It's May 13, 2024, 03:23:09 AM
Brady did nothing exceptional. All he did was throw to wide open WR all quarter. When I say wide open, I really stress that. Any QB could have done what he did. Those 3 rookie CB were no match for anything or anyone.
Quote from: Lunatic 63 on October 21, 2009, 09:54:31 AMBrady did nothing exceptional. All he did was throw to wide open WR all quarter. When I say wide open, I really stress that. Any QB could have done what he did. Those 3 rookie CB were no match for anything or anyone.Switch QBs and you'd have the exact same score NE-59 TEN-0
LOL, again with the "if's" & "you could's".show me facts.generating scenario's will lead to a never ending argument.i could say, "if Tom Brady" had less protection, he could do this or that.IF the Florida Marlins stayed together after they won a World Series, they could of won 5 or 6.IF Kobe didn't have Shaq, he couldn't of won a ring.
^who did Babe Ruth face? Randy Johnson? Roger Clemens? Nolan Ryan? Mariano? a left handed specialist out of the pen? unreal sliders & curve balls?i would agree, hitting 100 homeruns would make him hands down the greatest homerun hitter ever, but steriods (WHICH YOU APPROVE OF LOL) say differently lol.but like i was saying? who was he facing?anyway to answer your question, 47; yeah, in one game lol.since it's all hypothetical, i don't see how i can be wrong lol.
hey chamilitary clickbabe ruth faced WALTER JOHNSON walter johnson = best pitcher everoh and btw BAbe was one of the best pitchers ever too....go look at his post season pitching
chamilitary you sound like a fool trying to argue Brady over Manning
Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 21, 2009, 08:44:24 PMchamilitary you sound like a fool trying to argue Brady over Manningwhere do i make that argument? Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 21, 2009, 10:31:58 PMhey chamilitary clickbabe ruth faced WALTER JOHNSON walter johnson = best pitcher everoh and btw BAbe was one of the best pitchers ever too....go look at his post season pitching Babe Ruth is the best baseball players of all time, but "best HR hitter" doesn't equal best all all time.& Walter was amazing, but it was just him (with some others, take some sarcasm). but if you're trying to make the argument pitching back then was more dominant then opposed to all the of HOFer's that Aaron & Bonds faced i won't even bother responding.
Quote from: Chamillitary Click on October 22, 2009, 09:31:50 AMQuote from: Hack Wilson on October 21, 2009, 08:44:24 PMchamilitary you sound like a fool trying to argue Brady over Manningwhere do i make that argument? Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 21, 2009, 10:31:58 PMhey chamilitary clickbabe ruth faced WALTER JOHNSON walter johnson = best pitcher everoh and btw BAbe was one of the best pitchers ever too....go look at his post season pitching Babe Ruth is the best baseball players of all time, but "best HR hitter" doesn't equal best all all time.& Walter was amazing, but it was just him (with some others, take some sarcasm). but if you're trying to make the argument pitching back then was more dominant then opposed to all the of HOFer's that Aaron & Bonds faced i won't even bother responding.The stats are hard to find but by checking the HR logs of both Aaron and Ruth; Babe Ruth's top 20 pitchers he hit HRs off of consist of 4 hall of famers. Aaron's list has 5 hall of famers. What's your point?
who lead the league in home runs more than the Babe?Babe Ruth hit a record 29 homeruns in the DEAD BALL ERA - if you hit 15 back then you were a "slugger"
Quote from: Hack Wilson on October 22, 2009, 02:24:29 PMwho lead the league in home runs more than the Babe?Babe Ruth hit a record 29 homeruns in the DEAD BALL ERA - if you hit 15 back then you were a "slugger"lol, the competiton today is so much better than it was in the 1920's, it's barely comparable.how many players back then even hit more than 35 homeruns in a season?he had nobody pitching to him & the "somebodies" who were pitching to him were throwing 18 straight innings in back to back double headers lol.