Lifestyle > Train of Thought
Redistribution of Wealth
Low Key:
--- Quote from: The King on October 28, 2008, 01:55:26 PM ---What's so bad about redistribution of wealth? Obama's plan is give tax cuts to everyone under 250,000k (More money back then McCain would give them) and tax everyone over 250,000k more. How can anyone who's not rich, not like this? 95% of the population will benefit, the wealth is being spread to YOU. When Palin stands in front of her crowds and says Obama wants to redistribute the wealth, what she doesn't say is, almost everyone in the crowd will get a BIGGER tax cut.
--- End quote ---
Because redistribution of wealth is socialism. Obama can stand on his soapbox all he wants and claim he will lower taxes for 95% of Americans, but I know that is far from the truth. Clinton said he'd lower taxes, but my check stub said otherwise. Plus, Obama would have the senate and the house on his side if he is elected. There is no way he wouldn't try and pull some funny shit.
Javier:
Democrats are being elected in very conservative districts, so Obama knows very well that he's still going to have to be center-left to have a Democratic Congress as well.
Jared Taylor:
--- Quote from: Low Key on October 28, 2008, 02:31:56 PM ---
--- Quote from: The King on October 28, 2008, 01:55:26 PM ---What's so bad about redistribution of wealth? Obama's plan is give tax cuts to everyone under 250,000k (More money back then McCain would give them) and tax everyone over 250,000k more. How can anyone who's not rich, not like this? 95% of the population will benefit, the wealth is being spread to YOU. When Palin stands in front of her crowds and says Obama wants to redistribute the wealth, what she doesn't say is, almost everyone in the crowd will get a BIGGER tax cut.
--- End quote ---
Because redistribution of wealth is socialism. Obama can stand on his soapbox all he wants and claim he will lower taxes for 95% of Americans, but I know that is far from the truth. Clinton said he'd lower taxes, but my check stub said otherwise. Plus, Obama would have the senate and the house on his side if he is elected. There is no way he wouldn't try and pull some funny shit.
--- End quote ---
The very idea that poor blacks and Latinos deserve taxpayers' money is ridiculous. They deserve to live in poverty for being so lazy.
Turf Hitta:
--- Quote from: Low Key on October 28, 2008, 02:31:56 PM ---
--- Quote from: The King on October 28, 2008, 01:55:26 PM ---What's so bad about redistribution of wealth? Obama's plan is give tax cuts to everyone under 250,000k (More money back then McCain would give them) and tax everyone over 250,000k more. How can anyone who's not rich, not like this? 95% of the population will benefit, the wealth is being spread to YOU. When Palin stands in front of her crowds and says Obama wants to redistribute the wealth, what she doesn't say is, almost everyone in the crowd will get a BIGGER tax cut.
--- End quote ---
Because redistribution of wealth is socialism. Obama can stand on his soapbox all he wants and claim he will lower taxes for 95% of Americans, but I know that is far from the truth. Clinton said he'd lower taxes, but my check stub said otherwise. Plus, Obama would have the senate and the house on his side if he is elected. There is no way he wouldn't try and pull some funny shit.
--- End quote ---
Again, capitalism and socialism dont work alone. It takes a little of each.
Turf Hitta:
--- Quote from: Low Key on October 28, 2008, 12:36:39 PM ---
--- Quote from: Turf Hitta on October 28, 2008, 02:27:54 AM ---http://www.youtube.com/v/oY0uKG3CHpA
sounds like Bush to me...
--- End quote ---
I'm not a republican. Posting fake audio ANYONE can identify does not affect me.
The interview I posted, however, is very real. Josh Andrews acknowledged it on his blog and he was the one who recorded the interview.
--- End quote ---
lol, nobody cares if you're a republican or if that shit affects you. You missed the point.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version