It's June 16, 2024, 07:39:57 AM
thats clearly an offensive foul
(if the defender)was still, or moving sideways or backwards but not forwards, when contact occurred took a legal guarding position before the contact, that is, one with both feet on the floor was hit on the torso (as opposed to the arm or leg) respected the elements of time and distance (is outside the restriction area, nba rules) then the offensive player was at fault and should be charged with a charging foul.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_foul
Quote from: Sparegizzle the Nizzle on December 27, 2007, 03:34:23 AMAlls I know is you're going to owe me 40 at the end of the season.
as a basketball referee, i cant see how thats not a clear charge. the defender was in positionQuote(if the defender)was still, or moving sideways or backwards but not forwards, when contact occurred took a legal guarding position before the contact, that is, one with both feet on the floor was hit on the torso (as opposed to the arm or leg) respected the elements of time and distance (is outside the restriction area, nba rules) then the offensive player was at fault and should be charged with a charging foul.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_foulhe fulfilled all premisesthats a clear charge.
Quote from: Maestro Minded / LME on December 27, 2007, 08:43:46 AMthats clearly an offensive foulIf you see it with no slow motion it doesn't look so clear, man. I mean it was a though decision. But it's probably an offensive foul, yeah. Gotta be real with y'all.