It's May 28, 2024, 07:40:01 AM
'Oh I can't see him, I can't see God', YA'LL CAN'T SEE FUCKIN' AIR NEITHER!
Prove to me the wind. Show me the wind man. I want proof of that shit. Cuz I don't see it.
From Death Row's Twitter: we CANNOT use unreleased Dr. Dre verses. That song was reviewed and contains Dre there for cant be used.Does this mean: noCalifornia Love (solo version)Mr. Officer (Dre version)Chronic 2or anything that was recorded for Helter Skelter
Quote from: Detox Is A Myth!!! on September 15, 2009, 07:16:34 AMQuote from: GangstaBoogy on September 14, 2009, 10:03:29 PMQuote from: Detox Is A Myth!!! on September 14, 2009, 07:28:42 PMFor the millionth time, WideAwake can't "just leak" the tracks, because that is a violation of federal copyright law. Get over it.How? Theres NO proof that it came from them. Don't be rediculous. Dre owns the publishing, and if it "accidentally" leaks to the Internet in CDQ (the original masters that WideAwake now has physical ownership and possession of), he can file a cause of action against WideAwake for violating publishing (think of it like a violation of his intellectual property rights as the copyright holder). The court will accept the cause of action as legitimate and substantial, because there is a case there that somebody illegally released Dre's copyrighted music. That means WideAwake enters into litigation in a case of "(Andre) Young vs. WideAwake Entertainment" to determine if WideAwake was the infringing party. And, yes, they would be litigated against, because they are the most obvious infringer. And what that basically entails is lawyer fees and the hassle of bad publicity and distraction...all for what? What does WideAwake get out of it? NOTHING. Some altruistic good deed presented to the fans as a tradeoff for entering into a lawsuit with Dr. Dre...puhleezee, use your brain. Everybody stop this nonsense. We will never hear The Next Episode. I highly doubt Dre would go through all that for a unreleased song from 1993 that made no profit.
Quote from: GangstaBoogy on September 14, 2009, 10:03:29 PMQuote from: Detox Is A Myth!!! on September 14, 2009, 07:28:42 PMFor the millionth time, WideAwake can't "just leak" the tracks, because that is a violation of federal copyright law. Get over it.How? Theres NO proof that it came from them. Don't be rediculous. Dre owns the publishing, and if it "accidentally" leaks to the Internet in CDQ (the original masters that WideAwake now has physical ownership and possession of), he can file a cause of action against WideAwake for violating publishing (think of it like a violation of his intellectual property rights as the copyright holder). The court will accept the cause of action as legitimate and substantial, because there is a case there that somebody illegally released Dre's copyrighted music. That means WideAwake enters into litigation in a case of "(Andre) Young vs. WideAwake Entertainment" to determine if WideAwake was the infringing party. And, yes, they would be litigated against, because they are the most obvious infringer. And what that basically entails is lawyer fees and the hassle of bad publicity and distraction...all for what? What does WideAwake get out of it? NOTHING. Some altruistic good deed presented to the fans as a tradeoff for entering into a lawsuit with Dr. Dre...puhleezee, use your brain. Everybody stop this nonsense. We will never hear The Next Episode.
Quote from: Detox Is A Myth!!! on September 14, 2009, 07:28:42 PMFor the millionth time, WideAwake can't "just leak" the tracks, because that is a violation of federal copyright law. Get over it.How? Theres NO proof that it came from them.
For the millionth time, WideAwake can't "just leak" the tracks, because that is a violation of federal copyright law. Get over it.
It would be a civil suit. He wouldn't have to do much. The better conclusion is, "I highly doubt WideAwake would go through all that to release a song from 1993 that they would make no profit from and in fact would have to litigate against their actions and fend off bad publicity, and further alienate their artists that they're trying to reach out to, and have to pay legal fees, and continue to diminish their corporate assets, etc."
damn u still havent logged off...ur hurting everyone with all this wack shit u drop, it hurts more then getting the swine fluQuote from: Laconic on March 16, 2010, 08:21:33 AMTue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM By: Ice CubeMe and Mack 10 together again? I never say never, but he has the kiss the ring first.Cubegbee:@ Petey: you sound like a broken record, time to grow up.
Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM By: Ice CubeMe and Mack 10 together again? I never say never, but he has the kiss the ring first.Cube
Not true. Remember that single mother from wherever who got sued by the RIAA for like a half million dollars for downloading some songs. People have this misconception that just because you're not physically selling something, it's not copyright infringement. Not every case is detailed for the world to see and some situations take higher presidence than others. Sometimes, people get away with leaking music because it helps promotion. In the case of Wideawake, they have nothing to gain from leaking unreleased Dr. Dre songs to the public and they'd run a pretty decent risk of getting sued for it.
They should just hire The Game to re-rap Dre's verses in his best Doctor Dre imitation voice. That way WideWake could release "Dre's verses" without Dre's agreement.
Quote from: GimmeYourShoes on September 16, 2009, 07:05:05 AMThey should just hire The Game to re-rap Dre's verses in his best Doctor Dre imitation voice. That way WideWake could release "Dre's verses" without Dre's agreement.nope, like i said last time, that would be corny.
if dre dies.. do we get all the music from his vaults?
Quote from: From Dre-Day to Helter Skelter on September 16, 2009, 11:24:16 AMQuote from: GimmeYourShoes on September 16, 2009, 07:05:05 AMThey should just hire The Game to re-rap Dre's verses in his best Doctor Dre imitation voice. That way WideWake could release "Dre's verses" without Dre's agreement.nope, like i said last time, that would be corny.Last time? This the first time. Now you're scaring me.
Quote from: GimmeYourShoes on September 16, 2009, 11:47:39 AMQuote from: From Dre-Day to Helter Skelter on September 16, 2009, 11:24:16 AMQuote from: GimmeYourShoes on September 16, 2009, 07:05:05 AMThey should just hire The Game to re-rap Dre's verses in his best Doctor Dre imitation voice. That way WideWake could release "Dre's verses" without Dre's agreement.nope, like i said last time, that would be corny.Last time? This the first time. Now you're scaring me.somebody else already made that suggestion before you.