Author Topic: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???  (Read 1065 times)

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #30 on: December 16, 2008, 04:36:27 PM »
hey nik, were the lakers better than the pistons in 2004? :D
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #31 on: December 16, 2008, 04:59:13 PM »
If both the Suns and Lakers performed to full potential in those playoffs, Lakers woulda came out on top...PeACe

Amare has more potential than the entire Laker team (minus Kobe). ;)
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #32 on: December 16, 2008, 10:45:37 PM »
If both the Suns and Lakers performed to full potential in those playoffs, Lakers woulda came out on top...PeACe

Amare has more potential than the entire Laker team (minus Kobe). ;)

Amare didn't play that year, genius...and LMAO@Amare having more POTENTIAL than Bynum. :stupid:


hey nik, were the lakers better than the pistons in 2004? :D

Actually, yes, we were...LOL.
 

7even

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11283
  • Karma: -679
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #33 on: December 17, 2008, 03:17:26 AM »
^If that's the case, the Lakers are so damn pathetic always getting handled by inferior teams despite having the best coach... just pathetic.
Cause I don't care where I belong no more
What we share or not I will ignore
And I won't waste my time fitting in
Cause I don't think contrast is a sin
No, it's not a sin
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #34 on: December 17, 2008, 07:35:34 AM »
^If that's the case, the Lakers are so damn pathetic always getting handled by inferior teams despite having the best coach... just pathetic.

EXACTLY


you can't have the best players and coach, and lose

hes got the mentality of a 10 year old
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #35 on: December 17, 2008, 02:00:29 PM »
If both the Suns and Lakers performed to full potential in those playoffs, Lakers woulda came out on top...PeACe

Amare has more potential than the entire Laker team (minus Kobe). ;)

Amare didn't play that year, genius...and LMAO@Amare having more POTENTIAL than Bynum. :stupid:

alright Mr. English Major; "Amare has..."; meaning in the future he has a better chance to be better than the entire Laker team (big men) (minus Kobe). ;)
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #36 on: December 18, 2008, 01:25:40 AM »
^If that's the case, the Lakers are so damn pathetic always getting handled by inferior teams despite having the best coach... just pathetic.

EXACTLY


you can't have the best players and coach, and lose

hes got the mentality of a 10 year old


Ummm, when did I say the Lakers had the better players? I clearly stated we had an immature roster of mediocre players. In fact, I've been calling Kobe's suporting cast pre-Gasol era a D-League roster.. But as a TEAM, we were better when initiating the triangle offense at peak levels vs. the Suns running their run-n-gun style. it's just that us being immature and all, we didn' always operate the way we were capable of. get it yet, crack?
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #37 on: December 18, 2008, 01:27:42 AM »
If both the Suns and Lakers performed to full potential in those playoffs, Lakers woulda came out on top...PeACe

Amare has more potential than the entire Laker team (minus Kobe). ;)

Amare didn't play that year, genius...and LMAO@Amare having more POTENTIAL than Bynum. :stupid:

alright Mr. English Major; "Amare has..."; meaning in the future he has a better chance to be better than the entire Laker team (big men) (minus Kobe). ;)


Amare is very limited in potential. He's a power player who scores the bulk of his points off of his strength and athleticism. He's already developed a jump shot, so I dunno what more potential he has. He's undersized and can't defend well...Bynum, on the other hand, has tools which make for unlimited potential. Ya feel me?
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #38 on: December 18, 2008, 06:30:08 AM »
so the suns have better players, lakers were a better "team" (despite the Suns running away with the division)

lolllll
 

7even

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 11283
  • Karma: -679
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #39 on: December 18, 2008, 11:19:39 AM »
^Lakerism = religion  :-X
Cause I don't care where I belong no more
What we share or not I will ignore
And I won't waste my time fitting in
Cause I don't think contrast is a sin
No, it's not a sin
 

Chamillitary Click

  • Muthafuckin' Don!
  • *****
  • Posts: 25866
  • Thanked: 31 times
  • Karma: -295
  • The greatest entertainer ever.
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #40 on: December 18, 2008, 02:20:27 PM »
If both the Suns and Lakers performed to full potential in those playoffs, Lakers woulda came out on top...PeACe

Amare has more potential than the entire Laker team (minus Kobe). ;)

Amare didn't play that year, genius...and LMAO@Amare having more POTENTIAL than Bynum. :stupid:

alright Mr. English Major; "Amare has..."; meaning in the future he has a better chance to be better than the entire Laker team (big men) (minus Kobe). ;)


Amare is very limited in potential. He's a power player who scores the bulk of his points off of his strength and athleticism. He's already developed a jump shot, so I dunno what more potential he has. He's undersized and can't defend well...Bynum, on the other hand, has tools which make for unlimited potential. Ya feel me?

i feel he will one day be a good defender, not a top, but a good one.

the offense might be cut down a little, but even that would still make him one of the best offensive big men in the league.
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #41 on: December 18, 2008, 03:20:16 PM »
^Lakerism = religion  :-X
that's a worse one than "THe dark carnival" lol
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #42 on: December 18, 2008, 07:35:29 PM »
so the suns have better players, lakers were a better "team" (despite the Suns running away with the division)

lolllll


Suns had better players, but played for a faulty system...Lakers had less talented players, but played for a top-notch system. When both systems were executed to it's fullest potential, the Lakers shitted all over the Suns (hence the 3-1 series lead we had over them). why are you too retarded to get this?
 

Now_Im_Not_Banned

  • Guest
Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #43 on: December 18, 2008, 07:36:09 PM »
If both the Suns and Lakers performed to full potential in those playoffs, Lakers woulda came out on top...PeACe

Amare has more potential than the entire Laker team (minus Kobe). ;)

Amare didn't play that year, genius...and LMAO@Amare having more POTENTIAL than Bynum. :stupid:

alright Mr. English Major; "Amare has..."; meaning in the future he has a better chance to be better than the entire Laker team (big men) (minus Kobe). ;)


Amare is very limited in potential. He's a power player who scores the bulk of his points off of his strength and athleticism. He's already developed a jump shot, so I dunno what more potential he has. He's undersized and can't defend well...Bynum, on the other hand, has tools which make for unlimited potential. Ya feel me?

i feel he will one day be a good defender, not a top, but a good one.

the offense might be cut down a little, but even that would still make him one of the best offensive big men in the league.


Amare=overrated...I'll believe he can play defense when I see him doing it.
 

OG Hack Wilson

Re: Lakers and 72 wins???? CLE or Boston???
« Reply #44 on: December 23, 2008, 12:25:04 PM »
26-2, Posey who?