Author Topic: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo  (Read 543 times)

Sub-Z

  • Guest
Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #15 on: July 22, 2002, 12:59:57 PM »
Smash Bro's? -yes ,hated it

Eternal Darkenss?not yet but im gettin it with my gamecube this christmas (wasnt made by nintendo anyways,was developed by silicon knights)

Mario Party? -yes there 3 of em,all absically the same

Pikmin? -lmao

Pokemon? (I havent, but I hear it's fun  ) -lmfao

Luigi's mansion? -yes boring as hell

Pilot-wings? not sure

Punch out? -that was back in the 80's man,anything was innovative then
 

Woodrow

Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2002, 01:05:58 PM »
Quote
Smash Bro's? -yes ,hated it

Eternal Darkenss?not yet but im gettin it with my gamecube this christman

Mario Party? -yes there 3 of em,all absically the same

Pikmin? -lmao

Pokemon? (I havent, but I hear it's fun  ) -lmfao

Luigi's mansion? -yes boring as hell

Pilot-wings? not sure

Punch out? -that was back in the 80's man,anything was innovative then



You havent played half the games on the list, and nintendo pretty much invented and perfected party games with mario party.

Smash bro's got rave reviews,
Pikmin and pokemon did as well

Tell me some of the games you think sega has been innovative with.

Im not saying they dont have innovative games. They do. They have some great games like crazy taxi and super monkey ball, but nintendo is the most innovative compnay out there

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Sub-Z

  • Guest
Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2002, 01:17:05 PM »
you dont understand innovative,comin out with shit people arent used to or havent seen,nintendo has come out wit tons of the same mario shit

sega has jet set radio future,gunvalkyrie,shenmue,phantasy star online,crazy taxi,seaman,samaba de amigo (no idea if thats the correct name,but its close enough) ill make another list later
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Woodrow

Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2002, 08:53:27 PM »
There is no dobut that sega makes some good games, but nintendo was the INVENTOR of half the shit on the market....

Samba de amigo is no fun w/o the shakey things, and that's hardware, so that can't be on the list...

Semen (hahahha) Is based around the virtual pet idea, and you also have to have the microphone to play, so that's hardware as well...

Phantsay star online is really nothing new. Ultima Online, Everquest, Asharons call, and many other online rpgs came before it.

I dont know about gunvalkrie so I cant comment on it,

Jet set radio is very cool and a great concept.

Shenmue was a great game... but had a shitty ending.

Crazy taxi certianly isnt innovative, yet fun at the same time. All they did was add a twist to and some edgy characters to a timed driving game.


Sega is an innovative company, but if you've been playing video games for as long as I have, you would realize that Nintendo is the OG shit of the video games. They invented the platform game.... Sega makes good games,but by no means are they the most innovative of the 2 companies.


In rap terms:

Dr dre = Nintendo

Snoop = Sega
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Sikotic™

Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2002, 09:08:23 PM »
Sega is more innovative
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
My Chihuahuas Are Eternal

THA SAUCE HOUSE
 

Sub-Z

  • Guest
Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #20 on: July 24, 2002, 09:09:38 PM »
lol you dont even know what innovative means,it ssure as hell isnt makin the same shit over and over
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Woodrow

Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #21 on: July 24, 2002, 10:01:00 PM »
Sure thing...

to me, innovative means being advanced,  forward-looking, and modern....

You still havent proved to me why Sega is more innovative...

You've given me a list of games, 2 of which require extra hardware to be properly enjoyed, 2 of which are NOT innovative, and 2 others that are good.

Just a question, how old are you, and how long have you been playing video games?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Sub-Z

  • Guest
Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #22 on: July 25, 2002, 05:25:50 PM »
nintendo was innovative in the fuckin 80's not now,same shit over and over,but whatever you dont understand
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

Woodrow

Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #23 on: July 25, 2002, 10:13:37 PM »
How don't I understand?

I provided facts...

There is no denying the games.

Perhpas if you would take the time to craft an argument with evidence and thoughtfullness then I would agree with you...

So far, you haven't shown me why Sega is more Innovative than Nintendo.

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
 

V Gotti: H.N.I.C.

  • 'G'
  • **
  • Posts: 138
  • Karma: 0
  • They Say a Party Ain't a Party Till The West At It
Re: More innovative:Sega vs. Nintendo
« Reply #24 on: July 26, 2002, 11:45:34 AM »
Quote
although i prefer nintendo games, i gotta go with sega, they like to expand their variety of games while nintendo always stick with the same formula for the most part mostly i like sports games made by sega.

-murderer



exactly, as much as i loved nintendo and made fun of my sister for her sega when i was a kid, now, nintendo is still following the same formula as they were 10 years ago when i was 8 and sega is definately exploring the possibilities
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 04:00:00 PM by 1034398800 »
All I really know your ho wants to be with me and she ain't playin!
 

I don't give a fuck 'cause I'm just drinkin, smokin, straight West Coastin