Stephon Marbury: "Dog Fighting Is A Sport"

[Lunatic]

Stephon Marbury commented on the Michael Vick situation to a television station in Albany, New York.

“We don’t say anything about people shooting deers and shooting other animals," said Marbury. "You know what I mean? From what I hear, dog-fighting is a sport. It’s just behind closed doors and I think it’s tough that we build Michael Vick up and then we break him down. I think he’s one of the superb athletes and he’s a good human being. I think he fell into a bad situation.”

he got a point with that deers thing...

[Fuck Your Existence]

lol,more proof of his apparent brain damage...when's the last time someone mentioned havin pit bull for dinner? hunting>electrocuting a dog for not performing in a dog fight

[GangstaBoogy]

Wow what a horrible time to say that.

“We don’t say anything about people shooting deers and shooting other animals," said Marbury. "

Although, that is a great point.

[Don Jacob]

difference is with hunting, you'reblasting them with a shotty. i don't know how many of you have ever shot a one  or bucked a deer, but those fuckers are dead (usually) almost instantaneously. the point is to kill as quick as possible. no suffering.

[WC Iz Active]

This moron has no idea what he is talking about

[hisairness]

Anybody comparing shooting a deer and hanging, beating, or shocking a dog is a retard.

Most hunters will put an animal out of its misery if the first shot doesn't kill it.

[I Am The Anton]

Deer aren't domesticated animals, dogs are. Deer can't be trained to do anything useful, dogs can. Deer are an actual threat to human lives, and unless a dog is abused by its owner they usually aren't. Deer are killed as quick as possible, when hunting the whole point is to kill them with no suffering involved, and afterwards most people eat the meat. Last time I checked people aren't hunting and cooking dogs in this country.

Hunting is used as a form of population control. If there was no hunting, the deer population would get out of control, and the number of car accidents caused by a deer wandering into the road would probably skyrocket.

Basically what i'm saying is, there is a 95% chance Marbury is mentally retarded and Michael Vick is a piece of shit.

[Lunatic]

Anybody comparing shooting a deer and hanging, beating, or shocking a dog is a retard.

Most hunters will put an animal out of its misery if the first shot doesn't kill it.

do u really think this case would be looked at much different if instead of beating, or shocking the dogs, vick just shot them 2 kill them??

[I Am The Anton]

Anybody comparing shooting a deer and hanging, beating, or shocking a dog is a retard.

Most hunters will put an animal out of its misery if the first shot doesn't kill it.

do u really think this case would be looked at much different if instead of beating, or shocking the dogs, vick just shot them 2 kill them??

But what would be the point of killing his dogs? Unless they had fucking rabies or something and posed some sort of threat to him or his family there are probably laws against that. And all of this isn't all about his just torturing the dogs, he was hosting dog fights, which is illegal and just plain sick.

[Lunatic]

Anybody comparing shooting a deer and hanging, beating, or shocking a dog is a retard.

Most hunters will put an animal out of its misery if the first shot doesn't kill it.

do u really think this case would be looked at much different if instead of beating, or shocking the dogs, vick just shot them 2 kill them??

But what would be the point of killing his dogs? Unless they had fucking rabies or something and posed some sort of threat to him or his family there are probably laws against that. And all of this isn't all about his just torturing the dogs, he was hosting dog fights, which is illegal and just plain sick.

true..im just saying, i doubt the case would be looked at differently if the dogs were not suffering, and simply shot with 1 bullet...i'm not condoing what he did, i guess i just don't care much about this case cause im not a dog lover anyway...but agian, i know it was wrong

[I Am The Anton]

Anybody comparing shooting a deer and hanging, beating, or shocking a dog is a retard.

Most hunters will put an animal out of its misery if the first shot doesn't kill it.

do u really think this case would be looked at much different if instead of beating, or shocking the dogs, vick just shot them 2 kill them??

But what would be the point of killing his dogs? Unless they had fucking rabies or something and posed some sort of threat to him or his family there are probably laws against that. And all of this isn't all about his just torturing the dogs, he was hosting dog fights, which is illegal and just plain sick.

true..im just saying, i doubt the case would be looked at differently if the dogs were not suffering, and simply shot with 1 bullet...i'm not condoing what he did, i guess i just don't care much about this case cause im not a dog lover anyway...but agian, i know it was wrong

There would be no reason to look at the case differently, suffering or not, the dog fights were illegal. Just the fights alone would cause the dogs to suffer. For a dog fight to take place, you first have to have 2 very aggressive dogs in your possesion, now lets say one of those dogs got loose and they ended up in a nearby neighbors yard or something and attacked a kid. There are just multiple reasons why this whole thing is fucked up.

[Lunatic]

Anybody comparing shooting a deer and hanging, beating, or shocking a dog is a retard.

Most hunters will put an animal out of its misery if the first shot doesn't kill it.

do u really think this case would be looked at much different if instead of beating, or shocking the dogs, vick just shot them 2 kill them??

But what would be the point of killing his dogs? Unless they had fucking rabies or something and posed some sort of threat to him or his family there are probably laws against that. And all of this isn't all about his just torturing the dogs, he was hosting dog fights, which is illegal and just plain sick.

true..im just saying, i doubt the case would be looked at differently if the dogs were not suffering, and simply shot with 1 bullet...i'm not condoing what he did, i guess i just don't care much about this case cause im not a dog lover anyway...but agian, i know it was wrong

There would be no reaso nto look at the case differently, suffering or not, the dog fights were illegal. Just the fights alone would cause the dogs to suffer. For a dog fight to take place, you first have to have 2 very aggressive dogs in your possesion, no lets say one of those dogs got loose and they ended up in a nearby neighbors yard or something and attacked a kid. There are just multiple reasons why this whole thing is fucked up.

true...i saw some footage of dog fights and WOW they are pretty vicious and nasty...yea real talk with the kid example

[MontrealCity's Most]

Dog fightin is not a sport .

Maybe we should put these 2 clowns in a fight against 2 dogs and have a tag team match.

Michael Vick and Stephon Marburry Vs too Pit bulls who havent eaten and fed gun powder

[I Am The Anton]

Dog fightin is not a sport .

Maybe we should put these 2 clowns in a fight against 2 dogs and have a tag team match.

Michael Vick and Stephon Malburry Vs too Pit bulls who havent eaten and fed gun powder

I'd pay to see that if Vick and Marbury were forced to fight on their hands and knees. I'm sure Vick will get quite used to that position in prison.

[d-nice]

Man the last couple of interviews Starbury has done, he be acting like he high off that angel dust or something.