Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment

The Official Professional Wrestling Thread (WWE, TNA, etc.)

<< < (1104/1420) > >>

Shallow:

--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on April 13, 2010, 01:26:30 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on April 10, 2010, 12:08:51 PM ---
--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on April 10, 2010, 08:52:21 AM ---Shallow youre a joker. Id never said the Bills would have 3 superbowls with Brady...Manning has 1 ring Brady has 3...Nuff said on that, give all the reasons you want, you cant change that fact. And just when i was starting to believe Manning was the greatest, he proved in the SB he wasnt even the best Qb in that game..But back to HBK, just admit people were eager to see that Match vs Taker and he was a draw if only for 1 night

--- End quote ---


Manning outplayed Brees. The problem was Payton completely out coached Caldwell. Manning was two plays from a completely perfect game against a hard man to man blitz. Brees platyed against a soft cover 2 that couldn't tackle for the final 3 quarters. I could have won for the Saints QBing that game. No blitzes, no pressure, wide open short passes. The worst QB in the NFL could have started and Saints still win. The two mistakes Manning made were going long to Collie when Clark was short and thinking Austin Collie was good enough to make a play, and two thinking Reggie Wayne is Hines Ward and letting him drive to the inside against a jumping DB and having faith in his WR.

But here's the kicker; what would have those two plays have lead to if played better by Manning? A FG and a punt. So instead of 31-17 with 3 minutes and Indy ball, it would have been 24-20 with 3 minutes and Saints ball. And let's say Indy does get the ball back. What do we get then? Another dropped TD pass by Wayne in the endzone?

The 09 Colts are the 09 Bills, except they have Peyton Manning.


Oh, and Shawn Michaels; still not a draw.

--- End quote ---

LOL!!! Stop suckin his dick man. Any person that watched the game even a little kid could tell that bress outplayed manning.. 32 of 37 2 tds 0 ints...Get peytons dick out of ur mouth shallow its disgusting

--- End quote ---


A little kid yes, because a little kid can't understand the difference in defenses. Brees was 3 for 7 against the man to man. Then they dropped back to a cover 2 and he was 28 or 29 for 30. He was completing basketball chest passes for 25 of them. It's not his fault, but no way if the QBs switched QBs would the result of the game be any different.

Just make me a solid argument; why would Brees have won with the Colts and Manning have lost with the Saints? I love Brees and I'm glad for him but the Colts philosophy is the only reason they aren't the only 19-0 team in league history. If Bill Cowher was there coach this year they would have been that team. Peyton isn't reason they didn't win. Peyton's the reason they even had a chance.

Stats mean nothing if you aren't paying attention to the game.

Brady is a better QB than Bradshaw and Bart Starr but the tale of Championships say otherwise, and they're wrong.

"THE" MoSav:

--- Quote from: Shallow on April 13, 2010, 02:17:27 PM ---
--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on April 13, 2010, 01:26:30 PM ---
--- Quote from: Shallow on April 10, 2010, 12:08:51 PM ---
--- Quote from: "THE" MoSav on April 10, 2010, 08:52:21 AM ---Shallow youre a joker. Id never said the Bills would have 3 superbowls with Brady...Manning has 1 ring Brady has 3...Nuff said on that, give all the reasons you want, you cant change that fact. And just when i was starting to believe Manning was the greatest, he proved in the SB he wasnt even the best Qb in that game..But back to HBK, just admit people were eager to see that Match vs Taker and he was a draw if only for 1 night

--- End quote ---


Manning outplayed Brees. The problem was Payton completely out coached Caldwell. Manning was two plays from a completely perfect game against a hard man to man blitz. Brees platyed against a soft cover 2 that couldn't tackle for the final 3 quarters. I could have won for the Saints QBing that game. No blitzes, no pressure, wide open short passes. The worst QB in the NFL could have started and Saints still win. The two mistakes Manning made were going long to Collie when Clark was short and thinking Austin Collie was good enough to make a play, and two thinking Reggie Wayne is Hines Ward and letting him drive to the inside against a jumping DB and having faith in his WR.

But here's the kicker; what would have those two plays have lead to if played better by Manning? A FG and a punt. So instead of 31-17 with 3 minutes and Indy ball, it would have been 24-20 with 3 minutes and Saints ball. And let's say Indy does get the ball back. What do we get then? Another dropped TD pass by Wayne in the endzone?

The 09 Colts are the 09 Bills, except they have Peyton Manning.


Oh, and Shawn Michaels; still not a draw.

--- End quote ---

LOL!!! Stop suckin his dick man. Any person that watched the game even a little kid could tell that bress outplayed manning.. 32 of 37 2 tds 0 ints...Get peytons dick out of ur mouth shallow its disgusting

--- End quote ---


A little kid yes, because a little kid can't understand the difference in defenses. Brees was 3 for 7 against the man to man. Then they dropped back to a cover 2 and he was 28 or 29 for 30. He was completing basketball chest passes for 25 of them. It's not his fault, but no way if the QBs switched QBs would the result of the game be any different.

Just make me a solid argument; why would Brees have won with the Colts and Manning have lost with the Saints? I love Brees and I'm glad for him but the Colts philosophy is the only reason they aren't the only 19-0 team in league history. If Bill Cowher was there coach this year they would have been that team. Peyton isn't reason they didn't win. Peyton's the reason they even had a chance.

Stats mean nothing if you aren't paying attention to the game.

Brady is a better QB than Bradshaw and Bart Starr but the tale of Championships say otherwise, and they're wrong.

--- End quote ---

Not Brees Fault that the Colts played soft, but they did and he got the job done, And Coaching has nothing to do with Peyton throwing an Int to Porter to cost the Colts the game, and i never said if Brees was the Colts Qb they would have won, but Brees outplayed Manning, NO MATTER the circumstances, trust me i watch all the little things in the game, but that doesnt change the fact that Drew got it done. I guess Montana wasnt great either cuz the west coast offense had him completing 5-10 yd passes consistently, take off your Manning Blinders and Open youre eyes man..I do think Manning is the best qb in the NFL hes proved that to me over the last few years, but he was far from fantastic in the SB, you cant deny that he got outplayed

"THE" MoSav:
thats the last thing ima say about Manning.This is a WWE Thread..Sorry to get off topic.

Is it just me or after WM does the WWE seem a little deflated, i was so excited before WM, now i dont have much to look FWD too.I already miss HBK :(

Sikoticâ„¢:
It's all a bunch of Wrestlemania rematches minus the new Swagger title reign so I think that's why it seems so lame at the moment.

To me, NXT is the best thing the WWE has going for them. I'm digging it lately. It's like a more interesting Tough Enough.

J.D. Wykid, Esq.:

--- Quote from: Sikotic on April 14, 2010, 02:21:35 PM ---It's all a bunch of Wrestlemania rematches minus the new Swagger title reign so I think that's why it seems so lame at the moment.

To me, NXT is the best thing the WWE has going for them. I'm digging it lately. It's like a more interesting Tough Enough.

--- End quote ---

according to the ratings, you might be the only one watching nxt.  :-\

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
Go to full version