Lifestyle > Train of Thought

I cant cosign RON PAUL because...

<< < (4/4)

Machiavelli:

--- Quote from: Dubz on December 02, 2007, 08:30:13 PM ---
--- Quote from: Machiavelli on December 02, 2007, 05:56:17 PM ---you understand that if he runs indepenedent hes gunna get alot of votes from republicans making their candiate loose.

which in turn would make hillary clinton as president. ::)

--- End quote ---

ill take hillary over john mccain or rudy giuliani any day of the week.

--- End quote ---

lol...well hillary clinton=rudy giulani i dont like either espeicially clinton...Now john mccain is the only dude i can trust besides ron paul. and even him wont be great. But please, hillary.

TraceOneInfinite:
Tech, you are a logical man, but I don't find much sense in your opening post.

Maybe its because your not familiar with the history of the Libertarian party and its lack of success in runing Independant candidates.  Ron Paul himself tried to run for president Independantly as a Libertarian many years ago and it achieved little attention.

Harry Browne was much more charismatic than Ron Paul, and he ran as an Independant (Libertarian) candidate in 1996 and 2000 and hardly anyone even knows his name today, he got less than 1 million votes... and he was the greatest political mind I've ever heard in my life.

So my point is, the reason Ron Paul has had succes where other Libertarians haven't, is because he's gotten on the ballot as a Republican, and this has allowed him access to all the advantages of the two party system and prevented him from the discrimination third party candidates always receive.

Running as a Republican allowed him entry into the debates, and if it wasn't for his argument over 9-11 in an early debate with Gulliani most people would not even know his name.

Shallow:

--- Quote from: Abdul-Infinite Presents...Islam In Africa... on December 06, 2007, 01:16:46 AM ---Tech, you are a logical man, but I don't find much sense in your opening post.

Maybe its because your not familiar with the history of the Libertarian party and its lack of success in runing Independant candidates.  Ron Paul himself tried to run for president Independantly as a Libertarian many years ago and it achieved little attention.

Harry Browne was much more charismatic than Ron Paul, and he ran as an Independant (Libertarian) candidate in 1996 and 2000 and hardly anyone even knows his name today, he got less than 1 million votes... and he was the greatest political mind I've ever heard in my life.

So my point is, the reason Ron Paul has had succes where other Libertarians haven't, is because he's gotten on the ballot as a Republican, and this has allowed him access to all the advantages of the two party system and prevented him from the discrimination third party candidates always receive.

Running as a Republican allowed him entry into the debates, and if it wasn't for his argument over 9-11 in an early debate with Gulliani most people would not even know his name.

--- End quote ---



Unfortunately most people still don't know his name. Hopefully that changes soon.

Narrator:
I can't co-sign Ron Paul because he's white.

boycriedwolf619:

--- Quote from: Foday-muh'fuckin-Sankoh, bitch! on December 06, 2007, 10:59:43 AM ---I can't co-sign Ron Paul because he's white.

--- End quote ---
LMAO!!!!!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page