It's May 14, 2024, 12:09:54 AM
LOL@anyone who thinks Kobe is getting traded this year...lotsa' funny people post here.Edit:LMAO...I just noticed BabyG didn't even include Deng in his Bulls trade scenerio.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on October 25, 2007, 10:31:14 AMLOL@anyone who thinks Kobe is getting traded this year...lotsa' funny people post here.Edit:LMAO...I just noticed BabyG didn't even include Deng in his Bulls trade scenerio. The Bulls aren't trading Deng. They wouldn't trade him for Garnett and they're not trading him for Kobe...ANAHEIM -- Reading between the lines and the rhetoric and the speculation around the NBA, it now seems to be a matter of when, not if, Kobe Bryant will be traded.There he was Tuesday night, in Lakers purple and gold, revving up the Honda Center crowd during an exhibition game against the Utah Jazz. As always, "Ko-BE! Ko-BE! Ko-BE!" was the most popular player in the building.But will Bryant be wearing the same uniform when the Lakers open the 2007-08 regular season next week? A report in one New York tabloid Tuesday said not to bet on that one, "even if L.A. must accept an inequitable return" because "that's how repugnant he supposedly has become to the owner's senses."Ouch. Is Jerry Buss that angry at the Kobester?Perhaps, but it's more likely Bryant will be playing for the Lakers until at least mid-December, one team insider said Tuesday, because of the contract status of one player the Lakers are interested in acquiring.Though the Dallas Mavericks and New York Knicks also have been mentioned prominently in recent trade speculation, most signs point to the Chicago Bulls as the most logical destination for Bryant.Nobody knows what is or isn't going on behind the scenes, but Bryant has the leverage of a full no-trade clause in his contract, meaning he essentially can choose his next team. He also has an opt-out clause in his contract after two more seasons, so the disenchantment he expressed publicly in the offseason has to be taken seriously.There is no urgency to trade Bryant now. The team can sift through potential offers and move him before the February trading deadline, if the Lakers aren't in serious playoff contention at the time, or it can wait until after the season. The team certainly can't wait any longer than that and risk losing him to free agency without any compensation.And if the Bulls are the most logical suitor — and all indications are that Bryant would love to play in Chicago, where Michael Jordan became a star — a deal could happen by December.The Bulls reportedly have made star forward Luol Deng untouchable, so the Lakers made it known they wouldn't agree to a deal unless the incoming package includes center Ben Wallace, a choice between guards Ben Gordon and Kirk Hinrich, and others.But when the Chicago Tribune reported that Bryant wants to play with Wallace, it meant the Bulls would have to change the package to perhaps include Tyrus Thomas or Joakim Noah, forward Andres Nocioni and a first-round pick.Word is the Lakers are very interested in Nocioni, a former Argentine star who averaged 14.1 points and 5.7 rebounds for Chicago last season. But by rule, he can't be traded until after Dec. 15.There also has been speculation in Chicago the Bulls want to find out how good this team will be before making a major trade.So it looks as if Lakers fans will be able to cheer Bryant for at least a few more weeks.But it doesn't look as if this marriage can be saved. Bryant alienated almost everyone in the organization by complaining in the offseason about the team not doing what it takes to improve — he wanted Jason Kidd as a teammate last season and Kevin Garnett this season — and Buss supposedly is hurt that Bryant already has forgotten how staunchly the team supported him during his legal ordeal in Colorado a few years ago.And it certainly didn't help Bryant's attitude when Buss recently told the assembled media in Hawaii he would definitely consider trading his superstar.If it's not Chicago, it still might be Dallas, but Mavericks owner Mark Cuban insists Dirk Nowitzki will not be part of the package. Would a deal centered around Josh Howard and Jason Terry get it done? Not likely.And forget those silly Phoenix Suns rumors last week. Sure, Raja Bell, Amare Stoudamire and Leandro Barbosa would make the Lakers a better team, but there's no way they would risk being embarrassed several times a year by making a trade with the Suns. Why do you think Shaquille O'Neal went to Miami instead of Dallas?But, rest assured, Kobe Bryant is out of here. It's just a matter of time.In the interim, the rumors continue to swirl."Obviously, people are tuned into it, but it can only be a drumbeat for so long and then it kind of fades," Coach Phil Jackson said before Tuesday night's game, insisting the trade speculation is not a distraction for his team. "But it's still there. It's in the background."Until the day Kobe puts on another uniform.
Quote from: GangstaBoogy on October 25, 2007, 11:34:40 AMQuote from: Now_I_Know on October 25, 2007, 10:31:14 AMLOL@anyone who thinks Kobe is getting traded this year...lotsa' funny people post here.Edit:LMAO...I just noticed BabyG didn't even include Deng in his Bulls trade scenerio. The Bulls aren't trading Deng. They wouldn't trade him for Garnett and they're not trading him for Kobe...ANAHEIM -- Reading between the lines and the rhetoric and the speculation around the NBA, it now seems to be a matter of when, not if, Kobe Bryant will be traded.There he was Tuesday night, in Lakers purple and gold, revving up the Honda Center crowd during an exhibition game against the Utah Jazz. As always, "Ko-BE! Ko-BE! Ko-BE!" was the most popular player in the building.But will Bryant be wearing the same uniform when the Lakers open the 2007-08 regular season next week? A report in one New York tabloid Tuesday said not to bet on that one, "even if L.A. must accept an inequitable return" because "that's how repugnant he supposedly has become to the owner's senses."Ouch. Is Jerry Buss that angry at the Kobester?Perhaps, but it's more likely Bryant will be playing for the Lakers until at least mid-December, one team insider said Tuesday, because of the contract status of one player the Lakers are interested in acquiring.Though the Dallas Mavericks and New York Knicks also have been mentioned prominently in recent trade speculation, most signs point to the Chicago Bulls as the most logical destination for Bryant.Nobody knows what is or isn't going on behind the scenes, but Bryant has the leverage of a full no-trade clause in his contract, meaning he essentially can choose his next team. He also has an opt-out clause in his contract after two more seasons, so the disenchantment he expressed publicly in the offseason has to be taken seriously.There is no urgency to trade Bryant now. The team can sift through potential offers and move him before the February trading deadline, if the Lakers aren't in serious playoff contention at the time, or it can wait until after the season. The team certainly can't wait any longer than that and risk losing him to free agency without any compensation.And if the Bulls are the most logical suitor — and all indications are that Bryant would love to play in Chicago, where Michael Jordan became a star — a deal could happen by December.The Bulls reportedly have made star forward Luol Deng untouchable, so the Lakers made it known they wouldn't agree to a deal unless the incoming package includes center Ben Wallace, a choice between guards Ben Gordon and Kirk Hinrich, and others.But when the Chicago Tribune reported that Bryant wants to play with Wallace, it meant the Bulls would have to change the package to perhaps include Tyrus Thomas or Joakim Noah, forward Andres Nocioni and a first-round pick.Word is the Lakers are very interested in Nocioni, a former Argentine star who averaged 14.1 points and 5.7 rebounds for Chicago last season. But by rule, he can't be traded until after Dec. 15.There also has been speculation in Chicago the Bulls want to find out how good this team will be before making a major trade.So it looks as if Lakers fans will be able to cheer Bryant for at least a few more weeks.But it doesn't look as if this marriage can be saved. Bryant alienated almost everyone in the organization by complaining in the offseason about the team not doing what it takes to improve — he wanted Jason Kidd as a teammate last season and Kevin Garnett this season — and Buss supposedly is hurt that Bryant already has forgotten how staunchly the team supported him during his legal ordeal in Colorado a few years ago.And it certainly didn't help Bryant's attitude when Buss recently told the assembled media in Hawaii he would definitely consider trading his superstar.If it's not Chicago, it still might be Dallas, but Mavericks owner Mark Cuban insists Dirk Nowitzki will not be part of the package. Would a deal centered around Josh Howard and Jason Terry get it done? Not likely.And forget those silly Phoenix Suns rumors last week. Sure, Raja Bell, Amare Stoudamire and Leandro Barbosa would make the Lakers a better team, but there's no way they would risk being embarrassed several times a year by making a trade with the Suns. Why do you think Shaquille O'Neal went to Miami instead of Dallas?But, rest assured, Kobe Bryant is out of here. It's just a matter of time.In the interim, the rumors continue to swirl."Obviously, people are tuned into it, but it can only be a drumbeat for so long and then it kind of fades," Coach Phil Jackson said before Tuesday night's game, insisting the trade speculation is not a distraction for his team. "But it's still there. It's in the background."Until the day Kobe puts on another uniform.If the Bulls aren't trading Deng, Lakers aren't sending the best player on the planet to them...LOL. Even if they WERE sending Deng, we still wouldn't make that deal.
^At that point, no one knew Nash would break into a "superstar" in Phoenix's system...But either way, Kobe right now is still in his prime...Shaq wasn't. No one is trading Kobe unless a team can offer their whole roster...Our management said the same thing...Common sense should prevail over media frenzy...PeACe
Quote from: Now_I_Know on October 25, 2007, 12:39:58 PM^At that point, no one knew Nash would break into a "superstar" in Phoenix's system...But either way, Kobe right now is still in his prime...Shaq wasn't. No one is trading Kobe unless a team can offer their whole roster...Our management said the same thing...Common sense should prevail over media frenzy...PeACeWhat the fuck are you talking about moron? When that deal was offered Nash was already a 2 time All-Star. Walker was already an All-Star. Josh Howard was loaded with potential, and we would've had a lottery pick. But we sent him to Miami for Caron Butler, Mr. Inconsistant, and even took on Brian Grant's huge contract (we didn't even push hard for Wade). If we couldn't get Wade for Shaq then we're certainly not getting a "whole roster" for Kobe. Prime or not its not happening. Hell Iverson got traded for Andre Miller, Joe Smith, and 2 draft picks.
Quote from: GangstaBoogy on October 25, 2007, 01:08:40 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on October 25, 2007, 12:39:58 PM^At that point, no one knew Nash would break into a "superstar" in Phoenix's system...But either way, Kobe right now is still in his prime...Shaq wasn't. No one is trading Kobe unless a team can offer their whole roster...Our management said the same thing...Common sense should prevail over media frenzy...PeACeWhat the fuck are you talking about moron? When that deal was offered Nash was already a 2 time All-Star. Walker was already an All-Star. Josh Howard was loaded with potential, and we would've had a lottery pick. But we sent him to Miami for Caron Butler, Mr. Inconsistant, and even took on Brian Grant's huge contract (we didn't even push hard for Wade). If we couldn't get Wade for Shaq then we're certainly not getting a "whole roster" for Kobe. Prime or not its not happening. Hell Iverson got traded for Andre Miller, Joe Smith, and 2 draft picks. We coulda' gotten Wade, dipshit...Refrain from calling people a moron when you're clearly on a whole level under everyone in this section on the intelligence scale. Back then, Dallas' offer wasn't that much better. Odom was coming off a breakthrough year as a 4 in the east and was a much better prospect than Josh Howard. Caron Butler had great potential to be an all-star. We had Gary Payton at the point guard. Nash was regarded a borderline all-star back then...Antoine Walker was considered a joke and an inconvenience to have on your team after the Celtics got rid of him...Not to mention, Brian Grant was supposed to be a very serviceable big, which we desperately needed.. no one knew that would be the year he broke down...Now, revisiting the trade, yes, the Dallas package looks nicer...But still, back then Odom and Butler looked more enticing compared to Nash and Howard...PeACe
Quote from: Now_I_Know on October 25, 2007, 01:50:46 PMQuote from: GangstaBoogy on October 25, 2007, 01:08:40 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on October 25, 2007, 12:39:58 PM^At that point, no one knew Nash would break into a "superstar" in Phoenix's system...But either way, Kobe right now is still in his prime...Shaq wasn't. No one is trading Kobe unless a team can offer their whole roster...Our management said the same thing...Common sense should prevail over media frenzy...PeACeWhat the fuck are you talking about moron? When that deal was offered Nash was already a 2 time All-Star. Walker was already an All-Star. Josh Howard was loaded with potential, and we would've had a lottery pick. But we sent him to Miami for Caron Butler, Mr. Inconsistant, and even took on Brian Grant's huge contract (we didn't even push hard for Wade). If we couldn't get Wade for Shaq then we're certainly not getting a "whole roster" for Kobe. Prime or not its not happening. Hell Iverson got traded for Andre Miller, Joe Smith, and 2 draft picks. We coulda' gotten Wade, dipshit...Refrain from calling people a moron when you're clearly on a whole level under everyone in this section on the intelligence scale. Back then, Dallas' offer wasn't that much better. Odom was coming off a breakthrough year as a 4 in the east and was a much better prospect than Josh Howard. Caron Butler had great potential to be an all-star. We had Gary Payton at the point guard. Nash was regarded a borderline all-star back then...Antoine Walker was considered a joke and an inconvenience to have on your team after the Celtics got rid of him...Not to mention, Brian Grant was supposed to be a very serviceable big, which we desperately needed.. no one knew that would be the year he broke down...Now, revisiting the trade, yes, the Dallas package looks nicer...But still, back then Odom and Butler looked more enticing compared to Nash and Howard...PeACeSo we coulda gotten Wade but we didn't? Shut the fuck up. Stop talking to me with all these coulda/woulda/shoulda/ifs