Lifestyle > Sports & Entertainment
Sticky: DUBCC's Sports Hall of Fame
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
And he was also easily the better player. Replace Russell with Wilt on that Celtic team, and they woulda' won just as much, if not more. By the time Wilt was on the Lakers, he was way out of his prime, but he still took the Celtics to 7 games and won a championship in 72, when he finally got a real supporting cast. Either way, Kareem>Wilt>Russell. That's the way it'll always be.
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 19, 2008, 12:32:51 AM ---And he was also easily the better player. Replace Russell with Wilt on that Celtic team, and they woulda' won just as much, if not more. By the time Wilt was on the Lakers, he was way out of his prime, but he still took the Celtics to 7 games and won a championship in 72, when he finally got a real supporting cast. Either way, Kareem>Wilt>Russell. That's the way it'll always be.
--- End quote ---
didn't Bob Cousy say if the Celtics had Wilt they would've won maybe 2 or 3 rings?
and wilt > kareem too. russell > both ofcourse. russell could sit there at night and stare at two fists full of rings.
chamberlain sat there next to some std infested prostitute lol.
kareem will sit there in his funny looking blue featehr suit that he wore as a guest on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air show
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 19, 2008, 10:47:37 AM ---
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 19, 2008, 12:32:51 AM ---And he was also easily the better player. Replace Russell with Wilt on that Celtic team, and they woulda' won just as much, if not more. By the time Wilt was on the Lakers, he was way out of his prime, but he still took the Celtics to 7 games and won a championship in 72, when he finally got a real supporting cast. Either way, Kareem>Wilt>Russell. That's the way it'll always be.
--- End quote ---
didn't Bob Cousy say if the Celtics had Wilt they would've won maybe 2 or 3 rings?
and wilt > kareem too. russell > both ofcourse. russell could sit there at night and stare at two fists full of rings.
chamberlain sat there next to some std infested prostitute lol.
kareem will sit there in his funny looking blue featehr suit that he wore as a guest on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air show
--- End quote ---
I somehow doubt you're basing your opinion off each players individual skill. Kareem would shit all over Russell. No question. Ask these guys:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-GreatestCenters
OG Hack Wilson:
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 19, 2008, 12:55:14 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 19, 2008, 10:47:37 AM ---
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 19, 2008, 12:32:51 AM ---And he was also easily the better player. Replace Russell with Wilt on that Celtic team, and they woulda' won just as much, if not more. By the time Wilt was on the Lakers, he was way out of his prime, but he still took the Celtics to 7 games and won a championship in 72, when he finally got a real supporting cast. Either way, Kareem>Wilt>Russell. That's the way it'll always be.
--- End quote ---
didn't Bob Cousy say if the Celtics had Wilt they would've won maybe 2 or 3 rings?
and wilt > kareem too. russell > both ofcourse. russell could sit there at night and stare at two fists full of rings.
chamberlain sat there next to some std infested prostitute lol.
kareem will sit there in his funny looking blue featehr suit that he wore as a guest on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air show
--- End quote ---
I somehow doubt you're basing your opinion off each players individual skill. Kareem would shit all over Russell. No question. Ask these guys:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-GreatestCenters
--- End quote ---
dwight howard recieve a vote despite being the league for a total of 2 years LOL what a convincing list
btw Russell had more MVPs than Wilt despite all the fancy stats, and the 11 rings
Now_Im_Not_Banned:
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 19, 2008, 09:25:02 PM ---
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 19, 2008, 12:55:14 PM ---
--- Quote from: Hack Wilson on January 19, 2008, 10:47:37 AM ---
--- Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 19, 2008, 12:32:51 AM ---And he was also easily the better player. Replace Russell with Wilt on that Celtic team, and they woulda' won just as much, if not more. By the time Wilt was on the Lakers, he was way out of his prime, but he still took the Celtics to 7 games and won a championship in 72, when he finally got a real supporting cast. Either way, Kareem>Wilt>Russell. That's the way it'll always be.
--- End quote ---
didn't Bob Cousy say if the Celtics had Wilt they would've won maybe 2 or 3 rings?
and wilt > kareem too. russell > both ofcourse. russell could sit there at night and stare at two fists full of rings.
chamberlain sat there next to some std infested prostitute lol.
kareem will sit there in his funny looking blue featehr suit that he wore as a guest on the Fresh Prince of Bel Air show
--- End quote ---
I somehow doubt you're basing your opinion off each players individual skill. Kareem would shit all over Russell. No question. Ask these guys:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-GreatestCenters
--- End quote ---
dwight howard recieve a vote despite being the league for a total of 2 years LOL what a convincing list
btw Russell had more MVPs than Wilt despite all the fancy stats, and the 11 rings
--- End quote ---
Dwight got ONE 10th place vote...not like there was much competition at the 10 spot to begin with.
But anyways, it's obvious, my dude. Wilt, at one point, led the league in assists! He was the far superior individual talent, and Kareem was even better than him, so go figure.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version