It's May 04, 2024, 09:16:44 AM
Total Members Voted: 21
Quote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.
Quote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48.
Let's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.
Quote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?
Quote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:46:04 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?Dwight Howard = PF-C.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:47:10 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:46:04 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?Dwight Howard = PF-C.Dwight Howard = C-PFhttp://www.nba.com/magic/roster/
Quote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:50:30 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:47:10 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:46:04 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?Dwight Howard = PF-C.Dwight Howard = C-PFhttp://www.nba.com/magic/roster/Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...The point was:C Andrew BynumPF Dwight Howard
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:52:19 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:50:30 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:47:10 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:46:04 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?Dwight Howard = PF-C.Dwight Howard = C-PFhttp://www.nba.com/magic/roster/Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...The point was:C Andrew BynumPF Dwight HowardLOL@ this dumbass. It's not the same fuckin thing. Notice they list Darko as F-C. Their natural position is listed first.
Quote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:54:29 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:52:19 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:50:30 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:47:10 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:46:04 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?Dwight Howard = PF-C.Dwight Howard = C-PFhttp://www.nba.com/magic/roster/Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...The point was:C Andrew BynumPF Dwight HowardLOL@ this dumbass. It's not the same fuckin thing. Notice they list Darko as F-C. Their natural position is listed first. Wow, you really need help, man...Notice how some sites list him as a PF-C, idiot:http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3818
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 12:02:34 PMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:54:29 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:52:19 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:50:30 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:47:10 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:46:04 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?Dwight Howard = PF-C.Dwight Howard = C-PFhttp://www.nba.com/magic/roster/Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...The point was:C Andrew BynumPF Dwight HowardLOL@ this dumbass. It's not the same fuckin thing. Notice they list Darko as F-C. Their natural position is listed first. Wow, you really need help, man...Notice how some sites list him as a PF-C, idiot:http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3818I'll take the official NBA site over Yahoo Sports everytime.
Quote from: Spice 2k7 on January 14, 2007, 01:39:24 AMSorry NIK but IMO Howard easily.Are you going based off stats or off development as a player?
Sorry NIK but IMO Howard easily.
Quote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 12:07:57 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 12:02:34 PMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:54:29 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:52:19 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:50:30 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:47:10 AMQuote from: Jrome Is The Truth on January 14, 2007, 11:46:04 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 11:42:35 AMQuote from: PLANT on January 14, 2007, 11:33:14 AMQuote from: R-Tistic on January 14, 2007, 11:24:04 AMQuote from: Antonio on January 14, 2007, 08:27:37 AMLet's compare Bynum's 2006/07 stats with Howard's 2004/05 stats (both 19 years old)Points per 48 mins:HOWARD - 17.6BYNUM - 19.5Rebounds per 48 mins:HOWARD - 14.8BYNUM - 14.1Blocks per 48 mins:HOWARD - 2.4BYNUM - 4.1 ()Pretty similiar stats. Bynum in 2 years will probably have the same stats Howard is averaging this year. So i'd take Bynum over Howard, even if Howard is promising and exciting as fuck too.Per 48 stats are VERY deceiving....especially in Bynum's case, since he doesn't even have the stamina to play 30 strong minutes, let alone 48. no shit, lets try posting the REAL stats and stop pretending Bynum is playing 48 mins. Hes actually playin 19 mins a game, and if he was good enough, would be playing 30-35 mins.He'd easily be playing 30-35 minutes on a team like the Magic...He'd be starting over Howard?Dwight Howard = PF-C.Dwight Howard = C-PFhttp://www.nba.com/magic/roster/Is this a joke? LOL...Same fuckin' thing, man...The point was:C Andrew BynumPF Dwight HowardLOL@ this dumbass. It's not the same fuckin thing. Notice they list Darko as F-C. Their natural position is listed first. Wow, you really need help, man...Notice how some sites list him as a PF-C, idiot:http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3818I'll take the official NBA site over Yahoo Sports everytime.Notice how you avoided the main point to ride my nuts over something petty, just like in the Gary Payton thread.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 01:43:55 AMQuote from: Spice 2k7 on January 14, 2007, 01:39:24 AMSorry NIK but IMO Howard easily.Are you going based off stats or off development as a player?Dwight Howard still wins both catagories.
Quote from: GangstaBoogy on January 14, 2007, 12:44:04 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on January 14, 2007, 01:43:55 AMQuote from: Spice 2k7 on January 14, 2007, 01:39:24 AMSorry NIK but IMO Howard easily.Are you going based off stats or off development as a player?Dwight Howard still wins both catagories.Are you serious? Dwight Howard progressed as much in his second year as Andrew Bynum? LOL.