Author Topic: YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT THE 2001/02 LAKERS HERE! (Read 304 times)

Juice · « **on:** June 16, 2002, 11:42:56 AM »

Kobe BRYANT. Simply the next MJ. Vote: 9.5

Derek FISHER. Let's say the truth! I love him, he plays with passion and intelligence, but his defence was been questionable against Bibby. And .194 from 3pts (and .288 from 2pts) against Sac aint impressive too. Vote: 7 (cause he played great Finals making the last shots of Game 7 against Sac)

Rick FOX. Maybe it's time to try George as a starter. Fox doesnt have that touch of the ball no more, no more 3s like he used to do. But still great intelligence and defence. So vote: 6.5

Robert HORRY. We already know him. 5th title, and not as a comparsion. He won the games leading defence. Impressive. Plus he made THE SHOT. Vote: 9

Shaq O'NEAL. Ok, MJ is the best ever. But Shaq is the most dominant ever. Best center ever. 3 consecutive MVP in the Finals, best scoring average ever. Do i have to add more? Vote: 10+

Others:
DEVEAN GEORGE: Wow! He's getting bigger! He's ready! 7
LINDSEY HUNTER: Mmmmmm.. cant lead an attack. 5.5
MARK MADSEN: He pratically never played. But he's ghetto! LOL!
JELANY McCOY: Missed
STANI MEDVEDENKO: The man got the i dont give a fuck mentality! 6
MITCH RICHMOND: Ok, let's go for another one...
BRIAN SHAW: He's still the only real PG we got. I mean.. the mind!!! 7
SAMAKI WALKER: Not impressive, not bad. He's not ready yet for the Play Offs. 6.5

Jay ay Beee · « **Reply #1 on:** June 16, 2002, 11:45:55 AM »

Derek Fisher looks like a goof

That's my comments on the Lakers

ROCCY · « **Reply #2 on:** June 16, 2002, 11:47:41 AM »

Id prolly have to agree with ur votes..Except the 6.5 on Samaki Walker..wtf? that guys a total idiot..he didnt make one single shot in the finals..and u gave rick fox a 6.5? the same as u gave samaki that is bad lol...rick fox is way better then samaki...even tho fox doesnt get the ball like he used to before..pz

lbc213 · « **Reply #3 on:** June 16, 2002, 11:47:44 AM »

they still suck & sacramento is still 10 times better, too bad they didn't had as much luck as the lakers.

Anyway next year it will be the wizards , MJ 4 his 7th

peeeez

one luv

-lbc213-

Juice · « **Reply #4 on:** June 16, 2002, 11:51:38 AM »

Quote

Id prolly have to agree with ur votes..Except the 6.5 on Samaki Walker..wtf? that guys a total idiot..he didnt make one single shot in the finals..and u gave rick fox a 6.5? the same as u gave samaki that is bad lol...rick fox is way better then samaki...even tho fox doesnt get the ball like he used to before..pz

For sure FOX is better than Samaki Walker. But, i judged them by knowing what they can really give to Lakers. FOX can play hella better, so a 6.5 is like a negative vote for him. I didnt judge the players in general (the ratings), but i judged the actual season.

Walker played pretty good, considering he aint the best PF of the league. He's still 25 btw, and obviously we didnt buy him to defend on Webber or Duncan. He did his job, so 6.5 for him. He didnt start in the Play Offs? Of course! Horry was the REAL starter of Lakers. He didnt have to score or play a lot for us, and entering just for 20 secs during a decisive game aint always easy, so.. still 6.5 cause he did pretty well in the regular season. I will def judge him next year. If he'll stay.