It's May 14, 2024, 07:52:36 PM
Total Members Voted: 21
Sorry NIK but IMO Howard easily.
Quote from: Spice 2k7 on January 14, 2007, 01:39:24 AMSorry NIK but IMO Howard easily.Are you going based off stats or off development as a player?
Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.
Quote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.
Both will definitely do their share of dominating, but I honestly believe Andrew Bynum will be the absolute most dominant player in the league when his prime comes...What about ya'll?