Author Topic: Celtics vs Lakers  (Read 859 times)

Stone Cold is Bout It, Bout It

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3639
  • Karma: 117
Celtics vs Lakers
« on: September 19, 2005, 03:14:46 AM »
REGULAR SEASON
Celtics 1946-2005

(w)2737-(L)1856-(.596)
_____________
Lakers 1948-2005

(w)2727-(L)1674-(.620)
___________________

HA! Lakers have a better winning %...Celtics have 10 more wins then us but they have 2 more season under their belt (celtics started in 1946...Lakers 1948)



« Last Edit: September 19, 2005, 03:36:30 AM by "Speak On It"-Kurupt »
 

acbaylove

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2005, 03:34:10 AM »
Why are you even wasting your time with those stats? Lakers are the best franchise in sports history. Period.
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2005, 09:53:43 AM »
Honestly, there's no need for this really...Laker haters will just say anything to add to their arguement. I think it's pretty obvious that the Lakers are by far the biggest and most succesful franchise in basketball history...PeACe
 

eS El Duque

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • Karma: 35
  • SuperTight
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2005, 10:40:40 AM »
Why are you even wasting your time with those stats? Lakers are the best franchise in sports history. Period.

I'm sorry, Yankees(MLB) are. THen after them its the Montreal Canadians (NHL). If we're talking about North American sports.
DUBCC FANTASY BASEBALL CHAMPION 2008


 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2005, 10:46:42 AM »
Montreal Canadians (NHL).


LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO.
 

$do11a biLL$

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2005, 10:53:18 AM »
The only reason why the Lakers have a better winning percentage is they havent been around and played as much as the Celtics have. Plus the Celtics have won 2 more championship titles than the Lakers and have the most playoff wins. Me being a Laker hater doesn't have anything to do with what im saying.The facts are the facts.  8)
 

eS El Duque

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • Karma: 35
  • SuperTight
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2005, 10:55:19 AM »
Montreal Canadians (NHL).


LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO.


24 championships...whats funny about that?

Oh, my Green Bay packers have 12 NFL Championships (three superbowls), the most in the NFL history (then comes the Bears with 9 and Giants with 6). Also the only NFL team to win three straight titles TWICE.


So Yankees, Lakers, Canadians, Packers, Celtics....those teams have a history of winning.
« Last Edit: September 19, 2005, 11:00:54 AM by 05/06 Favre »
DUBCC FANTASY BASEBALL CHAMPION 2008


 

Javier

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 8585
  • Karma: 284
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2005, 10:57:12 AM »
This is fucking stupid.  Seriously, two great franchises why even argue whos better just leave it at that.  Who has more titles, the Celtics.  Who has been more consistent in winning, the Lakers.  Who has contributed more to the game of basketball, DOES IT MATTER? No it doesnt. 
 

SGV

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2005, 11:06:11 AM »
I guess I really upset the Laker Girls here. LOL. Truth hurts...
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #9 on: September 19, 2005, 11:22:17 AM »
Montreal Canadians (NHL).


LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO.


24 championships...whats funny about that?


It's not funny, but claiming that the Canadians are a bigger franchise than the Lakers is fucking hilarious...
 

Mr. Nice Guy

  • Muthafuckin' OG
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
  • Karma: 7
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2005, 11:44:32 AM »
What's up with Latrell Sprewell? Is he still signing?
 

eS El Duque

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • Karma: 35
  • SuperTight
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2005, 11:53:41 AM »
Montreal Canadians (NHL).


LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO.


24 championships...whats funny about that?


It's not funny, but claiming that the Canadians are a bigger franchise than the Lakers is fucking hilarious...

There you go reading shit wrong lol. Antoino said that the lakers are the best franchise in sports history. If we're talking about successful franchises, then Yankees and the Canadians are way ahead. I never said the Canadians were "bigger". We all know americans don't enjoy hockey that much (even though there are 24 US hockey teams).
DUBCC FANTASY BASEBALL CHAMPION 2008


 

acbaylove

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2005, 02:27:01 PM »
Why are you even wasting your time with those stats? Lakers are the best franchise in sports history. Period.

I'm sorry, Yankees(MLB) are. THen after them its the Montreal Canadians (NHL). If we're talking about North American sports.

Maybe i used a wrong word. I mean Lakers are the most popular worldwide respected franchise in sports. Yankees and Canadians for sure are two teams with an history of wins, like the Lakers and the Celtics, but when it comes to popularity, 90% of the people outside America doesnt even know them, cause hockey and baseball are not popular here. Basket is. Everybody knows Jordan, i mean everybody in the world. Everybody knows Chicago Bulls. Everybody knows Boston Celtics. Everybody knows Los Angeles Lakers. But the Lakers, instead of the other two teams, are more consistant in winning. From the West era to the Magic era to the Shaq-Kobe era. When you say Lakers, you say wins. Plus look at the tv share, and everything. Lakers are the most loved/hated team in NBA history. That sums it all.
 

eS El Duque

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • Karma: 35
  • SuperTight
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2005, 03:31:54 PM »
Why are you even wasting your time with those stats? Lakers are the best franchise in sports history. Period.

I'm sorry, Yankees(MLB) are. THen after them its the Montreal Canadians (NHL). If we're talking about North American sports.

Maybe i used a wrong word. I mean Lakers are the most popular worldwide respected franchise in sports. Yankees and Canadians for sure are two teams with an history of wins, like the Lakers and the Celtics, but when it comes to popularity, 90% of the people outside America doesnt even know them, cause hockey and baseball are not popular here. Basket is. Everybody knows Jordan, i mean everybody in the world. Everybody knows Chicago Bulls. Everybody knows Boston Celtics. Everybody knows Los Angeles Lakers. But the Lakers, instead of the other two teams, are more consistant in winning. From the West era to the Magic era to the Shaq-Kobe era. When you say Lakers, you say wins. Plus look at the tv share, and everything. Lakers are the most loved/hated team in NBA history. That sums it all.


Yea I agree with some of your points. But sayin Lakers are the most popular worldwide respected franchise is a big statement. I ain't sayin thats right or wrong becuase I havn't done a survey of everyone in the world. But wow. I think a soccer team would have that title.
DUBCC FANTASY BASEBALL CHAMPION 2008


 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Celtics vs Lakers
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2005, 03:54:40 PM »
In general, the name Lakers just means more than the name Canadians or the name Celtics...