It's May 01, 2024, 11:14:03 AM
If the Lakers can void Vlad Rad's contract, I say do it. He's been a huge disapointment this season for the money he is making, is contract is too long, and that's messed up the way he lied to the Laker organization. Plus I think the Lakers will be under the cap in the offseason if they did this.
Quote from: TTTEEEDDD on February 25, 2007, 03:47:30 PMQuote from: LAKERS_FAN89 on February 25, 2007, 03:46:40 PM The Lakers head north to visit their in-state rival the Golden State Warriors. Los Angeles has won both of their previous meetings with the Warriors this season. You typically post such info BEFORE the game starts.i know i post it anyways u got a problem with it?
Quote from: LAKERS_FAN89 on February 25, 2007, 03:46:40 PM The Lakers head north to visit their in-state rival the Golden State Warriors. Los Angeles has won both of their previous meetings with the Warriors this season. You typically post such info BEFORE the game starts.
The Lakers head north to visit their in-state rival the Golden State Warriors. Los Angeles has won both of their previous meetings with the Warriors this season.
Quote from: TTTEEEDDD on February 24, 2007, 12:12:41 PMIf the Lakers can void Vlad Rad's contract, I say do it. He's been a huge disapointment this season for the money he is making, is contract is too long, and that's messed up the way he lied to the Laker organization. Plus I think the Lakers will be under the cap in the offseason if they did this.Not a good idea. Voiding Vlad's contract would make the Lakers look bad publicly and would make it harder to attract free agents. On top of that, the players union would be all over it. Now if Radman choked out Phil, that's a different story, as that would be a PR nightmare.The Lakers should fine him and then look for a trade in the off season if possible.
Quote from: Juronimo on February 26, 2007, 02:57:50 PMQuote from: TTTEEEDDD on February 24, 2007, 12:12:41 PMIf the Lakers can void Vlad Rad's contract, I say do it. He's been a huge disapointment this season for the money he is making, is contract is too long, and that's messed up the way he lied to the Laker organization. Plus I think the Lakers will be under the cap in the offseason if they did this.Not a good idea. Voiding Vlad's contract would make the Lakers look bad publicly and would make it harder to attract free agents. On top of that, the players union would be all over it. Now if Radman choked out Phil, that's a different story, as that would be a PR nightmare.The Lakers should fine him and then look for a trade in the off season if possible.This is the Lakers. They'll never have a problem attracting free agents. Vlad is a big dissapointment, even if injuries are to blame. This is an oppurtunity for the Lakers to dump a long contract and save cap money. A contract is there and it's in black and white. There's nothing the PU can do about it. Being under the cap is worth any bad PR the Lakers get (espically if KG comes to the Lakers).
BTW, Mich is definatly a good GM.-Taking a risk on drafting Bynum at number 10.-Drafting Farmar who was a steal in the draft and should have gone higher.-Taking in a troubled player in Kwame Brown (another huge risk) and him turning him into a force in the paint.-Resigning Kobe.-Drafting Walton in the second round of the draft (huge steal).-Picking up Smush and Turiaf from nowhere.He ain't as good as the great Jerry West, but he is a great successor.
Quote from: LAKERS_FAN89 on February 25, 2007, 03:54:45 PMQuote from: TTTEEEDDD on February 25, 2007, 03:47:30 PMQuote from: LAKERS_FAN89 on February 25, 2007, 03:46:40 PM The Lakers head north to visit their in-state rival the Golden State Warriors. Los Angeles has won both of their previous meetings with the Warriors this season. You typically post such info BEFORE the game starts.i know i post it anyways u got a problem with it?Yes, in a matter of fact I do.
Home
Help
Login
Register
Print
