Author Topic: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???  (Read 1059 times)

Rick McCrank

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #15 on: December 11, 2008, 03:34:56 AM »
lakers don't play enough D in my opinion, so when they run into a team like Boston thats built around it they get exposed.

not sayin that as a "hater" or celtic fan, thats just the truth

celtics arent perfect either but they have mental toughness that the MOST of the Lakers don't seem to possess

I agree with Hack the Homo

the Lakers are pussy, you have to admit it

 

Antonio

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 1000
  • Karma: 43
  • R.I.P. Nate
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #16 on: December 11, 2008, 04:08:42 AM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.
 

.:DaYg0sTyLz:.

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #17 on: December 11, 2008, 10:37:17 AM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol
"...and these niggas gettin tattoo tears...industry Bloods that show fear, when the authentics are near"
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #18 on: December 11, 2008, 11:21:22 AM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

hahahahaha! +1
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2008, 12:44:54 PM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #20 on: December 11, 2008, 12:59:06 PM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.

CALM DOWN.
I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.
lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol
Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.

LOL hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #21 on: December 11, 2008, 01:15:01 PM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.

how about when the Pacers beat you a week or two ago? :P ;D
 

Teddy Roosevelt

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 7538
  • Karma: 179
  • The Trust-Buster
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #22 on: December 11, 2008, 04:04:08 PM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.

how about when the Pacers beat you a week or two ago? :P ;D
Beating a team once, and beating them in a 7 game playoff series is completly different. No team goes undefeated.
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #23 on: December 11, 2008, 04:18:02 PM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.

how about when the Pacers beat you a week or two ago? :P ;D
Beating a team once, and beating them in a 7 game playoff series is completly different. No team goes undefeated.

lol, i know; i just like fuckin with the LA fans. ;) ;D :P
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #24 on: December 11, 2008, 05:52:35 PM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.


Posey really means alot when we're 19-2, huh?  that's what your holding on to here?

i mean Bynum's a fine player but has the landscape of LA really changed that much?  they still allow 100 points a game!

i loved Posey as much as the next C's fan but he's 1 player, and Rondo's evolving to the point where Posey's minutes aren't needed as bad




LOL@asking if Bynum changes the landscape...OF COURSE, YOU FOOL. Gasol moves from center to power forward and Lamar Odom comes off the bench. You've said a lot of dumb things in the past, but that was right up there. :-X


and LOL@acting like Posey wasn't a vital part of your success last season.
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #25 on: December 11, 2008, 05:56:49 PM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.


go jerk stoudemire off...i still say we were the better TEAM (when we played to our full potential). we were up 3-1 and coulda won the series with a rebound...our players were just not as experienced and prepared to give it their all. it's part of growing, which is why we're the best team in the league right now, babyg. :-*


and tone's just mad cuz the spurs aint up in the talks. :laugh:
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #26 on: December 11, 2008, 06:00:54 PM »
19-2, posey who?
 

GangstaBoogy

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #27 on: December 12, 2008, 12:14:00 AM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...


We COULDA beat them last year

THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.



CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.


go jerk stoudemire off...i still say we were the better TEAM (when we played to our full potential). we were up 3-1 and coulda won the series with a rebound...our players were just not as experienced and prepared to give it their all. it's part of growing, which is why we're the best team in the league right now, babyg. :-*


and tone's just mad cuz the spurs aint up in the talks. :laugh:

If we blew a 3-1 lead to the Suns without their leading scorer...how the fuck were we the better team? C'mon man.
"House shoes & coffee: I know the paper gone come"

 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #28 on: December 12, 2008, 07:26:07 AM »
LOL@Laker fans on here acting like Boston is better than us...
We COULDA beat them last year
THIS year + Ariza and Bynum and them - James Posey = our chances double.
CALM DOWN.

I'm not saying we don't have a chance against them (if they end up having a better record than us). I'm saying i don't want to play 4 games in Boston, so we better take the best record.

lol When the Lakers beats someone....NIK thinks that means the Lakers are better then them. When the Lakers lose to someone, it doesnt mean that that team is better then the Lakers lol

Yes this is true. Remember when the Suns beat us in the 06 playoffs (without Stoudemire), Nik was still saying we were better than the Suns.


go jerk stoudemire off...i still say we were the better TEAM (when we played to our full potential). we were up 3-1 and coulda won the series with a rebound...our players were just not as experienced and prepared to give it their all. it's part of growing, which is why we're the best team in the league right now, babyg. :-*


and tone's just mad cuz the spurs aint up in the talks. :laugh:

If we blew a 3-1 lead to the Suns without their leading scorer...how the fuck were we the better team? C'mon man.

OWNED
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #29 on: December 14, 2008, 03:34:12 AM »
LOL@Hack and BabyG tag-teaming. Must feel good to know you got a Boston fan egging you on, huh? :laugh:...if we had a 3-1 lead to begin with, we clearly were the better team when we initiated. The fact that we couldn't hold the 3-1 lead only shows immaturity and lack of experience. If both the Suns and Lakers performed to full potential in those playoffs, Lakers woulda came out on top...PeACe