It's June 16, 2024, 06:48:10 AM
i like the way wwe is going seems to be moving back towards an attitude like eraand mark my words orton will end up in a stable wirth priceless and shane o mac...the only other conclusion is there gunna try and make orton a face which would suck
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 30, 2008, 01:37:22 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 29, 2008, 06:41:09 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 29, 2008, 06:06:04 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 10:29:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 05:11:44 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 07:54:52 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 02:56:36 AMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.people better than UndertakersRic FlairHarely RaceLou TheszBret HartSteve AustinDusty RhodesKiller KowalskiVerne GagneShawn MichaelsDory Funk, Jr.Bruno SammartinoStingRandy Savagei disagreeHow you define GOAT... longevity... skill... entertainer... connection with fans... how they do as a heel/face... if it wasn't for Austin's neck injury... he'd have all of that locked up.Austin had way bigger pops than 'Taker ever had, he was a far superior wrestler on the mat, especially pre-neck injury. His matches with Bret Hart were classics, in WCW his wars with Pillman and Steamboat were mat clinics on how to put on a match. All at the same time, he was more connected to fans, he was selling injuries, selling wrestling holds, not rolling his eyes and then chocking his way out of everything. Austin could do either face or heel, and do it better than 'Taker. In every way shape and form, except longevity... Austin runs over 'Taker.I just prefer Taker, everything from style to gimmick to longevity. nothin 2 argue about.and I prefer watching a 'Taker match, but it's undeniable that Austin had a bigger impact than 'Taker and his gimmick was just flat out better than 'Taker's.nelly had a bigger impact on music than ras kass...doesnt mean hes better.If you argue that with Hulk Hogan, it might make sense, but Austin had way more wrestling skillz than 'Taker, so your point is not taken. Dude, look up Austin in WCW, the Ringmaster days in WWF, anything pre-broken neck, and his putting on clinics. And still getting bigger heat or pops than 'Takers.
Quote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 29, 2008, 06:41:09 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 29, 2008, 06:06:04 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 10:29:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 05:11:44 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 07:54:52 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 02:56:36 AMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.people better than UndertakersRic FlairHarely RaceLou TheszBret HartSteve AustinDusty RhodesKiller KowalskiVerne GagneShawn MichaelsDory Funk, Jr.Bruno SammartinoStingRandy Savagei disagreeHow you define GOAT... longevity... skill... entertainer... connection with fans... how they do as a heel/face... if it wasn't for Austin's neck injury... he'd have all of that locked up.Austin had way bigger pops than 'Taker ever had, he was a far superior wrestler on the mat, especially pre-neck injury. His matches with Bret Hart were classics, in WCW his wars with Pillman and Steamboat were mat clinics on how to put on a match. All at the same time, he was more connected to fans, he was selling injuries, selling wrestling holds, not rolling his eyes and then chocking his way out of everything. Austin could do either face or heel, and do it better than 'Taker. In every way shape and form, except longevity... Austin runs over 'Taker.I just prefer Taker, everything from style to gimmick to longevity. nothin 2 argue about.and I prefer watching a 'Taker match, but it's undeniable that Austin had a bigger impact than 'Taker and his gimmick was just flat out better than 'Taker's.nelly had a bigger impact on music than ras kass...doesnt mean hes better.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 29, 2008, 06:06:04 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 10:29:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 05:11:44 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 07:54:52 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 02:56:36 AMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.people better than UndertakersRic FlairHarely RaceLou TheszBret HartSteve AustinDusty RhodesKiller KowalskiVerne GagneShawn MichaelsDory Funk, Jr.Bruno SammartinoStingRandy Savagei disagreeHow you define GOAT... longevity... skill... entertainer... connection with fans... how they do as a heel/face... if it wasn't for Austin's neck injury... he'd have all of that locked up.Austin had way bigger pops than 'Taker ever had, he was a far superior wrestler on the mat, especially pre-neck injury. His matches with Bret Hart were classics, in WCW his wars with Pillman and Steamboat were mat clinics on how to put on a match. All at the same time, he was more connected to fans, he was selling injuries, selling wrestling holds, not rolling his eyes and then chocking his way out of everything. Austin could do either face or heel, and do it better than 'Taker. In every way shape and form, except longevity... Austin runs over 'Taker.I just prefer Taker, everything from style to gimmick to longevity. nothin 2 argue about.and I prefer watching a 'Taker match, but it's undeniable that Austin had a bigger impact than 'Taker and his gimmick was just flat out better than 'Taker's.
Quote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 10:29:25 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 05:11:44 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 07:54:52 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 02:56:36 AMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.people better than UndertakersRic FlairHarely RaceLou TheszBret HartSteve AustinDusty RhodesKiller KowalskiVerne GagneShawn MichaelsDory Funk, Jr.Bruno SammartinoStingRandy Savagei disagreeHow you define GOAT... longevity... skill... entertainer... connection with fans... how they do as a heel/face... if it wasn't for Austin's neck injury... he'd have all of that locked up.Austin had way bigger pops than 'Taker ever had, he was a far superior wrestler on the mat, especially pre-neck injury. His matches with Bret Hart were classics, in WCW his wars with Pillman and Steamboat were mat clinics on how to put on a match. All at the same time, he was more connected to fans, he was selling injuries, selling wrestling holds, not rolling his eyes and then chocking his way out of everything. Austin could do either face or heel, and do it better than 'Taker. In every way shape and form, except longevity... Austin runs over 'Taker.I just prefer Taker, everything from style to gimmick to longevity. nothin 2 argue about.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 05:11:44 PMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 07:54:52 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 02:56:36 AMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.people better than UndertakersRic FlairHarely RaceLou TheszBret HartSteve AustinDusty RhodesKiller KowalskiVerne GagneShawn MichaelsDory Funk, Jr.Bruno SammartinoStingRandy Savagei disagreeHow you define GOAT... longevity... skill... entertainer... connection with fans... how they do as a heel/face... if it wasn't for Austin's neck injury... he'd have all of that locked up.Austin had way bigger pops than 'Taker ever had, he was a far superior wrestler on the mat, especially pre-neck injury. His matches with Bret Hart were classics, in WCW his wars with Pillman and Steamboat were mat clinics on how to put on a match. All at the same time, he was more connected to fans, he was selling injuries, selling wrestling holds, not rolling his eyes and then chocking his way out of everything. Austin could do either face or heel, and do it better than 'Taker. In every way shape and form, except longevity... Austin runs over 'Taker.
Quote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 07:54:52 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 02:56:36 AMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.people better than UndertakersRic FlairHarely RaceLou TheszBret HartSteve AustinDusty RhodesKiller KowalskiVerne GagneShawn MichaelsDory Funk, Jr.Bruno SammartinoStingRandy Savagei disagree
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 26, 2008, 02:56:36 AMQuote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.people better than UndertakersRic FlairHarely RaceLou TheszBret HartSteve AustinDusty RhodesKiller KowalskiVerne GagneShawn MichaelsDory Funk, Jr.Bruno SammartinoStingRandy Savage
Quote from: M Dogg for Obama on September 26, 2008, 01:38:43 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.thats your opinion.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on September 25, 2008, 09:28:27 PM^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOATGOAT big man, maybe, his the only one that challenges Andre the Giant. GOAT, well his not even of his generation, I'd say Austin.
^damn...that really sucks. Undertaker=GOAT
Lance Cade got released:World Wrestling Entertainment has come to terms on the release of Raw Superstar Lance Cade as of October 14, 2008. WWE wishes Lance the best in all future endeavors.http://www.wwe.com/inside/news/cadereleaseso much for having a push. i bet he did something stupid and pissed off the wrong person lol.
Quote from: Mo Z. Dizzle on October 14, 2008, 05:21:37 PMLance Cade got released:World Wrestling Entertainment has come to terms on the release of Raw Superstar Lance Cade as of October 14, 2008. WWE wishes Lance the best in all future endeavors.http://www.wwe.com/inside/news/cadereleaseso much for having a push. i bet he did something stupid and pissed off the wrong person lol.Shawn Michaels couldn't even save him?