It's May 13, 2024, 03:36:03 PM
Lewis deserved it because he was superb. No Country For Old Men was 10 times better than this was.
I think it received praise because there are so many layers to the plot, you can interpret it yourself, and so many movies are just point a-b...so it was really refreshing just the way it was presented, with such dark sarcasm that it was almost a comedy... i dont know...i really like it, but i can feel you on it just being solid too.
'Oh I can't see him, I can't see God', YA'LL CAN'T SEE FUCKIN' AIR NEITHER!
Prove to me the wind. Show me the wind man. I want proof of that shit. Cuz I don't see it.
there will be blood and no country for old men are both EXCELLENT movies.
It was a solid movie and yes Daniel Day-Lewis was incredible and Paul Dano as "Eli" was impressive as well but overall this just want a great movie at all. I have a hard time understanding what people think was so great about this, again don't get me wrong, I don't think it was a bad movie in fact I think it was solid but in no way do I think this deserved all of the acclaim that it received, Lewis deserved it because he was superb but overall as a movie it just wasn't that great. No Country For Old Men was 10 times better than this was.