It's May 21, 2024, 07:29:38 AM
but Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO. Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.
Quote from: SpIcE2k8 on January 07, 2008, 09:11:38 PMbut Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO. Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACe
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 07, 2008, 11:22:03 PMQuote from: SpIcE2k8 on January 07, 2008, 09:11:38 PMbut Jermaines been doing this for years so I think its pretty immature for someone to say Bynum>>JO. Its gona still be another few years until we will be able to say that imo.And? As of now, Bynum is playing way more like an all-star than JO is...BTW, the word you're looking for is premature...PeACeJO is scoring like 3 more poinst a gamebut anything Spice sticks up for must be incorrectand call me when the Lakers have a dynasty that lasts a decade long. shaq dominated against no threats too.
And for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em
Quote from: Vegasmac25 on January 07, 2008, 10:39:20 PMBynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.
Bynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.
Quote from: GangstaBoogy on January 08, 2008, 12:23:43 AMAnd for those of us that were raised in the 90s...who are the Boston Celtics? Never heard of em And for those of us that were raised in the 90s... who are the Showtime Lakers? Never heard of em. 80s = Lakers90s = Bulls
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 07, 2008, 11:21:05 PMQuote from: Vegasmac25 on January 07, 2008, 10:39:20 PMBynum has all the tools to become better than JO but to say that at this stage of his career is an insult to JO.An insult? Aren't you a Laker fan? Not only did Bynum own JO in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well...LOL.LeBron > Kobe
Not only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.
Outside of the 1991, the Lakers never got into the Finals in the 90s and only made it past the 2nd round one other time. They were the Dallas Mavericks of 90s. Its not like the Lakers did anything worthwhile in the 90s for people to even know them. The 90s belonged to the Bulls. The Rockets. The Spurs. Not the Lakers.
Quote from: 7even is the next Iwan Karamasow on January 08, 2008, 11:38:02 AMNot only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on January 08, 2008, 11:40:17 AMQuote from: 7even is the next Iwan Karamasow on January 08, 2008, 11:38:02 AMNot only did LeBron own Kobe in their head-to-head matchup, but his overall numbers are killing his as well. While LeBron goes for 24 in the 4th quarter, Kobe gets outshined by Bynum and the bench mob.Martell Webster also had 24 in a quarter this year...LOL.We all know what Kobe can do scoring-wise. He'd be averaging 40 points and 10 rebounds in Lebron's shoes. Yeah, probably, as when the Lakers sucked dicked he missed the playoffs averaging 27 points a game on .433 shooting along with 6 rebounds and 4 turnovers.