Michael Moore is Going To Be on Bill O'Reilly's Show Tommorow (Tuesday)!!!!!

[eS El Duque]

can anybody record it with a digi cam and put it online? I dont have Fox lol

I am not suprised. Fox News is the biggest cable news channel here in the US...theyir ratings dwarf those of CNN and MSNBC combined. But alot of left wing socialist countries like Canada and probably your country won't let Fox News air there because they don't want people exposed to new, different viewpoints besides the leftist brainwashing you guys usually get.

we get fox  ...but no fox news (i think on sundays we do)...instead we get the local news from that state we're closest too...Q-13 fox is mine

satillite gets you it

[BuddenzNasir]

Mach u bieng a 14 yr old with politics is kinda impressive i guess, no not really cuz any street smart person would kno his politics at an early age but, your arguments are jus ridiculous, u sound like ur Bill O'rielly trying to win an argument or something. just give it up open your eyes, learn a few things. no one became safer with Sudaam gone if thats true, we still would'nt be losing an average of 3 american soldiers everyday. its all coming back to haunt USA and CIA for putting him in power anyways.

[Machiavelli]

no one became safer with Sudaam gone if thats true, we still would'nt be losing an average of 3 american soldiers everyday. its all coming back to haunt USA and CIA for putting him in power anyways.

 Last time i checked 1 soldier a day is killed in Iraq. Last time I checked the  USA and CIA never put Saddam in power in the first place.

So we switched
our "main" reason for going there. So why didn't we hold any grudges before he nationalized the oil fields? In case you're wondering, he's always been a ruthless leader, so please answer that Sherlock (Yes, I'm being sarcastic, since you're probably too dumb to figure even that out)

Could you re-phrase that question please?

[Sikotic™]

This whole interview as well as this thread is useless.  Nobody's learning anything or changing minds.  Moore believes one way, people support him, and O'Reilly believes another way, and people support him.  There's no use in arguing about it, nobody's looking to learn, all they're looking to do is defend their position.  Fuck that, it's a waste of time. 

In this situation, definitely

[Maradona]

no one became safer with Sudaam gone if thats true, we still would'nt be losing an average of 3 american soldiers everyday. its all coming back to haunt USA and CIA for putting him in power anyways.

 Last time i checked 1 soldier a day is killed in Iraq. Last time I checked the  USA and CIA never put Saddam in power in the first place.

So we switched
our "main" reason for going there. So why didn't we hold any grudges before he nationalized the oil fields? In case you're wondering, he's always been a ruthless leader, so please answer that Sherlock (Yes, I'm being sarcastic, since you're probably too dumb to figure even that out)

Could you re-phrase that question please?

First of all, when was the last time you checked who put Saddam in power? Do you not know that the CIA helped Saddam gain the power to become leader of Iraq, the U.S. WANTED Saddam to become leader of Iraq because the previous leader chose to nationalize the oil fields, which angered the U.S.

And NO, I can't rephrase that question. If what I say goes way over your head, just say so.

[Machiavelli]

First of all, when was the last time you checked who put Saddam in power?

Yesterday

Do you not know that the CIA helped Saddam gain the power to become leader of Iraq, the U.S. WANTED Saddam to become leader of Iraq because the previous leader chose to nationalize the oil fields, which angered the U.S.

You got proof?

And NO, I can't rephrase that question. If what I say goes way over your head, just say so.

OK, then don't rephrase the question.

[Maradona]

First of all, when was the last time you checked who put Saddam in power?

Yesterday

Do you not know that the CIA helped Saddam gain the power to become leader of Iraq, the U.S. WANTED Saddam to become leader of Iraq because the previous leader chose to nationalize the oil fields, which angered the U.S.

You got proof?

And NO, I can't rephrase that question. If what I say goes way over your head, just say so.

OK, then don't rephrase the question.

1. I shouldn't have asked you when you checked because knowing you, I highly doubt that you would even be able to comprehend something this complex... in your standards of course.

2. Yes, once again I can show you.
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030410-070214-6557r

If you have any trouble reading or understanding that, let me know and I'll be glad to help.

3. What's the point of rephrasing if you won't even be able to answer it?!

[Trauma-san]

Again I have to wonder why yall are arguing.  You're wasting your breath, you'd be better off talking to people who actually don't know what's going on, or haven't already made their mind up about this stuff. 

[Maradona]

you'd be better off talking to people who actually don't know what's going on

That's exactly what I'm doing. 

[Machiavelli]

2. Yes, once again I can show you.
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030410-070214-6557r

If you have any trouble reading or understanding that, let me know and I'll be glad to help.

Thats not fact. Thats conpiracy shit. Fuck that, im not even gunna waste my time

[Maradona]

2. Yes, once again I can show you.
http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030410-070214-6557r

If you have any trouble reading or understanding that, let me know and I'll be glad to help.

Thats not fact. Thats conpiracy shit. Fuck that, im not even gunna waste my time

Nice argument.

LOL, RETARD, YOU SHOULD'VE LEARNED A LONG TIME AGO NOT TO TRY TO STEP UP TO SOMEONE WHO'S OBVIOUSLY WAY OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE WHEN IT COMES TO THIS SHIT. STEP DOWN AND LEARN YOUR PLACE.

[Machiavelli]

Nice argument.

LOL, RETARD, YOU SHOULD'VE LEARNED A LONG TIME AGO NOT TO TRY TO STEP UP TO SOMEONE WHO'S OBVIOUSLY WAY OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE WHEN IT COMES TO THIS SHIT. STEP DOWN AND LEARN YOUR PLACE.

I'm only 14 you know so take it lightly, i haven't even finshed high school, do you expect me to know all this shit. For someone my age, people consider me knowledgeable about foreign affairs and politics.


 Saddam got into power because President al-Bakr gradually withdrew from politics during the 1970s and formally retired in 1979. Hussein( who was vice-chairman) became chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council and president of the country. 

[Maradona]

Nice argument.

LOL, RETARD, YOU SHOULD'VE LEARNED A LONG TIME AGO NOT TO TRY TO STEP UP TO SOMEONE WHO'S OBVIOUSLY WAY OUT OF YOUR LEAGUE WHEN IT COMES TO THIS SHIT. STEP DOWN AND LEARN YOUR PLACE.

I'm only 14 you know so take it lightly, i haven't even finshed high school, do you expect me to know all this shit. For someone my age, people consider me knowledgeable about foreign affairs and politics.


 Saddam got into power because President al-Bakr gradually withdrew from politics during the 1970s and formally retired in 1979. Hussein( who was vice-chairman) became chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council and president of the country. 

LOLLLL.... So you admit that you don't know shit, and then you come back with another statement trying to argue. So you don't believe CIA officials when they say that they helped Saddam because the U.S. was trying to prevent Communist influence in Iraq? In case you didn't know, the same thing happened in Afghanistan... we supported the country against the Russians, it's a known fact. Why do you try to argue against facts?

[Machiavelli]

[quote author=Maradona link=topic=55895.msg626505#msg626505 date=1091076806

LOLLLL.... So you admit that you don't know shit, and then you come back with another statement trying to argue. So you don't believe CIA officials when they say that they helped Saddam because the U.S. was trying to prevent Communist influence in Iraq? In case you didn't know, the same thing happened in Afghanistan... we supported the country against the Russians, it's a known fact. Why do you try to argue against facts?

I didn't admit i don't know shit. Some stuff i haven't learned yet. Some stuff I'm learning, like what your telling me now.

OK, so the CIA helped Saddam to prevent a Communist Influence -- But that doesn't mean the US helped Saddam become a evil dictator and shit. Same thing wit the Afghans.

[Maradona]

[quote author=Maradona link=topic=55895.msg626505#msg626505 date=1091076806

LOLLLL.... So you admit that you don't know shit, and then you come back with another statement trying to argue. So you don't believe CIA officials when they say that they helped Saddam because the U.S. was trying to prevent Communist influence in Iraq? In case you didn't know, the same thing happened in Afghanistan... we supported the country against the Russians, it's a known fact. Why do you try to argue against facts?

I didn't admit i don't know shit. Some stuff i haven't learned yet. Some stuff I'm learning, like what your telling me now.

OK, so the CIA helped Saddam to prevent a Communist Influence -- But that doesn't mean the US helped Saddam become a evil dictator and shit. Same thing wit the Afghans.

LMFAO. I never said they helped him become EVIL. They brought him to power. He started killing people. The U.S. didn't care because he was helping us meet other goals. When he nationalized the Iraqi oil fields, then the U.S. cared and labeled him an evil dictator even though he was evil before the nationalization of the oil fields. The rest is history... (Iran/Iraq war, Gulf War, the present...)