Author Topic: US Dollar Continues to Weaken  (Read 225 times)

Ant

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2140
  • Karma: -418
US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« on: November 08, 2004, 06:22:19 AM »
The dollar today hit a new low against the euro, with analysts expecting the American currency to drop through the psychologically important $1.30 level.
As concerns grew about the enormous US current account deficit - the difference between America's import and export of goods and services - the dollar fell as low as $1.29 to the euro in morning trading.

The weakening dollar against the euro is bound to fuel concern about the eurozone's recovery, which has been dependent on exports to the US. The euro is up about 5% against the dollar from just a month ago.

"The US has a current account deficit, a budget deficit and a president who appears unconcerned about dollar weakness," said Shahab Jalinoos, a senior currency strategist at ABN Amro. "No one can see any reason to buy the dollar at the moment."

The latest weakening of the greenback began last Wednesday amid scepticism that George Bush, who has won another four years in the White House, will do much to tame the towering US deficits.

The US budget deficit is about $427bn, or 3.7% of gross domestic product, while its current account - the broadest measure of trade - widened to a record $166.1bn in the second quarter.

The dollar weakened today despite Friday's upbeat US jobs report, evidence of how seriously the markets view the imbalances in the US economy.

"The market's moves since Friday confirm that the market is focusing on structural problems rather than cyclical improvements in the US economy," said Kikuko Takeda, market analyst at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi in Tokyo.

 Top central bankers meeting in Basel, Switzerland, said yesterday they were keeping a wary eye on currencies, but Japanese and eurozone policymakers were not expected to step into the market to stop the dollar's fall for the time being.

The dollar is showing weakness against a wide range of currencies - down to a 12-year low against the Canadian dollar and at its lowest levels for several months against the pound and the Japanese yen.

Some respite for the dollar could come this week, when the US Federal Reserve is expected to raise interest rates by 25 basis points. If the US central bank indicates it will raise rates again in December, that could boost the dollar, as higher rates could attract more foreign capital to the US.





http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1346234,00.html?gusrc=rss
 

7even

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11283
  • Karma: -679
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2004, 06:27:40 AM »
time to realize that a deficit isnt just a number but like real load of fucking cash. that is gone now. and still ignored.

and you re-elected the moron and still feel like the "winners". laughable. more to come.
Cause I don't care where I belong no more
What we share or not I will ignore
And I won't waste my time fitting in
Cause I don't think contrast is a sin
No, it's not a sin
 

Ant

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2140
  • Karma: -418
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2004, 01:24:55 PM »
Another take on this story, from bloomberg. 

I agree 7even.  Eventually people will hopefully realize that we are all on the same team, and this whole crusade against Bush wasn't just because emotional liberals can't stand seeing a republican in the whitehouse.  People are so strongly opposed to Bush, because his policies are bad for the country. 

Nov. 8 (Bloomberg) -- The dollar may fall to its lowest ever against the euro for a second consecutive week after President George W. Bush signaled he will expand policies that produced record deficits and a 21 percent decline in the currency since he took office in 2001, according to a Bloomberg News survey.


Sixty percent of the traders, strategists and investors questioned on Nov. 5 from Tokyo to New York advised selling the dollar against the euro. Participants also said the U.S. currency will likely drop versus the yen, British pound, Swiss franc and Australian dollar.


``A second-term for Bush doesn't bode well for the dollar,'' said Samarjit Shankar, director of global foreign-exchange strategy at Mellon Financial Corp. in Boston, which manages $625 billion. ``There's no way of convincing the market additional spending on the war can be paid for if you have a lower tax base. It's a fundamental mismatch between spending and revenue.''


Bush, who won a second term on Nov. 2, presided over a record fiscal and current-account deficit at a time when appetite for U.S. securities among foreign investors is diminished. The president, who campaigned on making permanent his $1.85 trillion in tax cuts and prosecuting the war in Iraq, said he will spend political capital ``earned'' during the campaign.


``So many people just want to hammer the dollar,'' said Ashley Davies, a currency strategist in Singapore at UBS AG, the largest trader in the foreign-exchange market. ``An endorsement of the last four years means more of the same. The underlying trend for the dollar is down.''


`Benign Neglect'


The U.S. currency fell 1.3 percent last week against the euro to 1.2961 at 5 p.m. on Nov. 5. It fell as low as $1.2972, an all- time low. Compared with the yen, the dollar shed 0.3 percent. The dollar has fallen for four consecutive weeks against the euro and six versus the yen.


Measured by the Fed's Trade-Weighted Major Currency Dollar Index, the dollar has shed 21 percent since Bush took office in January 2001. The decline is the most since Ronald Reagan's second term, when the dollar lost 35 percent.


In a second term, the Bush administration will let the dollar weaken, keeping its policy of ``benign neglect'' of the currency, said Ryan Faulkner, a currency strategist in London at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Officials may be temped to spur a prolonged decline in an effort to boost exports and narrow the current account, he said.


``If there is a policy shift it would be in terms of them talking about the dollar more frequently,'' said Faulkner, a former Federal Reserve employee. ``Look for any type of commentary, especially from Treasury, about the level of the current account and whether it is sustainable.''


`Sell More Stuff'


Lehman, the most accurate forecaster of exchange rates in a third quarter Bloomberg survey of 50 companies, predicts the dollar will drop to $1.32 in 12 months and 99 yen. The current account is a measure of trade, services, tourism and investments.


The shortfall in the current account widened to a record $166.2 billion in the second quarter. The gap is equivalent to 5.7 percent of gross domestic product, up from 5.1 percent in the first quarter, meaning the U.S. economy needs to attract about $1.8 billion a day to maintain the value of the dollar, based on Bloomberg calculations. Third quarter figures are scheduled to be published next month.


A weaker dollar ``certainly would make U.S. goods more competitive and help with the trade deficit,'' said Susan Phillips, dean of the business school at George Washington University and a former Fed Governor. ``It will help businesses sell more stuff, make more money and pay more taxes, which will help narrow the budget deficit.''


Trade Deficit


The trade deficit, the amount by which the country's imports exceed its exports, probably held at $54 billion in September, according to the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg in advance of a government report on Nov. 10. The gap was a record $55 billion in June.


``We do not comment on day-to-day market fluctuations,'' said U.S. Treasury spokesman Rob Nichols. ``That said, there is no change to our dollar policy.'' Treasury Secretary John Snow said on Oct. 27 the U.S. favors a ``strong dollar, but we feel a currency's value ought to be set in open, competitive markets.''


The dollar fell to a record low against the euro on Nov. 5 even after a surge in U.S. employment fueled expectations the Fed will raise its benchmark interest rate two more times this year to 2.25 percent from the current 1.75 percent. The currency initially rallied after the Labor Department said employers added 337,000 workers in October, almost twice as many as forecast.


`Bulls Hoping'


The jobs report ``does give the Fed enough ammunition to go twice before the end of the year,'' said Mellon's Shankar, and ``keeps the dollar bulls hoping the economy is chugging along.''


``You are going to have a tussle between the current pace of economic activity and the growing deficits,'' he said.


Futures traders increased their bets to a record that the euro will gain against the dollar, figures from the Washington- based Commodity Futures Trading Commission on Friday show.


The difference in the number of wagers by hedge funds and other large speculators on an advance in the euro compared with those on a drop -- so-called net longs -- was 53,465 on Nov. 2, compared with 45,531 a week earlier. The net long position was the biggest since Bloomberg began keeping records in 1999.


After the employment report, ``the dollar's gain just offered better opportunities to get in and sell,'' said David Mann, a currency strategist in London at Standard Chartered Plc. ``We're likely to see new highs in the euro.''


`Green Light'


European policy makers are encouraging the dollar's slide by indicating they are not opposed to the euro's appreciation, said Chris Melendez, president of currency hedge fund Tempest Asset Management in Newport Beach, California.


German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said on Nov. 5 the euro's climb is ``not yet dramatic.'' His remarks followed European Central Bank President Jean Claude Trichet's failure a day earlier to protest the euro's four-week euro advance. Schroeder spoke at a press conference after a summit of European Union leaders in Brussels.


European officials have ``given the green light to buy euros,'' said Melendez. ``It is the ECB who sets policy and it is clear that they and the finance ministers are happy with a strong euro.''


The U.S. budget deficit swelled to $412.6 billion in the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, as war in Iraq and security costs contributed to the third straight annual shortfall under Bush. Those deficits, which require the Treasury to issue more debt, reversed four consecutive surpluses from 1998 to 2001. The White House predicts a $331 billion deficit in fiscal 2005.


Bush is pledging to make his tax cuts permanent as global investors reduce the pace at which they accumulate U.S. assets. International added to their holdings of U.S. assets in August at the slowest pace since October 2003, the Treasury Department said on Oct. 18. The net increase in holdings of Treasury notes was about a quarter of march's $60.8 billion, which was the highest level so far this year.


``I don't get the impression Bush will implement anything to reduce the budget deficit,'' said Lawrie Dryden, head of currency and asset allocation in Sydney at State Street Global Advisors, which manages about $29 billion. ``There is nothing to make us want to be long dollars.''

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=a6qeFkuWGzl0&refer=home
 

Machiavelli

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3695
  • Karma: 134
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2004, 01:46:25 PM »
Its Bushs fault.
 

Don Seer

Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2004, 02:09:49 PM »
its also weakened against the pound.. w00t :)




personally this is good for me.. because it means when my company gets paid by work we do the US.. due anyday.. it will translate to profits.. which will in turn translate to how big my xmas bonus is.. as they're linked.. ;)

however.. i wish the interest rate here would fuck up for a bit so house prices slam.. just while i'm saving of course  :D
« Last Edit: November 08, 2004, 02:11:23 PM by Overseer »
 

Don Rizzle

  • Capo Di Tutti Capi
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 4485
  • Karma: -4
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2004, 02:16:47 PM »
i wish the pound would drop its always stayed stong and has ruined whats left of our manufacturing industry

iraq would just get annexed by iran


That would be a great solution.  If Iran and the majority of Iraqi's are pleased with it, then why shouldn't they do it?
 

Don Seer

Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2004, 02:24:41 PM »
I just wanna be able to buy a house dammit..

 

*Jamal*

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1215
  • Karma: -34
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2004, 02:38:54 PM »
I just wanna be able to buy a house dammit..

Convert to Judaism... move to Israel... and I don't know how, but you're bound to come back rich...
 

Don Seer

Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2004, 03:19:04 PM »

or in a casket :P
 

Ant

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2140
  • Karma: -418
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2004, 03:20:47 PM »
Its Bushs fault.

While I assume your being sarcastic what you say actually is the truth.  Deficits force dollar devaluation.  People have been predicting this would happen for months.  Actually the dollar has slowly been losing value over the past four years.  If you remember, there was a time when the US Dollar was worth more than the Euro.  Now that obviously isn't the case, and unless something drastic happens this slow trend will only continue.  Eventually it will force inflation in the US economy. 

Explained more thoroughly, the value of money is influenced by supply and demand, just like everything else is.  When you run deficits you increase the supply of dollars, as the supply goes up, the price goes down, if demand stays constant.  Actually in this case though, Bush increased the supply of dollars by running deficits, and at the same time, demand for the dollar is dropping. Many of basic inputs into our economy, like raw materials, come from overseas.  As the cost for imports rises, the cost for all American goods will eventually rise or profits will fall. 

Many people voted for Bush just so they could proudly declare their side won, and they never thought to consider why so many people were fighting so hard to vote him out.  It wasn't because we hate republicans, it was because his policies are making this country worse, and will continue to do so.  Our economy is weakening, our money is worth less, we're one of the least respected countries in the world now, our military is being stretched thin, and we really aren't doing a great job fighting terrorism.  How much are you willing to sacrifice just to say "the side I voted for won?"

 

davida.b.

Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2004, 04:41:34 PM »
Oh Trauma, where are you?

M Dogg™

  • Greatest of All Time
  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 12116
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Karma: 330
  • Feel the Power of the Darkside
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2004, 05:30:36 PM »
Oh Trauma, where are you?

learning how to spit real sick after he gets off of Bush's dick
 

davida.b.

Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2004, 05:40:03 PM »
Oh Trauma, where are you?

learning how to spit real sick after he gets off of Bush's dick

nah nah, you got it twisted. He's on Brian Wilson's dick, while he's sucking Bush's dick. There's a difference.

Jome

Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2004, 09:13:02 PM »
personally this is good for me.. because it means when my company gets paid by work we do the US.. due anyday.. it will translate to profits.. which will in turn translate to how big my xmas bonus is.. as they're linked.. ;)

It also means that buying music/DVD's/etc. from U.S. is as cheap as from a 3rd world country..  :D ;D
Especially with Norwegian Kroners being stronger than ever.  8)

I could move to U.S. and live like a millionaire..  :D
 

tommyilromano

  • Guest
Re: US Dollar Continues to Weaken
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2004, 02:34:17 AM »
http://www.chicagofed.org/consumer_information/strong_dollar_weak_dollar.cfm


Quote
Strong Dollar, Weak Dollar:
Foreign Exchange Rates and the U.S. Economy

How does the dollar's value in other countries help or hinder the U.S. economy?

How can the value of the dollar be both good and bad for Americans at the same time?

What causes the dollar's value in other countries to change?

Where is the international currency market and how does it operate?

Strong is good. Weak is bad. These generalizations sound simple enough, but they can be confusing when talking about money. Is a "strong" U.S. dollar always good? Is a "weak" dollar always bad? This publication explores how the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies affect each other and how their interaction affects you and the economy.

Understanding Foreign Exchange

The terms strong and weak, rising and falling, strengthening and weakening are relative terms in the world of foreign exchange (sometimes referred to as "forex"). Rising and falling, strengthening and weakening all indicate a relative change in position from a previous level. When the dollar is "strengthening," its value is rising in relation to one or more other currencies. A strong dollar will buy more units of a foreign currency than previously. One result of a stronger dollar is that the prices of foreign goods and services drop for U.S. consumers. This may allow Americans to take the long-postponed vacation to another country, or buy a foreign car that used to be too expensive.

U.S. consumers benefit from a strong dollar, but U.S. exporters are hurt. A strong dollar means that it takes more of a foreign currency to buy U.S. dollars. U.S. goods and services become more expensive for foreign consumers who, as a result, tend to buy fewer U.S. products. Because it takes more of a foreign currency to purchase strong dollars, products priced in dollars are more expensive when sold overseas.

Strengthening Dollar
Advantages

* Consumer sees lower prices on foreign products/services.
* Lower prices on foreign products/services help keep inflation low.
* U.S. consumers benefit when they travel to foreign countries.
* U.S. investors can purchase foreign stocks/bonds at "lower" prices.

Disadvantages

* U.S. firms find it harder to compete in foreign markets.
* U.S. firms must compete with lower priced foreign goods.
* Foreign tourists find it more expensive to visit U.S.
* More difficult for foreign investors to provide capital to U.S. in times of heavy U.S. borrowing.

Weakening Dollar
Advantages

* U.S. firms find it easier to sell goods in foreign markets.
* U.S. firms find less competitive pressure to keep prices low.
* More foreign tourists can afford to visit the U.S.
* U.S. capital markets become more attractive to foreign investors.

Disadvantages

* Consumers face higher prices on foreign products/services.
* Higher prices on foreign products contribute to higher cost-of-living.
* U.S. consumers find traveling abroad more costly.
* Harder for U.S. firms and investors to expand into foreign markets.

A weak dollar also hurts some people and benefits others. When the value of the dollar falls or weakens in relation to another currency, prices of goods and services from that country rise for U.S. consumers. It takes more dollars to purchase the same amount of foreign currency to buy goods and services. That means U.S. consumers and U.S. companies that import products have reduced purchasing power.

At the same time, a weak dollar means prices for U.S. products fall in foreign markets, benefiting U.S. exporters and foreign consumers. With a weak dollar, it takes fewer units of foreign currency to buy the right amount of dollars to purchase U.S. goods. As a result, consumers in other countries can buy U.S. products with less money.

Ideally, the dollar and all nations' currencies should be valued at a level that is neither too high nor too low. Such a level would help sustain long-term economic growth and stability both here and abroad. However, this ideal is difficult to reach since many factors affect the value of a nation's money. Some of the factors are complex, but many are quite simple.

The Value of a Currency

The value of a currency can be viewed from a domestic as well as an international perspective. Domestically, we use measures such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to measure changes in the purchasing power of the dollar over time. When the CPI increases, we say that the dollar is buying less — the value or purchasing strength of the dollar is going down. If the CPI is relatively stable, we say that the value of the dollar is stable. For some products with falling prices, we can even say that the purchasing power of the dollar is increasing.

Even when the dollar may be stable domestically, the value of the dollar could rise or fall as measured by another country's currency. In those cases, a currency is a commodity. It is something that has a price and is bought and sold to be used. The medium of exchange used to purchase this commodity is the currency of another country. The dollar, in that perspective, is purchased by foreign citizens who will, in turn, use it to purchase U.S. goods and services or dollar-denominated assets such as Treasury securities, corporate or municipal bonds, or stock.

An interesting aspect of foreign exchange is that a currency may be strengthening but still may not be strong relative to its historical position. For example, if the dollar were to rise from 85 yen to the dollar to 88 yen, it is strengthening. However, because the dollar historically is worth more than 100 yen, it is still not "strong." Likewise, a dollar that falls to 175 yen from 185 yen is weakening, but certainly not weak by historical comparison.

Almost every international exchange of goods and services requires the exchange of one currency for another. Less frequently, some countries will barter goods, or settle payments in gold. But most international transactions involve foreign exchange. The individual, firm or government of another country that wants to buy U.S. products needs dollars. This is because the dollar is legal tender in this country and transactions tend to be denominated in dollars.

The dollar, of course, is not the only currency that is bought and sold, but it is among the most popular. Other important currencies include the euro, the Japanese yen and the German deutschmark (sometimes referred to as the d-mark).

The Forex Market

In most cases, the buying and selling of currencies takes place in the forex market. The currencies of most advanced and many developing economies are traded in this market. The forex market does not involve sending large loads of currency from one country to another. Typically it involves electronic balances. Dollar-denominated balances in computers in the U.S. or other countries are traded for computer-housed balances around the world that are denominated in yen, euros, d-marks, or any of dozens of other commonly traded monies. In short, when "currency" is traded, paper and metal are not the usual media of exchange. Foreign exchange exists mainly in the world of cyberspace.

Not all currencies are traded on forex markets. Currencies that are not traded are avoided for reasons ranging from political instability to economic uncertainty. Sometimes a country's currency is not exchanged for the simple reason that the country produces very few products of interest to other countries.

Unlike the commodities or stock markets, the forex market has no central trading floor where buyers and sellers meet. Most of the trades are completed by commercial banks and forex dealers in the U.S. and abroad using telephones and computers.

The forex market operates worldwide, 24 hours a day. Traders in Australia and the Far East begin trading in Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, and Sydney at about the time most workers in San Francisco are going home for supper the previous evening. As the business day in the Far East closes, trading in Middle Eastern financial centers has been going on for a couple of hours, and the trading day in Europe is just beginning. By the time the New York business day gets going in full force, it is almost time for early afternoon tea in London. Some of the large U.S. banks and brokerage houses have an early shift to minimize the time difference of 5 to 6 hours with Europe. To complete the circle, West Coast financial institutions extend "normal banking hours" so they can trade with New York or Europe on one side, and with Hong Kong, Singapore, or Tokyo on the other.

In each case, financial institutions, corporations, or even interested individuals buy and sell money. They use one currency to purchase another. In many cases, they are buying money as part of doing business in the country that issues that currency. But in other cases, firms or individuals may buy one currency in one market to sell it in another and profit from the difference in price. This speculating on price differences is called arbitrage. In an age of virtually instant communication, this is especially challenging because the differences in price may last only a few seconds.

The forex market is distinguished here from the forex futures market, which has several trading floors, principally the International Monetary Market, a division of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. The futures market in forex was developed to help reduce risk for international firms and financial institutions. The market was designed to "guarantee" exchange rates at a future date in order to facilitate international transactions. Prior to the development of forex futures, there could be a significant amount of risk in entering into a long-term contract with firms in other countries. One of the largest sources of risk was the inability to guarantee the relative value of the currencies involved at the date of delivery.

Two is better than one
It is often possible to see two different national currencies accepted in one country. In some foreign countries, the U.S. dollar is the "currency of choice" because individuals have misgivings about the soundness of the domestic currency. In other cases, accepting two currencies depends on location. For example, in areas near the Canadian border, U.S. currency is sometimes fully acceptable in Canadian shops and Canadian currency is used (often at the official exchange rate) in U.S. establishments. But generally speaking, these areas tend to be small and in close proximity to the borders. Usually the decision to accept a foreign currency is made by local establishments as a convenience to border-crossing tourists.

Price Determined by Supply and Demand

The forex market is essentially governed by the law of supply and demand and is generally not regulated by any government or coalition of governments. This is true in the U.S., where participation in the forex market is not regulated. The prices set for each country's money is determined by the desire of those trading to acquire more of it or to hold less of it. Each individual acts on the belief that he or she will benefit from the transaction.

According to the law of supply, as prices rise for a given item (in this case money), the quantity of the item that is supplied will increase; conversely, as the price falls, the quantity provided will fall. The law of demand states that as the price for an item rises, the quantity demanded will fall. As the price for an item falls, the quantity demanded will rise. It is the interaction of these basic forces that results in the movement of currency prices in the forex market.

For example, if French investors saw an opportunity in the U.S., they might be willing to pay more francs in order to get dollars to invest in the U.S. If the dollar moved from five francs per dollar to six francs per dollar, the dollar "strengthened against the franc." In other words, a dollar could buy more francs. We could also state the same movement in francs. In the example above, the franc would move from 20˘ per franc to approximately 16˘ per franc. The franc "weakened against the dollar" because a franc could buy fewer dollars.

How do changes in a currency's value affect a country's domestic economy? To show the effects, we can look at the U.S. economy during the 1990s. The dollar was quite strong in relation to other currencies during most of that period. Dollars were in high demand for a number of reasons. Among these was the desire of foreign citizens to buy U.S. financial securities such as Treasury notes and bonds, corporate bonds, and other U.S. assets. Part of the reason for this was the general attractiveness of U.S. government securities; another was because U.S. financial markets were booming through much of the period.

Factors Contributing to a Strong Currency

* Higher interest rates in home country than abroad
* Lower rates of inflation
* A domestic trade surplus relative to other countries
* A large, consistent government deficit crowding out domestic borrowing
* Political or military unrest in other countries
* A strong domestic financial market
* Strong domestic economy/weaker foreign economies
* No record of default on government debt
* Sound monetary policy aimed at price stability.

Factors Contributing to a Weak Currency

* Lower interest rates in home country than abroad
* Higher rates of inflation
* A domestic trade deficit relative to other countries
* A consistent government surplus
* Relative political/military stability in other countries
* A collapsing domestic financial market
* Weak domestic economy/stronger foreign economies
* Frequent or recent default on government debt
* Monetary policy that frequently changes objectives.

Many sectors of the U.S. economy were borrowing heavily during this period. Government, corporations, and individuals were relying on credit. This created strong demand for money to lend to borrowers. Typically, money saved by consumers is used to help meet such demand. Unfortunately, savings rates in the U.S. were low. Consequently, the money for U.S. borrowing had to come from somewhere. Funds from abroad helped to meet the demand. This rise in demand increased the price of dollars relative to other currencies. This, in turn, made it more attractive for investors to hold dollars.

At the same time, the Federal Reserve kept inflation under control. This made the dollar attractive because of its stability. These trends combined to raise the cost of the dollar for foreign investors. The relatively high rates of return in U.S. financial markets enabled investors to earn better profits than could be found in their own financial markets. The increased demand for U.S. investments helped to make the dollar stronger. In addition to attractive rates, foreigners were eager to invest in the United States because this country was, and still is, seen as a comparatively stable, safe haven where investments are secure.

Effects on an Economy

The decisions of citizens to invest in another country can have a significant effect on their domestic economy. In the case of the U.S., the desire of foreign investors to hold dollar-denominated assets helped finance the U.S. government's large budget deficit and supplied funds to private credit markets. According to the laws of supply and demand, an increased supply of funds — in this case funds provided by other countries — tends to lower the price of those funds. The price of funds is the interest rate. The increase in the supply of funds extended by foreign investors helped finance the budget deficit and helped keep interest rates below what they would have been without foreign capital.

The rising demand for dollar-denominated assets also had a negative effect on the U.S. economy. The stronger dollar increased the attractiveness of foreign goods in the U.S. Many price-conscious U.S. consumers responded by purchasing more imports and fewer domestic goods. This did help keep inflation under control. But at the same time, U.S. exports were more expensive to foreigners who tended to buy fewer U.S. goods. As a result, the trade deficit widened as U.S. exports decreased and U.S. imports increased.

When a currency becomes too strong or too weak, it tends to distort international competition. As we have seen, the strong dollar of the 1990s distorted the competitiveness of U.S. producers in relation to foreign producers. Even though foreign producers may not have used their resources as efficiently as their U.S. counterparts, they still might have been able to sell their products at lower prices than U.S. goods.

Many U.S. companies responded to this increased competition by streamlining their processes and increasing productivity. In the long run, increased productivity benefited these companies and the U.S. economy. However, some producers could not make sufficient adjustments and found that their products could not compete in either U.S. or international markets.

In reaction, many of those hurt by foreign imports called for government assistance to limit foreign competition. This assistance came in the form of tariffs, quotas, subsidies and embargoes. This sentiment of protectionism is potentially one of the most harmful outgrowths of changes in the relative strengths of currencies. If one government passes laws setting up protective barriers, other countries would likely retaliate with protective measures of their own. International trade would slow, and people in all nations would then lose the benefits of better quality, lower prices, and a broader selection of products.

A Different Lesson from the '90s

The reason a currency weakens may not have much to do with problems in that country's economy. Sometimes, a currency weakens simply because of external factors. While most of the 1990s saw a strong U.S. dollar, the U.S faced a different situation briefly during the middle of the decade.

During the autumn of 1995, the U.S. dollar began to weaken significantly against both the Japanese yen and the German d-mark. The U.S. economy was still recovering from the 1990-91 recession, although many were concerned about the weakness of the recovery. When the dollar began to fall, this increased investors' and consumers' concern about the strength of the recovery. There were even calls for the Treasury to direct the Federal Reserve to buy dollars and sell yen and d-marks in an attempt to strengthen the dollar.

However, the dollar was not falling because the U.S. economy was weak. Rather, the rising value of the other currencies reflected improving economic conditions within those countries. In Germany, the continued reunification of East and West, while presenting problems, was viewed as an opportunity to reach a large population that previously had not had access to Western goods and services. High interest rates in the reunified Germany were also an attraction to investors.

A different scenario was unfolding in Japan. Despite low interest rates, deflation was actually making "real" Japanese interest rates fairly attractive. Real interest rates are usually calculated by subtracting the rate of inflation from the interest rate quoted. Thus, a 4 percent interest rate in an economy with 3 percent inflation converts to a real rate of interest of only 1 percent (4 percent - 3 percent = 1 percent). Negative inflation (commonly called deflation) essentially adds that rate to the market interest rate. An interest rate of 2 percent in an economy with 3 percent deflation yields a real rate of interest of 5 percent.

Thus, the reason the dollar "weakened" during the fall of 1995 had less to do with weakness in the U.S. economy than with positive opportunities in the economies of Germany and Japan.

Stable Dollar

A strong currency can have both a positive and a negative impact on a nation's economy. The same holds true for a weak currency. Currencies that are too strong or too weak not only affect individual economies, but tend to distort international trade and economic and political decisions worldwide. This is compounded by the fact that individual consumers can benefit from changes in the value of a currency, while producers in the same country are hurt. But the value of a currency alone does not dictate trade flows. Many other factors are involved, such as the quality of the product. Nevertheless, changes in currency values can have a dramatic effect. Ideally, currency values should be relatively stable and at a level that can sustain long-term economic growth both here and abroad.

Bretton Woods and Fixed Rates
If shifts in exchange rates can cause problems, why not fix rates between countries? Under a fixed-rate system, a dollar would always be worth the same amount of pounds, lira, yen or d-marks. This idea is not new. Through most of the modern era the world was on a fixed-rate system. The most recent version is referred to as the Bretton Woods System.

In 1944, the industrialized countries of the world met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to discuss the state of the international economy in the post-WW II era. The heart of the discussion evolved around a plan to fix the rate of exchange for all foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar. The dollar would, in turn, be tied to gold for purposes of international settlement at a set price. This meant that a pound, lira, yen, etc., would always yield a fixed number of dollars. And an ounce of gold would always cost a set number of dollars.

The hope was that the U.S. dollar would provide stability for international trade. This stability would, in turn, translate to a solid base upon which the war-torn economies of Europe and Asia could rebuild. One disadvantage of this system was that participating nations would need to take actions that would affect their domestic economy — such as increasing or decreasing the money supply — in order to maintain their exchange rate.

The Bretton Woods Agreement, as it came to be called, started to unravel in the early 1960s. The U.S. had enjoyed a period of prosperity for most of the period since the end of World War II. Because the U.S. dollar was not convertible to gold domestically, but was considered "as good as gold" internationally, the growing U.S. economy (and money supply) meant that excess dollars easily found their way overseas.

But, in order to maintain the value of their currencies relative to the dollar, other countries had to expand their money supplies just as quickly in order to maintain the agreed upon ratios of foreign currencies to dollars. This increase in foreign currencies introduced higher inflation to those nations. The U.S. was, in essence, exporting inflation.

By the late 1960s, the now resurgent countries of Europe and Asia recognized one of the sources of their inflation problems. They were reluctant to increase their domestic money supply to keep pace with the U.S., so they began to return excess dollars, demanding gold in payment at the agreed-upon rate of exchange. This led to an outflow of gold from the U.S. Eventually the U.S. holdings of gold became dangerously low. By 1971, President Nixon was forced to close the "gold window" by no longer exchanging dollars for gold at the agreed-upon rate. Since that time, exchange rates have been allowed to "float," with rates determined by the supply of and demand for currencies.

Notes

Strong Dollar, Weak Dollar is one of a series of essays adapted from articles in On Reserve, a newsletter for economic educators published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. The original article was written by Keith Feiler and revised by Tim Schilling.