe just has inferior stats, so you have nothing to say but "it's about rings". WELL, if it's about rings & you're telling me we can compare LeBron & Oscars stats, obviously we can compare Kobe & Russell's rings.

like i always say, and u choose to ignore, a measure of greatness is not only rings. if that were the case, robert horry and steve kerr would be all time goats. it's not only numbers. if that were the case, wilt would be by far the greatest. it's a COMBINATION OF RINGS AND NUMBERS. why cant u make a comment on that instead of commenting on a bunch of lies u pretend like i said? really, though...this is my last reply 2 u in this topic, unless u have a strong argument to make against what i'm actually saying.

[Hack Wilson - real]

NIK hates the lies lol

[Sccit]

NIK hates the lies lol

funny thing is, he aint trollin...he's just really that dumb of a child

[rayallen0]

ok new list if we are basing it purely on performance during 00-10 as i was doing it career wise before.


1. Kobe
2. Tracy McGrady
3. Allen Iverson
4. Dwyane Wade
5. Ray Allen
6. Manu Ginóbili
7. Brandon Roy
8. Michael Redd
9. Eddie Jones
10. Vince Carter (best years were at SF)

[Chamillitary Click]

You can't talk to morons like that, it's absurd. He's trolling now.