Author Topic: Young Buck  (Read 576 times)

Jome

Re:Young Buck
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2003, 08:31:52 PM »
Fabolous' mixtapes have been better than Banks' too. So, if Buck is better than Fab, then Buck is better than Banks and 50.

Slow down, youngin'..
Nobody said Buck was better than Fabolous..
 

SGV

  • Guest
Re:Young Buck
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2003, 08:48:18 PM »
LMAO @ youngin. Been bumpin' Fab? LOL.

I made a mistake, thought you said Buck's performance put Fab to shame. Considering Banks was worse than 50 on the LP. LOL.
 

Jome

Re:Young Buck
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2003, 08:59:58 PM »
LMAO @ youngin. Been bumpin' Fab? LOL.

Gotta adjust to the discussion..  :P


Considering Banks was worse than 50 on the LP. LOL.




 

Code Blue

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • Karma: -22
Re:Young Buck
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2003, 03:43:54 AM »
In no way, shape, or form was 50 better on "Beg For Mercy" than Banks. 50's garbage.
 

white Boy

  • The totally random poster
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 9006
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • Karma: -119
  • http://bigbowlofsoup.tumblr.com/
Re:Young Buck
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2003, 11:23:09 AM »
I said that Buck outshined the other 2 the day I heard "Beg For Mercy". And IMO, Buck's solo album would be much better than Banks' solo album.
i dont agree, i cant see buck carying an album all by himself, meaning its just be a ok party album with MANY guest appearances, now banks, i dont want him to have 50 or buck on any tracks, i want him to have a real ass album with no guest apearances, and sick dre beats
 

SGV

  • Guest
Re:Young Buck
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2003, 03:22:53 PM »
Banks hasn't proven that he could anything other than generic thug rhymes. He's not a complete artist. He's boring. Matter of fact, he's a slower(mentally) version than Fabolous without the ability to make a hit record.