Author Topic: Fat Joe response to 50's video  (Read 476 times)

Blood$

Fat Joe response to 50's video
« on: March 21, 2008, 12:38:05 PM »
 

MoreSwaggerThanMickJagger

  • Guest
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2008, 12:40:16 PM »
So very true.
 

BuddenzNasir

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
  • Karma: 118
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2008, 03:50:11 PM »
thats it? lame
 

virtuoso

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 3048
  • Karma: 333
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2008, 03:55:49 PM »

Clearly those losses are completely wrong because Curtis sold at least a few million and therefore even if Interscope did give it that budget, then they at least recouped I suspect or if they didn't it wasn't as big as what that loss suggests.
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2008, 04:17:11 PM »
fat joes a bum lol
 

Plague

  • Lil Geezy
  • *
  • Posts: 53
  • Karma: 5
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2008, 05:24:34 PM »
fat joe lost again
 

K-9

  • Guest
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2008, 06:08:31 PM »
Fat joe is a joke :D
 

TRG

Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2008, 06:31:45 PM »
yeh that was shit

The King

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2349
  • Karma: -332
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2008, 06:47:13 PM »
At least 50 Cent made a decently produced video. Fat Joe had colored words on a black screen. I wonder who's still losing money :P
 

Lunatic

Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2008, 06:54:32 PM »

Clearly those losses are completely wrong because Curtis sold at least a few million and therefore even if Interscope did give it that budget, then they at least recouped I suspect or if they didn't it wasn't as big as what that loss suggests.
nope. In USA its barely over 1 mill..i can't imagine the worldwide #s putting it to a "few million."
Co-Director of Site Content For Raptalk.Net
Staff Writer For WordOfSouth.Com
Staff Writer For Illuminati2G.Net
Staff Writer For SoPrupRadio.com
 

D~Nice

  • Guest
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2008, 06:58:12 PM »
50 is going to end up giving Joe the Ja Rule treatment.
 

The King

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 2349
  • Karma: -332
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2008, 07:09:07 PM »

Clearly those losses are completely wrong because Curtis sold at least a few million and therefore even if Interscope did give it that budget, then they at least recouped I suspect or if they didn't it wasn't as big as what that loss suggests.
nope. In USA its barely over 1 mill..i can't imagine the worldwide #s putting it to a "few million."

No album would have that budget. The features weren't all that spectacular, mostly interscope people. The production didn't have that many huge names. They for sure lost some money, but 50 is worth a few hundred million, so probably doesn't matter.
 

funkkid

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 798
  • Karma: 32
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2008, 08:33:01 PM »
fif and joe are lame
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2008, 09:09:56 PM »
wats funny bout this video is, 50 at least like spent money to make it. fat joe doesnt have one thing. he has parts of 50's video and then statistics, which arent even true. LMAO and to wat the kidd sed up there ^^^ JOE HAS RECIEVED THE JA RULE TREATMENT lol. 8)
 

Lunatic

Re: Fat Joe response to 50's video
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2008, 09:25:22 PM »
Clearly those losses are completely wrong because Curtis sold at least a few million and therefore even if Interscope did give it that budget, then they at least recouped I suspect or if they didn't it wasn't as big as what that loss suggests.
nope. In USA its barely over 1 mill..i can't imagine the worldwide #s putting it to a "few million."
No album would have that budget. The features weren't all that spectacular, mostly interscope people. The production didn't have that many huge names. They for sure lost some money, but 50 is worth a few hundred million, so probably doesn't matter.
yeah no way that budget was that big
Co-Director of Site Content For Raptalk.Net
Staff Writer For WordOfSouth.Com
Staff Writer For Illuminati2G.Net
Staff Writer For SoPrupRadio.com