It's June 04, 2024, 09:46:46 PM
I read about half of that. I'll comment on what I did read.1. I didn't say those guys were know for their shot. I said if they were alone & had players around them who could shoot, they'd be okay. Because those guys knew when they had to operate & when they could set up somebody to be in an ideal spot to score.2. Why did you name all those teams & "friends" of the star? It doesn't matter. Kobe Bryant, "best player of all-time, better than MJ" should do a little better than .500. You named some mediocre ass teams who "the greatest scorer of all-time" should be able to beat those teams. And don't give me some "well, teams knew who was going to shoot" because LeBron was alone against the Spurs in the Finals & you consider that a "choke"...somehow lol.3. I don't remember anyone at all saying how the Cavs were deep. But that's kind of a stupid argument because he was more than deep enough against the Mavericks & they didn't win. NIK has turned this on LeBron James, but I'm not really speaking on LeBron at all in this thread outside about responding to NIK who couldn't handle me downplaying Kobe...I've been talking about Kobe. You all just spin it to a LeBron argument because you Laker fans get so damn angry when I downplay Kobe. I know LeBron didn't play up to par in the Finals. This isn't really about him though outside that he hands down deserves the MVP this year. Other than that, it's really a conversation about Kobe you niggas just can't accept.4. LOL, this nigga wants to sit here & say "Well, these guys said Kobe didn't have a good team & those guys said LeBron's Cav deep was the deepest team in the league & Kobe said Kwamye Brown sucks". Well EVERYBODY & their mother in the media talks about how Kobe doesn't get Bynum or Pau involved at all, takes them out of rhythm, but you're going to sit here & tell me you see something professional analysts aren't seeing. "People saying things" about LeBron are spot on 100% of the time, right? But then Kobe gets brought up & those guys are fucking morons, right? lol. Skip Bayless, who you probably quote daily on your Twitter updates when he says LeBron has no clutch gene & should be on the bench the last five minutes of games is spot on there, but dead wrong & just flat out blind when he says Kobe fails to get them involved for the team to see it's full potential lol.I mean, you're going to say that with a straight face, that Kobe has to "bail them out", when he's 0-15 shooting & Bynum hasn't even attempted his 4th shot of the game yet lol. It's beyond insanity the defense responses that come out of Laker fans mouths.
I mean, honestly, I'm like 5'9'', white with an above average jump shot. If I was in the NBA & the coach was like "Just go do what Kobe does" & took 30+ shots a game, i'd score 10 points.
Bryant isn't a leader now ? Ehh, that's low even for you Chamilionare.
I'm the man in the booth, with a few good menQuote from: Chamillitary Click on April 22, 2012, 07:58:50 PMYou can't handle the truth. #slaughterhouse
You can't handle the truth.
I mean, like I'm trying to explain, it's pointless discussing Kobe to Laker fans. Yeah, he's a "leader", he "leads" by taking 65% of his teams shots. Then Meho's dumbass says Chris Paul is a "true leader", but somehow lumps a true point guard who can score & above all, like a leader should do, sets his teammates up. In Meho's savy NBA mind that's the same as Kobe leading the NBA in shots per game despite having the best front court in basketball. Because you know...that makes logical sense. Kobe is only a leader in the respect that when he's on, he can dominate a game like Melo, Bron, Durant, etc. It's the equivalent of calling Melo a leader because he'll have his games like today where he won the game...but for the rest of the team...stood & watched inferior players try to create for themselves. And NIK once again saying nothing of any relevance other than taking personal shots. I give you props for trying to use a stat. But not an idiotic one like "Well, when Kobe ISN'T on the floor & the other team isn't double teaming him when they get a chance & they can focus all their attention on Bynum & Bynum has to take more shots to cover Kobe's NBA leading 23 a game, Bynum shoots a lower percentage". C'mon, child.With that said, amazing game by him today. & NIK, I watched the game, which is your favorite line to say against anyone who notices a flaw. The man hit shots, I can't take that away from that animal, but when the play wasn't designed around him he stood there & watched. Thunder stand no chance with Westbrook's retarded ass running the point so wrecklessly. 3-22...absolute joke.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on April 22, 2012, 04:38:18 PMI mean, like I'm trying to explain, it's pointless discussing Kobe to Laker fans. Yeah, he's a "leader", he "leads" by taking 65% of his teams shots. Then Meho's dumbass says Chris Paul is a "true leader", but somehow lumps a true point guard who can score & above all, like a leader should do, sets his teammates up. In Meho's savy NBA mind that's the same as Kobe leading the NBA in shots per game despite having the best front court in basketball. Because you know...that makes logical sense. Kobe is only a leader in the respect that when he's on, he can dominate a game like Melo, Bron, Durant, etc. It's the equivalent of calling Melo a leader because he'll have his games like today where he won the game...but for the rest of the team...stood & watched inferior players try to create for themselves. And NIK once again saying nothing of any relevance other than taking personal shots. I give you props for trying to use a stat. But not an idiotic one like "Well, when Kobe ISN'T on the floor & the other team isn't double teaming him when they get a chance & they can focus all their attention on Bynum & Bynum has to take more shots to cover Kobe's NBA leading 23 a game, Bynum shoots a lower percentage". C'mon, child.With that said, amazing game by him today. & NIK, I watched the game, which is your favorite line to say against anyone who notices a flaw. The man hit shots, I can't take that away from that animal, but when the play wasn't designed around him he stood there & watched. Thunder stand no chance with Westbrook's retarded ass running the point so wrecklessly. 3-22...absolute joke.i was a never a fan of westbrook, hes a terrible point guard, but u can make the same argument for AI but AI was just phenomenal, which gave him a pass.if westbrook actually played point instead of chucking it up every opportunity he gets they might of won the game. lol there was a couple times in the game where i said "thank god for westbrook"he needs to stop thinking hes a number one option, when his athleticism starts to dwindle, hes gonna be garbage. his jumpshot is mediocre also, he doesnt have a natural stroke.and wait, you dont believe there a such thing of being "clutch"?
wouldn't it be dope if artest got ran over by a bus?