It's April 27, 2024, 04:59:25 AM
fuck the celtics..they've been just a nother team sinse the ealy 90's....and you want to say the Lakers choked in the finals?...i like to look @ it having more chances to win a championship b/c through out history we been better then everyone else...the celtics did all there damage in the bill russel days and did a lil something in the 80's..but the Lakers won more in the 80's..& the Lakers have consistently always been great...we still have kobe,phil,a center that's working hard to be the next best center in the league..it's going to take a while but it's cool...the celtics don't have shit on their team these days...And the Lakers have miss the playoffs 2 times sinse 1978 ...Dr.Buss has done a great job..I think the celtics miss the playoffs most of the 90's ..and a couple times in the 2'gs....Lakers>>>celtics..deal with it
^^^ wow!..you made no sense ..now go killyourself
Quote from: "Speak On It"-Kurupt on September 17, 2005, 06:00:13 PM^^^ wow!..you made no sense ..now go killyourself dude, are you really that retarded?
THE CELTICS HAVE BEEN JUST A NOTHER TEAM SINSE THE EARLY 90'S...LAKERS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CONSISTENT...Bill Russel Era....celtics>>>Lakers>>>evryone elseLate 70's,80's,90's,2 g's Lakers>>>10 other teams>>celticsLakers had 9 more chances to win a championships then the Celtics...the celtics did all there damage in 1 era (bill Russel) Lakers HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CONSISTENTLakers>>>>>celtics....end of discission
Quote from: "Speak On It"-Kurupt on September 17, 2005, 06:33:28 PMTHE CELTICS HAVE BEEN JUST A NOTHER TEAM SINSE THE EARLY 90'S...LAKERS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CONSISTENT...Bill Russel Era....celtics>>>Lakers>>>evryone elseLate 70's,80's,90's,2 g's Lakers>>>10 other teams>>celticsLakers had 9 more chances to win a championships then the Celtics...the celtics did all there damage in 1 era (bill Russel) Lakers HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CONSISTENTLakers>>>>>celtics....end of discission 16-3 > 14-14Even IF the Celtics lost 9 more championships to get to same point as the Lakers, they'd STILL have less loses and more wins. Celtics > LakersNo matter when they did their damage in, they did it well enough to CEMENT them as the best Franchise, Dynasty whatever. Everyone but the Laker Girls here are posting facts, you guys are posting opinions. I don't like the Celtics, matter of fact, I hate them. But, FACTS don't lie.
SGV man, this must be the first time youve argued with this idioit? lol
Quote from: SGV on September 17, 2005, 06:44:22 PMQuote from: "Speak On It"-Kurupt on September 17, 2005, 06:33:28 PMTHE CELTICS HAVE BEEN JUST A NOTHER TEAM SINSE THE EARLY 90'S...LAKERS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CONSISTENT...Bill Russel Era....celtics>>>Lakers>>>evryone elseLate 70's,80's,90's,2 g's Lakers>>>10 other teams>>celticsLakers had 9 more chances to win a championships then the Celtics...the celtics did all there damage in 1 era (bill Russel) Lakers HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CONSISTENTLakers>>>>>celtics....end of discission 16-3 > 14-14Even IF the Celtics lost 9 more championships to get to same point as the Lakers, they'd STILL have less loses and more wins. Celtics > LakersNo matter when they did their damage in, they did it well enough to CEMENT them as the best Franchise, Dynasty whatever. Everyone but the Laker Girls here are posting facts, you guys are posting opinions. I don't like the Celtics, matter of fact, I hate them. But, FACTS don't lie.SGV man, this must be the first time youve argued with this idioit? lol