It's October 08, 2025, 12:55:41 PM
Quote from: Styles1 on June 23, 2008, 03:14:44 PMIf it makes you feel better, you can always print out the article and use it to the line the bottom of your bird cage..... Naw, i care for them.
If it makes you feel better, you can always print out the article and use it to the line the bottom of your bird cage.....
Quote from: Mr. Javii on June 23, 2008, 03:15:11 PMQuote from: Antonio on June 23, 2008, 03:11:34 PMNaw. I quote him.That's where this project comes in. Using both numbers and a healthy dose of opinion, my task today is to rank the top 50 individual NBA Finals performances since the merger. I've included the player efficiency rating (PER) of every player in the top 50 as a guide, but this wasn't my only measuring stick. Basically, everything counts: competition, defense, clutch play, winning, durability ... it all matters.He doesn't even have that excuse.He claims everything counts, but you can tell it's heavily influenced by PER alone. Ok man, but he's supposed to be an NBA expert. So he's supposed to better than that. Putting Wade in top of the list is just incredibly stupid no matter what the criteria was.
Quote from: Antonio on June 23, 2008, 03:11:34 PMNaw. I quote him.That's where this project comes in. Using both numbers and a healthy dose of opinion, my task today is to rank the top 50 individual NBA Finals performances since the merger. I've included the player efficiency rating (PER) of every player in the top 50 as a guide, but this wasn't my only measuring stick. Basically, everything counts: competition, defense, clutch play, winning, durability ... it all matters.He doesn't even have that excuse.He claims everything counts, but you can tell it's heavily influenced by PER alone.
Naw. I quote him.That's where this project comes in. Using both numbers and a healthy dose of opinion, my task today is to rank the top 50 individual NBA Finals performances since the merger. I've included the player efficiency rating (PER) of every player in the top 50 as a guide, but this wasn't my only measuring stick. Basically, everything counts: competition, defense, clutch play, winning, durability ... it all matters.He doesn't even have that excuse.
^Since I don't follow baseball much, let me ask you, is there a HEAVY east coast bias with them in other sports or is it just with basketball?
Hollinger is all abouth maths... and therefore all about stats, he cares about nothing else.
Bill Simmons has been taking jabs at him for a while He didn't rank Shane Battier as a top 40 SF, (because of his stats, of course) and Simmons dissed him for that. Then he ranked the 2001 Laker team too low in terms of best NBA teams of all time and Simmons dissed him for that, too. Probably also some other stuff I didn't read.
Who the fuck is this journalist named John Hollinger?http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playoffs2008/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&page=FinalsPerformances-1D-Wade ranks #1 in the Greatest NBA Finals Performances Ever. No fucking comment.
Quote from: 7even on June 23, 2008, 04:02:49 PMBill Simmons has been taking jabs at him for a while He didn't rank Shane Battier as a top 40 SF, (because of his stats, of course) and Simmons dissed him for that. Then he ranked the 2001 Laker team too low in terms of best NBA teams of all time and Simmons dissed him for that, too. Probably also some other stuff I didn't read.Simmons is an idiot too...Hollinger makes him look like a genius, though. Hollinger hates anything Laker related, which is also why he ranked the 2001 Laker team so low.
Quote from: Now_I_Know on June 23, 2008, 04:06:24 PMQuote from: 7even on June 23, 2008, 04:02:49 PMBill Simmons has been taking jabs at him for a while He didn't rank Shane Battier as a top 40 SF, (because of his stats, of course) and Simmons dissed him for that. Then he ranked the 2001 Laker team too low in terms of best NBA teams of all time and Simmons dissed him for that, too. Probably also some other stuff I didn't read.Simmons is an idiot too...Hollinger makes him look like a genius, though. Hollinger hates anything Laker related, which is also why he ranked the 2001 Laker team so low.I DUNNO HE RANKED THE 1987 LAKER SQUAD AS THE SECOND BEST FINALS SQUAD EVER. (AND HAD THE 85 SQUAD AT #6)
Quote from: Towelie on June 23, 2008, 08:29:50 PMQuote from: Now_I_Know on June 23, 2008, 04:06:24 PMQuote from: 7even on June 23, 2008, 04:02:49 PMBill Simmons has been taking jabs at him for a while He didn't rank Shane Battier as a top 40 SF, (because of his stats, of course) and Simmons dissed him for that. Then he ranked the 2001 Laker team too low in terms of best NBA teams of all time and Simmons dissed him for that, too. Probably also some other stuff I didn't read.Simmons is an idiot too...Hollinger makes him look like a genius, though. Hollinger hates anything Laker related, which is also why he ranked the 2001 Laker team so low.I DUNNO HE RANKED THE 1987 LAKER SQUAD AS THE SECOND BEST FINALS SQUAD EVER. (AND HAD THE 85 SQUAD AT #6)Oh, wow...As if he wouldn't have been fired for leaving those teams out. (Nevermind... he's employed by ESPN.)