is old man D Wade starting over Isaiah Thomas the biggest injustice in NBA hist?

[Hack Wilson - real]

vote please kthx

[Sccit]

biggest injustice in nba history was nash gettin back-to-back mvps in the midst of kobe's prime

[Hack Wilson - real]

biggest injustice in nba history was nash gettin back-to-back mvps in the midst of kobe's prime

1-we been OVER this...nash's first MVP was during Kobe and the LAkers going 34-48  - nobody is calling Kobe an MVP on a non playoff team

2-Nash improved that second year AND beat Kobe in the playoffs...he earned that shit

[Sccit]

biggest injustice in nba history was nash gettin back-to-back mvps in the midst of kobe's prime

1-we been OVER this...nash's first MVP was during Kobe and the LAkers going 34-48  - nobody is calling Kobe an MVP on a non playoff team

2-Nash improved that second year AND beat Kobe in the playoffs...he earned that shit

It don't matter how u try to slice it, Kobe was the most valuable player in the league, Nash simply had a better team

[Mietek23]

There was always an unwritten rule in a MVP race saying, that your team had to have atleast around 50 wins for you to be considered a legitimate candidate for the award - Kobe was the best 1-on-1 player in the NBA and most skilled one durning that period of time, but his team wasen't that quite good.

Similar to Jordan's 37.1 ppg season - he was tearing the scoring records down, but Bulls were only 42-40 that season, that's why he didn't get the award that year. Same with Kobe - individual accomplishments didn't help the team reach greater level, that's why Nash got the award.

[Sccit]

There was always an unwritten rule in a MVP race saying, that your team had to have atleast around 50 wins for you to be considered a legitimate candidate for the award - Kobe was the best 1-on-1 player in the NBA and most skilled one durning that period of time, but his team wasen't that quite good.

Similar to Jordan's 37.1 ppg season - he was tearing the scoring records down, but Bulls were only 42-40 that season, that's why he didn't get the award that year. Same with Kobe - individual accomplishments didn't help the team reach greater level, that's why Nash got the award.

Actually his individual accomplishment definitely helped that team
reach a greater level. That team consisted of Luke Walton Smush Parker and Kwame Brown featured in starting roles... D league level team that was able to be competitive in the west and even took Nash's much better roster to 7 games. What Kobe accomplished that season was incredible and he was the MVP by definition. Unfortunately, post rape trial, kobes brand was never able to take off the way Jordans brand did .. And we all know the MVP award is nothing more than a popularity contest.. So that's that


An even bigger injustice tho was the Chris Paul to lakers deal being vetoed due to "basketball reasons" (illegal bullshit)... The fucked Kobes exit out the NBA and did us extremely dirty from 2012 to now....Kobe perhaps woulda got to 7, surpassing Jordan, and cementing his legacy as GOAT. If it was for MJ, stern woulda let that deal through.

[Hack Wilson - real]

biggest injustice in nba history was nash gettin back-to-back mvps in the midst of kobe's prime

1-we been OVER this...nash's first MVP was during Kobe and the LAkers going 34-48  - nobody is calling Kobe an MVP on a non playoff team

2-Nash improved that second year AND beat Kobe in the playoffs...he earned that shit

It don't matter how u try to slice it, Kobe was the most valuable player in the league, Nash simply had a better team

Not in 04 05...Kobe got 0 votes bro

[Sccit]

biggest injustice in nba history was nash gettin back-to-back mvps in the midst of kobe's prime

1-we been OVER this...nash's first MVP was during Kobe and the LAkers going 34-48  - nobody is calling Kobe an MVP on a non playoff team

2-Nash improved that second year AND beat Kobe in the playoffs...he earned that shit

It don't matter how u try to slice it, Kobe was the most valuable player in the league, Nash simply had a better team

Not in 04 05...Kobe got 0 votes bro

Because he was injured for a good portion of the season .. But beyond that, he was the best player in the league from 05 to 13

[Hack Wilson - real]

So therefore nash's mvp was legit

[Sccit]

In 06, not a chance in hell

[Hack Wilson - real]

06 is up got debate but Nash did improve from his previous season

[DJ SUGAFREE QUIK]

There was always an unwritten rule in a MVP race saying, that your team had to have atleast around 50 wins for you to be considered a legitimate candidate for the award - Kobe was the best 1-on-1 player in the NBA and most skilled one durning that period of time, but his team wasen't that quite good.

Similar to Jordan's 37.1 ppg season - he was tearing the scoring records down, but Bulls were only 42-40 that season, that's why he didn't get the award that year. Same with Kobe - individual accomplishments didn't help the team reach greater level, that's why Nash got the award.

An even bigger injustice tho was the Chris Paul to lakers deal being vetoed due to "basketball reasons" (illegal bullshit)... The fucked Kobes exit out the NBA and did us extremely dirty from 2012 to now....Kobe perhaps woulda got to 7, surpassing Jordan, and cementing his legacy as GOAT. If it was for MJ, stern woulda let that deal through.

I might sound biased on this even though i'm more Team Blake than Team CP3.  When it comes to trading a superstar player, here's what you want in return.  Draft picks, young talent, & expiring contracts.  Not the ripoff garbage the lakers were offering.  Finally other teams have seen the light & stopped helping them out.  Besides....none of the potential buyers of the N.O. team were gonna take the lakers crap offer.  CP3 still coulda joined the lakers in free agency if he wanted to.  But he wanted a challenge.  I still felt the clippers gave up too much to get CP3. 
So enough of the stern hates the lakers garbage.  Stern mainly hates the celtics, pacers, & a few other small market teams.  His dream matchup would be the lakers vs. the lakers. 

[Sccit]

There was always an unwritten rule in a MVP race saying, that your team had to have atleast around 50 wins for you to be considered a legitimate candidate for the award - Kobe was the best 1-on-1 player in the NBA and most skilled one durning that period of time, but his team wasen't that quite good.

Similar to Jordan's 37.1 ppg season - he was tearing the scoring records down, but Bulls were only 42-40 that season, that's why he didn't get the award that year. Same with Kobe - individual accomplishments didn't help the team reach greater level, that's why Nash got the award.

An even bigger injustice tho was the Chris Paul to lakers deal being vetoed due to "basketball reasons" (illegal bullshit)... The fucked Kobes exit out the NBA and did us extremely dirty from 2012 to now....Kobe perhaps woulda got to 7, surpassing Jordan, and cementing his legacy as GOAT. If it was for MJ, stern woulda let that deal through.

I might sound biased on this even though i'm more Team Blake than Team CP3.  When it comes to trading a superstar player, here's what you want in return.  Draft picks, young talent, & expiring contracts.  Not the ripoff garbage the lakers were offering.  Finally other teams have seen the light & stopped helping them out.  Besides....none of the potential buyers of the N.O. team were gonna take the lakers crap offer.  CP3 still coulda joined the lakers in free agency if he wanted to.  But he wanted a challenge.  I still felt the clippers gave up too much to get CP3. 
So enough of the stern hates the lakers garbage.  Stern mainly hates the celtics, pacers, & a few other small market teams.  His dream matchup would be the lakers vs. the lakers. 

you're fuckin kidding me, right?


the lakers deal was pau gasol to the rockets- cp3 to the lakers- goran dragic, kevin martin, lamar odom, luis scola, and a 1st round pick from the knicks to the hornets.....instead, the hornets got eric gordon, chris kaman, al-farouq aminu, and a 1st round pick from the t-wolves, while also having to send 2 second round picks to the clippers along with cp3.......


the lakers deal was WAYYYYYYYYYYY better, and it's not even close. odom was coming off winning 6th man of the year, scola and kevin martin were still all-star caliber players in their primes, and goran dragic is better than anyone the clippers offered x1000. not to mention pau gasol, who was the centerpiece of the trade, is playing the best ball of his career as we speak. and if u say the hornets wanted draft picks, young talent, etc., then they fucked up on that end too, because in the clippers deal, they had to send 2 picks to the clippers on top of cp3. cmon, now.


the vetoing of that trade was a joke and possibly even an internal conspiracy, and you crazy for claimin anythin otherwise. robbed kobe of at least 2 more rings and the laker franchise of our impeccable record.


http://www.businessinsider.com/chris-paul-trade-2014-11