It's May 25, 2024, 07:08:15 AM
wait does it mean for the quiet people they find it difficult to communicate ? when infact they have bulk knowledge they just struggle sharing it ? two lines shouldnt be that puzzling...
It doesn't mean anything. It's just a fallacious way to appear deep. Lemme explain.
the answer is this...you're the wrong part in the equation infinite.. as usual you're trying to pick the "better" option.. but the answer itself depends upon context.you already put bias into your question. its plain to see you think the quiet person is more clever. you're saying the person who asks doesnt know and saying the person who doesnt ask knows lots.trauma pointed out the stupidity in it.perhaps you havent articulated what you wanted to find out properly. no one knows everything, no one can know everything. and no one is better than anyone.my answer is, this is an unanswerable question. sure one guy has more knowledge. but that has nothing to do with of true knowledge of self.if you think that the person who knows more knows themselevs better you could be really really wrong.unless you mean the only knowledge they are seeking is only of self.. in which case the quiet man is more at peace with self..your problem is you need to stop trying to make "this person better than that person" either by their skin colour, relgiion or whatever other methods you pick this week to try and work out your place in the world.
Quote from: rafsta on April 02, 2005, 06:29:04 PMwait does it mean for the quiet people they find it difficult to communicate ? when infact they have bulk knowledge they just struggle sharing it ? two lines shouldnt be that puzzling...It doesn't mean anything. It's just a fallacious way to appear deep. Lemme explain.The statement is about having 'inner knowledge' or whatever, but the guy saying it, whoever wrote it, whoever came up with this line, is cancelling himself out just by saying it. He's basically saying that the people who don't speak have the true knowledge, but here he is speaking. So what's that say about him? And if he doesn't have true knowledge, then why would we listen to him? You can do this with ANYTHING. Here, I'll make up some bullshit.He who laughs often hides pain... but yet he who is without laughter is most certainly with pain. HEY, I'M A GENIUS!Here, I'll do another one.The Sun rises in the east, and reflects upon all creation... but it is often easier to reflect upon one's own creation when the sun has retired to the west. OOOOH, I"m DEEP! I'm gonna go start a religion.Here's one last one, to show I can do three in 1 minute.Um....Man struggles to find what will make him complete, but man can only be complete when he no longer seeks to struggle.
Quote from: Trauma on April 07, 2005, 09:55:38 PMIt doesn't mean anything. It's just a fallacious way to appear deep. Lemme explain.What you get out of it depends on your level of consciousness. For you, maybe it was nothing and didn't mean anything. Come back and read it again in a few years and see if you have a different understanding. It's not a huge deal, if you don't get anything out of it, then you don't get anything out of it, no problem, it was just there, some people will benefit, some won't.
Again, your age and intelligence is showing. It's a simple, simple little 'parable' or whatever you want to call it, and I immediately 'got' what you 'got' out of it, but ultimately, the two sentences you posted don't mean anything, just like the three that I posted don't mean anything. It's just a clever way of writing about things that are fucking OBVIOUS to anybody with half a mind. Sometimes quiet people don't talk. No shit. Sometimes the people that talk don't have the answers. No shit. Tell me something I DON'T know.