It's June 16, 2024, 07:07:58 AM
Quote from: "THE" MoSav on July 15, 2008, 09:51:41 AMQuote from: Hack Wilson on July 15, 2008, 08:23:23 AMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on July 14, 2008, 02:33:03 AMLOL@not top 5, cmon Spice...Brady and Peyton I will give you, BUT THATS IT. Romo, maybe. But who would u deep down rather have for one game? Romo or Favre, spice? All hate aside..Be Honest..And Favre>>Palmer, Roth, And Brees. 2008 he had 28 tds 95.6 rating, 66% percent Completions, and 4200 yds and remember he had 8 weeks of no run game and they were still scoring 30 a game and he looked amazing all year. Hes still top 3 imo, if not you can at least argue it and he is DEF top 5...Look at all the talent Palmer and Bress play with, and they still led there teams to avg seasons...favre's line > cinci, pitt and NO's linesyour telling me FAVRE at age 50 is better than carson palmer??? playa pleasehes not 50 but right now yes, FAVRE>>>PALMERDid u watch Carson play last year, a bit dissapointing...who was Carson's RB? oh thats right, rudi johnson and insert felon were non existant in 07 who were his WRs? oh thats right, Mr. Skitzofranic Chad Johnson , TJ (no complaints) and Chris Henry who's wearing prison stripes rightn ow, not bengal stripesman, if you put Palmer on GB last year and Brett on Cinci, Cinci goes 5-11 and GB still goes 12-4 or wahtever they were
Quote from: Hack Wilson on July 15, 2008, 08:23:23 AMQuote from: "THE" MoSav on July 14, 2008, 02:33:03 AMLOL@not top 5, cmon Spice...Brady and Peyton I will give you, BUT THATS IT. Romo, maybe. But who would u deep down rather have for one game? Romo or Favre, spice? All hate aside..Be Honest..And Favre>>Palmer, Roth, And Brees. 2008 he had 28 tds 95.6 rating, 66% percent Completions, and 4200 yds and remember he had 8 weeks of no run game and they were still scoring 30 a game and he looked amazing all year. Hes still top 3 imo, if not you can at least argue it and he is DEF top 5...Look at all the talent Palmer and Bress play with, and they still led there teams to avg seasons...favre's line > cinci, pitt and NO's linesyour telling me FAVRE at age 50 is better than carson palmer??? playa pleasehes not 50 but right now yes, FAVRE>>>PALMERDid u watch Carson play last year, a bit dissapointing...
Quote from: "THE" MoSav on July 14, 2008, 02:33:03 AMLOL@not top 5, cmon Spice...Brady and Peyton I will give you, BUT THATS IT. Romo, maybe. But who would u deep down rather have for one game? Romo or Favre, spice? All hate aside..Be Honest..And Favre>>Palmer, Roth, And Brees. 2008 he had 28 tds 95.6 rating, 66% percent Completions, and 4200 yds and remember he had 8 weeks of no run game and they were still scoring 30 a game and he looked amazing all year. Hes still top 3 imo, if not you can at least argue it and he is DEF top 5...Look at all the talent Palmer and Bress play with, and they still led there teams to avg seasons...favre's line > cinci, pitt and NO's linesyour telling me FAVRE at age 50 is better than carson palmer??? playa please
LOL@not top 5, cmon Spice...Brady and Peyton I will give you, BUT THATS IT. Romo, maybe. But who would u deep down rather have for one game? Romo or Favre, spice? All hate aside..Be Honest..And Favre>>Palmer, Roth, And Brees. 2008 he had 28 tds 95.6 rating, 66% percent Completions, and 4200 yds and remember he had 8 weeks of no run game and they were still scoring 30 a game and he looked amazing all year. Hes still top 3 imo, if not you can at least argue it and he is DEF top 5...Look at all the talent Palmer and Bress play with, and they still led there teams to avg seasons...
lol @ gb for filing tampering charges against minnesota....for a player thats currently retired and that they supposedly dont need/want anymore
The Packers have filed tampering charges with the NFL against the Minnesota Vikings for what they deem to be "illegal contact" with Favre, reports NFL Network's Adam Schefter
Quote from: ^ReLentLess^ on July 16, 2008, 10:32:54 PMlol @ gb for filing tampering charges against minnesota....for a player thats currently retired and that they supposedly dont need/want anymorestill breaking rules...Becuase Favre is still signed for another 2-3 years at 10 million lol...PLus iits the vikingsQuoteThe Packers have filed tampering charges with the NFL against the Minnesota Vikings for what they deem to be "illegal contact" with Favre, reports NFL Network's Adam Schefter
Quote from: eS El Duque on July 16, 2008, 11:58:35 PMQuote from: ^ReLentLess^ on July 16, 2008, 10:32:54 PMlol @ gb for filing tampering charges against minnesota....for a player thats currently retired and that they supposedly dont need/want anymorestill breaking rules...Becuase Favre is still signed for another 2-3 years at 10 million lol...PLus iits the vikingsQuoteThe Packers have filed tampering charges with the NFL against the Minnesota Vikings for what they deem to be "illegal contact" with Favre, reports NFL Network's Adam Scheftertrue, but why not make a move. either release him or trade him. the longer it drags on the uglier the situation gets. they say they worry bout his legacy lol....whats better...goin out on your own terms as a starter on a diffrent team or bein a cheerleader carrying a clipboard?
this is gettin out of hand. TRADE HIM!!!!
The Pack need to just trade him or release him. For their sake, trade him. They are gonna come out the bad guys here. They might as well get a 1st round pick for him if possible. They pressured him to make a decision after the season (understandibly, they needed to know what direction to take in the draft) and he retired. Im sure, just like every other player...once that time came around where you typically start working out for next season...he realized he made a mistake and wanted to come back. The Packers are best to just stick with Rogers...and move forward. He is their future. But they should have nipped this Favre issue in the bud. All this distraction only ADDS to the pressure that Rogers will already be under.
Quote from: Jookin247 on July 25, 2008, 11:32:35 PMThe Pack need to just trade him or release him. For their sake, trade him. They are gonna come out the bad guys here. They might as well get a 1st round pick for him if possible. They pressured him to make a decision after the season (understandibly, they needed to know what direction to take in the draft) and he retired. Im sure, just like every other player...once that time came around where you typically start working out for next season...he realized he made a mistake and wanted to come back. The Packers are best to just stick with Rogers...and move forward. He is their future. But they should have nipped this Favre issue in the bud. All this distraction only ADDS to the pressure that Rogers will already be under. real talk..in defense to the pack they would be the bad guy regardless especially in the eyes of the majority of the gb faithful...i just wanna see him continue to play with a contender if at all possible cause it will be pointless if he doesnt imo