It's May 07, 2024, 09:02:25 PM
Total Members Voted: 3
Isn't there a danger that the UN could become too powerful though? as that is the real danger with european union a superstate which has robbed european countries of genuine sovereignty.
The U.N. is totally useless. The Red Cross gets more done for third world countries every year than the U.N. Does. That's sad.They told Saddam to "stop it!" "I'm going to count to three!" for 10 years while Saddam just basically punked their ass. Then, the U.S.A. punked their ass too by going against their will to invade Iraq. Nobody anywhere gives the U.N. any creedence or basically gives a fuck what they do. The U.N. doesn't have power over people on good terms with them (u.s.), and doesn't have power over people on bad terms with them (Iraq).... what the fuck good are they? They're a joke.
Quote from: Bow Down To The King Of Kings on October 10, 2006, 02:53:16 PMThe U.N. is totally useless. The Red Cross gets more done for third world countries every year than the U.N. Does. That's sad.They told Saddam to "stop it!" "I'm going to count to three!" for 10 years while Saddam just basically punked their ass. Then, the U.S.A. punked their ass too by going against their will to invade Iraq. Nobody anywhere gives the U.N. any creedence or basically gives a fuck what they do. The U.N. doesn't have power over people on good terms with them (u.s.), and doesn't have power over people on bad terms with them (Iraq).... what the fuck good are they? They're a joke. trauma shut up, and give me an update on dog chapman
You talk about the goodness of the UN, as if they are some kind of heavenly body, this is the same organisation which imposed on Iraq the oil for food embargo a policy which is estimated to have starved some 2 million people. Please do not talk about them being some kind of utopian society when the fact is they were getting mass amounts of oil without much food exchanging hands, the realiy of it was that it was an oil companies. Furthermore it was the UN who refused to send any more troops to protect those in mortal danger in Rwanda and who utlimately withdrew the forces from there leaving those africans totally defenceless. We all know about the resulting bloodbath that occured there, the U.N is like any other organisation you can not naively believe that everything that occurs within it is good and that they should have unchecked power. Your right in what you said before it is those individual countries which decide upon how much power to give the U.N or rather it is not the countries but the ruling party which is exactly the reason why there should be a massive overhaul in the constitution. I really do not think giving an organisation carte blanche to do whatever it likes and to have more power than a nation is a good thing. To be honest I really do not know what to make of the U.N when one of its powerful nations is scumbag China. a place where no one is given human rights and all those that oppose are sent to brutal labour camps jailed and beaten tortured or killed.
Quote from: King Tech Quadafi on October 10, 2006, 03:44:16 PMQuote from: Bow Down To The King Of Kings on October 10, 2006, 02:53:16 PMThe U.N. is totally useless. The Red Cross gets more done for third world countries every year than the U.N. Does. That's sad.They told Saddam to "stop it!" "I'm going to count to three!" for 10 years while Saddam just basically punked their ass. Then, the U.S.A. punked their ass too by going against their will to invade Iraq. Nobody anywhere gives the U.N. any creedence or basically gives a fuck what they do. The U.N. doesn't have power over people on good terms with them (u.s.), and doesn't have power over people on bad terms with them (Iraq).... what the fuck good are they? They're a joke. trauma shut up, and give me an update on dog chapmanWho are you? Bow down to the king of kings. On your knees, mutt.