Lifestyle > Tha G-Spot
Board Discussion:Is US justified in attacking.....
Don Jacob:
aright tech my bad for misinterpreting , it just seemed you were trying to make it a chritian/islam for a sec
and the reason why Iraq ....rathr sadam husein is next is because he's the next big name after Usama in the middle east that the American people litterally hate right now (lol i mean c'mon just look at the south park movie and you'll see the message they're trying to say) and since america is ran by the people (at least that's the way it's suppose to be ran) i guess our strategy is to knock out the next big name so a few people can rest easy i suppose
i kinda agree with this and i kinda don't becuase theres a grip of asian assholes we need to deal with first IMO, and like i said i think we should be doing the 50/50 thing like i said earlier
ps props to tech for acting mature this time with his response
techniec:
--- Quote ---aright tech my bad for misinterpreting , it just seemed you were trying to make it a chritian/islam for a sec
and the reason why Iraq ....rathr sadam husein is next is because he's the next big name after Usama in the middle east that the American people litterally hate right now (lol i mean c'mon just look at the south park movie and you'll see the message they're trying to say) and since america is ran by the people (at least that's the way it's suppose to be ran) i guess our strategy is to knock out the next big name so a few people can rest easy i suppose
i kinda agree with this and i kinda don't becuase theres a grip of asian assholes we need to deal with first IMO, and like i said i think we should be doing the 50/50 thing like i said earlier
ps props to tech for acting mature this time with his response
--- End quote ---
"props to tech for acting mature......??????"
*resists urge to reply negatively........must fight demons......
must be mature.............must not swear........*
j/k
but seriously, i can understand americas need to defend itself, and i can understand the US govt calming its citizens fears, but not when the Govt themselves essentially created those fears, i think Saddam Hussein is the next Govt created "Boogieman"......
i mean he really isnt no threat to the US, 13 years ago, he was your ally,i wish americans would realize their govt works for Israel.....
as for Joachim, yes of course i cant forget about Pakistan
those Kashmiri militant groups such as the Harakat ul Mujahiden as well as those domestic fundementalist groups such as Sapia eh Sahaba, are all affiliated with the govt
Jamal420:
prince techniec.....i agree wit u on everything u said and i dunno if it can be put better than that.....probably could be but we gotta remember this is a hip hop board so we dont wanna get too deep
one more thing....did you guys know the U.S. has been trying to establish themselves in Afghanistan for a long time but they couldn't because they wanted the oil but for them to have access to the oil that there would have to be "one,stable,ruling government" that would cooperate.....now they have that (almost)........if the U.S. says it's in Afghanistan to get rid of the taliban (they said this was one of their objectives because of their hard-line islamic lines)....why arent we going into Saudi Arabia....where women arent allowed to drive and there is still the "eye 4 an eye" law......it's all about the $$$$money$$$$ people....the U.S. doesn't wanna have to do anything against Saudi Arabia because that is where we get our oil
i'm 100% behind america in eliminating terrorism....but when u have to do more damage than the terrorists could ever do, it makes no sense.....why kill thousands of innocent civilians when that's exactly what you're trying to prevent
techniec:
^^word
The Big Bad Ass:
I personally feel that Bush's whole objective in the attacks was to eventually sneak our way into Iraq, and "finish the job" that his father started. If this is true, then I can't possible tell you there is any justification in us attacking. I agree with what Jamal said in that I back the US 100% on stopping terrorism, but not at the expense of innocents. Cutting off funding for known groups, ect, I can understand. But like I said, I have a gut feeling that this whole incident was a big excuse to get into Iraq. Otherwise, we would just be at war with the Taliban, not "Terrorism" in whole.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version