It's April 28, 2024, 10:23:28 AM
Total Members Voted: 24
I still believe Phil Jackson was the biggest piece to the puzzle to the Lakers success
A big number people like to use with players that play with Shaq is FG% or eFG%This is Kobe's eFG% without Shaq. 48.2This is Wade's eFG% with Shaq. 48.3
Quote from: Javier on May 29, 2005, 09:55:27 AMA big number people like to use with players that play with Shaq is FG% or eFG%This is Kobe's eFG% without Shaq. 48.2This is Wade's eFG% with Shaq. 48.3where the fuck you get these numbers? eFG%???
Quote from: Rampant on May 28, 2005, 07:18:20 PMTo me kobe is all egois that what ESPN told you LOL..i hate when people say shit like that..Rodman was a crazy muthafucka and he still kick malones ass in the finals,but because he's a ego crazy muthatfucka u gonna say he's nit that good..that's stupid!!!
To me kobe is all ego
...Kobe is a "jealous muthafucka who destroyed the Lakers"I don't like Shaq much...but there was something definitely wrong in LA. The numbers show that Kobe's team couldn't do as well without Shaq. I don't understand why people praise Kobe so much. I understand you are Lakers fans but shit...have some common sense.
Why are you all insisting it's the same team without Shaq?It's two different teams.
Okay...the Heat were a different team this year as well. Last year, they made the playoffs. This year, they made the playoffs. The Lakers are a different team to. Yes, they did lose a lot of players from last year, however, they've had different players for the past ten years, but they've always made the playoffs. What happened to them this year?
Quote from: 7even the Annoyed One on May 28, 2005, 06:29:53 PMMaybe still Kobe, Wade might pretty damn sure be a lot better in a couple years, though. People overrate Kobe like motherfuckers. Those 3 rings dont prove SHIT. There are like 10-15 active guards who would have had 3 rings with SHAQ and PHIL in 6 years, during Shaq's prime. And that's the truth. Shaq was the reason why Lakers were what they were, not Kobe. Of course it wouldnt have been that great without Kobe, but a lot of players could have REPLACED Kobe. While no motherfuckin Center would have been able to replace Shaq. I know this forum is filled with Kobe dickriders, but deep down in your motherfucking heart you know Im so damn right that is makes you puke.
Maybe still Kobe, Wade might pretty damn sure be a lot better in a couple years, though. People overrate Kobe like motherfuckers. Those 3 rings dont prove SHIT. There are like 10-15 active guards who would have had 3 rings with SHAQ and PHIL in 6 years, during Shaq's prime. And that's the truth. Shaq was the reason why Lakers were what they were, not Kobe. Of course it wouldnt have been that great without Kobe, but a lot of players could have REPLACED Kobe. While no motherfuckin Center would have been able to replace Shaq. I know this forum is filled with Kobe dickriders, but deep down in your motherfucking heart you know Im so damn right that is makes you puke.
All you Laker/Kobe fans make me sick