It's May 07, 2024, 08:31:14 PM
Quote from: tha letter d on August 12, 2007, 06:23:53 PMI could be wrong because I stopped reading the Source after '93 and I knowthey did an article revising some past ratings but that list from Wikipedia is laughable. The first ten albums listed came out before the Source even existed. I have all the issues up to '93 excluding the first two. I remember for a fact that The Ghetto Boys "Grip It" got like three and a half. A lot of those albums originally recieved four and a half or were not even reviewed at the time they came out. I just can't agree with a magazine going back and rewriting their own history, as they must have in a later issue. Otherwise Wikipedia has once again gotten the "facts" completely mixed up. They do more harm than help. But this argument/discussion is much needed so I'm glad I saw this thread.they did an article revising some past ratingsI got The Source issue when they did it,wikipedia is on point this time.They did it once and can do it again.They should add 1/2-1 mic to every non east coast release and subtract 1/2-1 mic of every east coast release.
I could be wrong because I stopped reading the Source after '93 and I knowthey did an article revising some past ratings but that list from Wikipedia is laughable. The first ten albums listed came out before the Source even existed. I have all the issues up to '93 excluding the first two. I remember for a fact that The Ghetto Boys "Grip It" got like three and a half. A lot of those albums originally recieved four and a half or were not even reviewed at the time they came out. I just can't agree with a magazine going back and rewriting their own history, as they must have in a later issue. Otherwise Wikipedia has once again gotten the "facts" completely mixed up. They do more harm than help. But this argument/discussion is much needed so I'm glad I saw this thread.