It's August 25, 2025, 07:14:29 AM
Bury me a G.wav - 50.62MB
Quote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 02:02:56 PMBury me a G.wav - 50.62MBIt's still a tape rip, so having it in a wave file doesn't increase it's quality, it's just good for archival purposes.
I don't remeber stating it was of CDQ? If you prefer re-encodes be my guest and look else where for free download links...and yeah thanks, no problem
Quote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 02:33:35 PMI don't remeber stating it was of CDQ? If you prefer re-encodes be my guest and look else where for free download links...and yeah thanks, no problem You didn't, I assumed you meant CDQ and I apologize... beyatch!
You assumed that a master tape from 93'-94' would magicaly be converted to super high CDQ once it's on the net labled as a WAVE? ok, i'm still smoking... just support the site www.ifidie2nite.net
Quote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 03:15:50 PMYou assumed that a master tape from 93'-94' would magicaly be converted to super high CDQ once it's on the net labled as a WAVE? ok, i'm still smoking... just support the site www.ifidie2nite.net No jerk, I assumed you MEANT CDQ... I know more about the source of that tape than you'd think, not to mention I've had it for almost 9 months now and I was at the very end of the totem pole for this one.
Quote from: Philmatic on July 30, 2009, 04:06:44 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 03:15:50 PMYou assumed that a master tape from 93'-94' would magicaly be converted to super high CDQ once it's on the net labled as a WAVE? ok, i'm still smoking... just support the site www.ifidie2nite.net No jerk, I assumed you MEANT CDQ... I know more about the source of that tape than you'd think, not to mention I've had it for almost 9 months now and I was at the very end of the totem pole for this one.at the end of the day, you're a nobody in my world... you don't have the tracks i do.
Quote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 06:54:59 PMQuote from: Philmatic on July 30, 2009, 04:06:44 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 03:15:50 PMYou assumed that a master tape from 93'-94' would magicaly be converted to super high CDQ once it's on the net labled as a WAVE? ok, i'm still smoking... just support the site www.ifidie2nite.net No jerk, I assumed you MEANT CDQ... I know more about the source of that tape than you'd think, not to mention I've had it for almost 9 months now and I was at the very end of the totem pole for this one.at the end of the day, you're a nobody in my world... you don't have the tracks i do. Actually, he has more. LOL. At the end of the day, Phil has a point and that WAV you have is a degrade.
Quote from: Toreno/Tanner on July 30, 2009, 06:58:21 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 06:54:59 PMQuote from: Philmatic on July 30, 2009, 04:06:44 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 03:15:50 PMYou assumed that a master tape from 93'-94' would magicaly be converted to super high CDQ once it's on the net labled as a WAVE? ok, i'm still smoking... just support the site www.ifidie2nite.net No jerk, I assumed you MEANT CDQ... I know more about the source of that tape than you'd think, not to mention I've had it for almost 9 months now and I was at the very end of the totem pole for this one.at the end of the day, you're a nobody in my world... you don't have the tracks i do. Actually, he has more. LOL. At the end of the day, Phil has a point and that WAV you have is a degrade.I could argue with you all day etc, i have a life outside the forums If you run the track through an audio authenticity detector, you'll see that this is 100% legit.
Quote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 09:43:44 PMQuote from: Toreno/Tanner on July 30, 2009, 06:58:21 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 06:54:59 PMQuote from: Philmatic on July 30, 2009, 04:06:44 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 03:15:50 PMYou assumed that a master tape from 93'-94' would magicaly be converted to super high CDQ once it's on the net labled as a WAVE? ok, i'm still smoking... just support the site www.ifidie2nite.net No jerk, I assumed you MEANT CDQ... I know more about the source of that tape than you'd think, not to mention I've had it for almost 9 months now and I was at the very end of the totem pole for this one.at the end of the day, you're a nobody in my world... you don't have the tracks i do. Actually, he has more. LOL. At the end of the day, Phil has a point and that WAV you have is a degrade.I could argue with you all day etc, i have a life outside the forums If you run the track through an audio authenticity detector, you'll see that this is 100% legit.Wrong again, it's WAV but the WAV was distorted. I know the source of the WAV, and I know how Dante's people got ahold of it too. Sundeep, the fact is - the shameless attempt for promotion isn't working and on top of the fact - you tried the life outside of forums argument! Hahaha. Sad.
Quote from: Toreno/Tanner on July 30, 2009, 09:48:15 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 09:43:44 PMQuote from: Toreno/Tanner on July 30, 2009, 06:58:21 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 06:54:59 PMQuote from: Philmatic on July 30, 2009, 04:06:44 PMQuote from: NuWest on July 30, 2009, 03:15:50 PMYou assumed that a master tape from 93'-94' would magicaly be converted to super high CDQ once it's on the net labled as a WAVE? ok, i'm still smoking... just support the site www.ifidie2nite.net No jerk, I assumed you MEANT CDQ... I know more about the source of that tape than you'd think, not to mention I've had it for almost 9 months now and I was at the very end of the totem pole for this one.at the end of the day, you're a nobody in my world... you don't have the tracks i do. Actually, he has more. LOL. At the end of the day, Phil has a point and that WAV you have is a degrade.I could argue with you all day etc, i have a life outside the forums If you run the track through an audio authenticity detector, you'll see that this is 100% legit.Wrong again, it's WAV but the WAV was distorted. I know the source of the WAV, and I know how Dante's people got ahold of it too. Sundeep, the fact is - the shameless attempt for promotion isn't working and on top of the fact - you tried the life outside of forums argument! Hahaha. Sad.David, can you be for real? Actually thinking you're on the GMG payroll at 17 years and all you have to stand for it is a gay friend. Smoke some cush, eat some, looks like you aint been eating
Home
Help
Login
Register
Print
