Author Topic: Battle for Armagedon  (Read 671 times)

Aladin

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Karma: 10
Battle for Armagedon
« on: April 22, 2014, 04:42:44 AM »
Dear Brothers and Sisters,

I give my humble opinion:

The recent event of Crimea now makes it certain that the Malhama(Armagedon in arabic) will occur. However NATO is likely to approach that great war cautiously rather than suddenly. Hence it would be difficult to say anything more precise than - maybe a few more years!

Remember that before WW2 Nazi Germany held the 1936 Summer Olympics with Hitler himself as Host.
A few years later..... tens of millions innocent people died and whole cities lay in Ruins.
When you look at the people in that stadium during the Olympics, they have black and white footage of it.
I can not stop to think myself how could all this people be Oblivious of the fact that they are at a moment in History were they will witness great suffering.

Now with all the weaponery at our disposal (Mankind in 2014, Nucl./Biological/Chemical).. WW1 and WW2 will look like a schoolfight.....

You do what you think is right (Prepare yourself for the worst or be like those people during 1936 Summer Olympics). I believe that it would be selfish to not share my  thoughts with you....



Edit: I edited to make sure that the reader understands my points without question.

Bonus:
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/PRkeahelZHM" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/PRkeahelZHM</a>
« Last Edit: April 22, 2014, 05:24:32 PM by Aladin »
 

J. B A N A N A S

Re: Battle for Armagedon
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2014, 04:40:42 PM »
I agree with you in regards to being oblivious before it happens.

How will whats happening in Crimea come in to play for us as Americans in the grand scheme of ww3? I'd like to hear your opinion.
 

Aladin

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Karma: 10
Re: Battle for Armagedon
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2014, 12:20:32 PM »
I agree with you in regards to being oblivious before it happens.

How will whats happening in Crimea come in to play for us as Americans in the grand scheme of ww3? I'd like to hear your opinion.

Let me give you a man who is far more learned then I am. Far more scholarly.
it is only 15 minutes long.. but the info about the history and current events is so important to be able to understand what is happening.
After that 15 minutes... I want you to tell me if you think US will still not be involved in the coming wars.

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/MPZPUom3d_M" target="_blank" class="new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/MPZPUom3d_M</a>

The chess pieces are being put in place.... in the end G-D knows best.
 

Aladin

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Karma: 10
Re: Battle for Armagedon
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2014, 01:44:32 AM »
@ Bananas I would love to hear your opinion on that video.
 

Aladin

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
  • Karma: 10
Re: Battle for Armagedon
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2014, 12:31:01 AM »






 
Trans-Atlantic global leadership at stake in Ukraine – John Kerry



NATO must return to its original goal of fending off Russia
, seizing the chance presented by the Ukrainian crisis to sever Europe from Moscow and move it closer to America, the US secretary of state said. Or else the bloc’s global leadership may be lost.

John Kerry delivered the confrontational call in a speech to the Atlantic Council think tank in Washington, DC. He said the stand-off in Ukraine presents a “uniquely personally-driven set of choices” and is “a wake-up call” for NATO. He added that now the military bloc must turn the page on two decades of focusing on expeditionary operations and take a stand against “Putin’s Russia.”

“After two decades of focusing primarily on our expeditionary missions, the crisis in Ukraine now call us back to the work that this alliance was originally created to perform,” Kerry told the audience.

NATO’s original purpose was to oppose the Communist Soviet Union, giving the West the military backbone to the ideologically-driven stand-off with the East. Kerry described it as “to defend alliance territory and advance trans-Atlantic security.”

“Today, Putin’s Russia is playing by a different set of rules,” the secretary stated. “Through its occupation of Crimea and its subsequent destabilization of eastern Ukraine, Russia seeks to change the security landscape of Eastern and Central Europe.”

“Together we have to push back against those who try to change sovereign border by force. Together we have to support those who simply want to live as we do,” he added.

Federalization supporters gather outside the regional government headquarters in Luhansk, eastern Ukraine, April 29, 2014. (Reuters/Vasily Fedosenko)

Federalization supporters gather outside the regional government headquarters in Luhansk, eastern Ukraine, April 29, 2014. (Reuters/Vasily Fedosenko)

Kerry didn’t mention NATO’s own operations against Yugoslavia, which helped change sovereign borders in Europe. But he said NATO must not allow the situation continue to develop as it is, because Russia is challenging the position NATO members held since the end of the Cold War.

“Our entire model of global leadership is at stake. If we stand together, if we draw strength from the example of the past and refuse to be complacent in the present, then I am confident that NATO, the planet’s strongest alliance, can meet the challenges, can absolutely take advantage of the opportunities that are presented by crisis,” he stressed.

Kerry suggested three points on how trans-Atlantic partners can preserve their leadership and contain Russia. He said all NATO members must comply with alliance’s benchmark of 2 percent GDP defense spending, which is not observed by many European members of the alliance, including European economic powerhouse Germany.

“Clearly, not all allies are going to meet the NATO benchmark of 2 percent of GDP overnight or even next year,” Kerry said. “But it’s time for allies, who are below that level to make credible commitments to increase their spending on defense over the next five years.”

NATO members must also help Europe reduce its dependence on Russian energy and develop economic ties with America by speeding down the pipeline the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement, Kerry said.

The agreement would certainly give more access to European markets to some US corporations, as it would require freeing up European regulations on things like fracking, GMOs, copyright and finance.

Lithuanian soldiers and US soldiers stand in front of an aircraft of the US air force at the air force base near Siauliai Zuokniai, Lithuania, on April 26, 2014. (AFP Photo)

Lithuanian soldiers and US soldiers stand in front of an aircraft of the US air force at the air force base near Siauliai Zuokniai, Lithuania, on April 26, 2014. (AFP Photo)

Kerry’s policy remarks are in line with those made recently by some other members of the US political establishment. For example Senator John McCain, one of the most vocal critics of Russia, went on the same lines of presenting Russia’s stance on Ukraine a personal choice by President Vladimir Putin and calling for more defense spending in Europe in his speech at Vilnius University, Lithuania, on Wednesday last week.

“Considering what President Putin is doing right now in Ukraine, it is more important than ever for every NATO ally to spend at least 2 percent of its GDP on defense,” McCain said. “I'm pleased that Lithuania has pledged and is planning to do this, and the sooner you follow through on that commitment the better.”

The US and Russia have been trading accusations of meddling with Ukrainian crisis lately. Washington says Moscow is sowing dissent in eastern Ukraine, fanning up anti-government protests there. Russia says the US sponsored the February coup in Kiev, which brought into power the current Ukrainian central authorities and has been playing a dominant role in defining the policies of the new government.






http://rt.com/news/155780-kerry-nato-russia-challente/